Excerpts

You are currently browsing the archive for the Excerpts category.

From a Spiegel report by Marco Evers about Santander, a port city in Spain that has beaten the world largest metropolises in becoming a smart city, with sensors recording and reporting:

“Luis Muñoz, 48, is an IT professor at the University of Cantabria. He received nearly €9 million ($11.7 million) in research money, most of it from the EU, to develop a prototype smart city. Muñoz permanently installed 10,000 sensors around downtown Santander, throughout an area of 6 square kilometers (2.3 square miles). The sensors are hidden inside small gray boxes attached to street lamps, poles and building walls. Some are even buried beneath the asphalt of parking lots.

Day in and day out, these sensors measure more or less everything that can be measured: light, pressure, temperature, humidity, even the movements of cars and people.

Every couple of minutes, they transmit their data to Muñoz’s laboratory at the university, the central location that collects data streams from throughout the city. Every single bus transmits its position, mileage and speed, as well as data from its environment, such as ozone or nitric oxide pollution levels. Taxis and police cars do the same. Even the people of Santander can choose to become human sensors themselves. All it takes is to download a special app for GPS-enabled cell phones.

A central computer compiles the data into one big picture that is constantly being updated. Santander is a digital city, and everything here gets recorded. The system knows exactly where the traffic jams are and where the air is bad. Noise and ozone maps show what parts of the city are exceeding EU limits. Things can get particularly interesting when a major street is blocked because of an accident. Muñoz can observe in real time how that event affects traffic in the rest of the city.”

Tags: ,

Applying the hilarious bile of the Buffalo Beast‘s great 50 Most Loathsome Americans lists to the Forbes 2013 billionaires list, Lynn Stuart Parramore has turned out a wonderfully scathing feature for Salon. One entry:

The Koch brothers: Charles Koch ($34 bn), David Koch ($34 bn), William Koch ($4 bn)

Where to begin? David and Charles, the brothers still with Koch industries, are among the world’s biggest polluters, for starters. Bill Koch, who split off from the family company, is a world-class weirdo who devotes himself to things like building a faux Western town solely for his amusement and buying a $2 million photo of Billy the Kid. Though not as active in bankrolling GOP pols as his brothers, Bill was a big supporter of fellow 1 percent jerk Mitt Romney and has found time to fight against America’s first offshore wind farm in Massachusetts. As for David and Charles, they have won a permanent spot in the Public Menace Hall of Fame, kicking their fellow human beings in the face with everything from funding climate change denial to strangling democracy. They have striven mightily to reshape America into a Tea Party nightmare, and have plenty of money to continue their mission.”

Tags: , , ,

From Adrian Chen’s smart Gawker interview with technology skeptic supreme Evgeny Morozov, a passage about why “solving” crime might not be such a good idea, though you may disagree if you’ve recently been mugged:

“You can see such solutionist logic that presumes the existence of problems based solely on the availability of nice and quick digital solutions in many walks of life: We have the tools to make government officials more honest and consistent, ergo hypocrisy and inconsistency are problems worth solving. Take crime. We have the means to predict crime—with ‘big data’ and smart algorithms—and prevent it from happening, ergo eliminating crime is a problem worth solving.

But is eliminating crime really a project worth pursuing? Don’t we need to be able to break laws in order to revise them? Once crimes are committed, cases reach the courts, generate debate in the media, and so forth—the very fact that crimes are allowed to happen allows us to revise the norms in question. So the inefficiency of the system—the fact that the crime rate is not zero—-is what saves us from the tyranny of conservatism and complacency that might be the outcome if we delegate crime prevention to algorithms and databases..”

Tags: ,

I’ll believe it when I see it, but Tel Aviv wants to be the first city to use NASA Transport Pods to alleviate traffic congestion. From Peter Coy at Bloomberg Businessweek:

“Transport pods that look like silvery fish could soon be whizzing above the streets of Tel Aviv. The Israeli city is looking to become the world’s first to get a mass-transit system co-developed at NASA’s Ames Research Center, Tel Aviv Mayor Ron Huldai said during a Monday visit to Bloomberg News.

The SkyTran system, which Huldai said could help relieve the traffic congestion that plagues his Mediterranean city, consists of two-person vehicles that hang from rails above street level. The pods are nearly silent because their overhead connectors are levitated by magnetism. Pods pull over on side tracks to pick up and discharge passengers so they don’t slow those behind them. They can travel at speeds up to 150 miles per hour, but in practice would go considerably slower.”

Tags: ,

Food is inefficient, so Rob Rhinehart doesn’t eat anymore. The Atlanta software engineer has created Soylent, a drink that contains the nutrients of a balanced diet without the additives, preservatives and most of the calories. From “This Man Thinks He Never Has To Eat Again,” by Monica Heisey at Vice:

“Question:

How could Soylent affect the world’s eating habits?

Answer:

Consumer behavior has a lot to do with cost and convenience. There are plenty of ways to be healthy, but Americans are more likely to be overweight simply because the food that’s cheap and convenient is unhealthy. I think it’s possible to use technology to make healthy food very cheaply and easily, but we’ll have to give up many traditional foodstuffs like fresh fruits and veggies, which are incompatible with food processing and scale.

Question:

That sounds ominous.

Answer:

I don’t think we need fruits and veggies, though—we need vitamins and minerals. We need carbs, not bread. Amino acids, not milk. It’s still fine to eat these when you want, but not everyone can afford them or has the desire to eat them. Food should be optimized and personalized. If Soylent was as cheap and easy to obtain as a cup of coffee, I think people would be much healthier and healthcare costs would be lower. And I think this is entirely possible.

Question:

And it sounds like it could potentially help with world hunger.

Answer:

Yeah, I’m very optimistic at the prospect of helping developing nations. Soylent can largely be produced from the products of local agriculture, and at that scale, it’s plenty cheap to nourish even the most impoverished individuals. People may giggle when I say I poop a lot less, but this would be a huge deal in the developing world, where inadequate sanitation is a prevalent source of disease. Also, agriculture has a huge impact on the environment, and this diet vastly reduces one’s use of it.”

Tags: ,

in a 1967 video, advertising exec James Nelson  predicted the long-term future of the business–and much of our culture. From Matthew Creamer at Ad Age:

“The eerily spot-on moment you have to see is Mr. Nelson’s vision of a magazine whose content is wholly determined by the age, gender and interests of its reader and laser-beamed right to the home. The ads, too, are perfectly targeted.

Lifetime, the Magazine for You is laser-beamed to a device that prints out the content from under the kitchen sink, next to the garbage disposal. Each copy is unique and the subscription is noncancelable. Says Mr. Nelson in the film, ‘Only the ads that could reasonably appeal to the subscriber are included in his issue and if an advertiser wanted to reach only 28-year-old mothers of three children, boy-girl-boy, that was who they reached … there was 100% coverage and no waste circulation and no matter how the subscriber felt about it, noncancelable.’

It’s easy to see apps like Flipboard and concepts like the filter bubble, if not the whole digital-publishing world, bent on serving up content and ads that are less about the independent vision of an editorial team and more about divining what the reader will actually click on. So in this fun and tossed-off little clip, Mr. Nelson predicted the personalized, data-driven, on-demand future of digital media we’re dealing with today, even if he was, sadly, wrong about the lasers.

‘It was just a thought,’ said Mr. Nelson, when we asked the 91-year-old for his memories of the film. ‘I didn’t think anyone would actually do it.'”

2017 Revisited from Jamie Nelson on Vimeo.

Tags: ,

From an Ask Me Anything on Reddit, Steven Pinker addressing the supposed link between violent video games and actual violence:

Question:

I don’t know if this has been asked yet, Professor, but…

Do you believe in the idea that violent video games could increase violent tendencies in children?

I’ve read a lot about the subject, but to be honest, I’m extremely doubtful that something like a video game could influence someone into hurting someone else.

My belief is that you are who you are, and if you’re going to be violent then you’re bound by fate to that path unless you change yourself. There is no outside influence (besides self-defense) that could make you hurt someone else if you weren’t that type of person.

Thoughts?

Steven Pinker:

There is no good evidence that violent video games cause real-life violence. Christopher Ferguson has reviewed the literature extensively and shown that claims to the contrary are bogus (and the Supreme Court agreed). Just for starters: the era in which video games exploded in popularity is exactly the era in which violent crime among young people plummeted. It’s not true, though, that anyone is fated to be violent. In The Better Angels of Our Nature, I presented a hundred graphs showing rates of violence changing over time, mostly downward. The near-80% decline in US rape since the early 1970s, and the halving of the homicide rate since 1992, are just two examples. Rates of violence respond to certain features of an environment, such as the incentives of an effective police and criminal justice system, and the surrounding norms of legitimate retaliation. They just don’t respond to video games.”

Tags:

I love crowdsourcing but have always been suspicious of its limitations. It’s great for developing a brilliant idea, but can it really ever come up with the brilliant idea? Could it turn out the next iPod? From CNN, a report from SXSW about the first automobile to be designed by crowdsourcing:

“With its orange paint, muscular look and mounted steer horns, an unusual race car has been turning heads on the streets of this capital city.

But that’s not even the most interesting thing about it.

This isRally Fighter, believed to be the first production vehicle to be designed through crowdsourcing, the process of drawing input from a global community of interested people via the Internet.

‘If Henry Ford had had Twitter and Internet access, he surely would have made his automobiles in a very different way,’  said John B. Rogers, president and co-founder of Local Motors, the Arizona car maker that built the Rally Fighter. The company’s slogan: ‘Made by you in America.’

The Rally Fighter is built for speed but has five-point seat belts, not air bags.

Rogers spoke at the South by Southwest Interactive festival in Austin on the use of crowdsourcing to make the best possible automobile in the cheapest and most efficient way.

Local Motors claims that its Rally Fighter is the first vehicle in the world to be created following this principle. Rogers said it was produced in 18 months, about five times faster than through conventional processes.

The design was chosen through a 2009 vote by a community of hundreds of people on the Internet.”

Tags:

101 Ways to Save Apple” is a half-joking, half-serious Wired article from June 1997, the month before Gil Amelio was replaced by a returning Steve Jobs as the near-bankrupt company’s CEO. Some of the serious advice was wrong-minded, though still far better than Fortune‘s coverage from that same year (“Most of the commentary I’ve seen about this decision is off the mark, especially the talk about Jobs coming back to save Apple. That is sheer nonsense. He won’t be anywhere near the company.”). A few excerpts:

“1. Admit it. You’re out of the hardware game. Outsource your hardware production, or scrap it entirely, to compete more directly with Microsoft without the liability of manufacturing boxes.

10. Get a great image campaign. Let’s get some branding (or rebranding) going on. Reproduce the ‘1984’ spot with a 1997 accent.

21. Sell yourself to IBM or Motorola, the PowerPC makers. You can become the computer division that Motorola wants or the alternative within IBM. This would give the company volume for its PowerPC devices and leverage for other PowerPC offerings.

44. Continue your research in voice recognition. It’s the only way you’re going to compete in videoconferencing and remote access.

50. Give Steve Jobs as much authority as he wants in new product development. Let Gil Amelio stick to operations. There’s no excitement at the top, and Apple’s customers want to feel like they’ve joined a computer revolution. Even if Jobs fails, he’ll do it with guns a-blazin’, and we’ll be spared this slow water torture that Amelio has subjected us to.

99. Reincorporate as a nonprofit research foundation. Instead of buying computers, customers would buy memberships, just as they do in the National Geographic Society. They’d receive an Apple computer as part of their membership perks. Dues would be tax-deductible. Your (eventual) profits would also be tax-exempt, and the foundation could continue its noble battle to keep Microsoft on its toes.”

Tags:

From a Slate report by Tom Vanderbilt about a convention of lockpickers, an annual meeting of the original “hackers,” who must gain entry not to steal but because they need to:

“In fairness, the conference, known as LockCon, hosted by TOOOL (The Open Organization of Lockpickers, which demurely describes itself as a ‘growing group of enthusiasts interested in locks, keys and ways of opening locks without keys’) was a far tamer affair than I had expected, given that my visit had been foregrounded with viewings of, for example, a YouTube video showing TOOOL co-founder and president Barry (‘the Key’) Wels—as with hackers, a nickname is often de rigueur for lock pickers—opening a standard hotel door, from the outside, using a bent metal bar.

TOOOL, perhaps not surprisingly given that it spends its time figuring out how to open the world’s locks, is sensitive about its portrayal, and LockCon itself is ‘invitation only.’ As Wels had told me, ‘we spend a lot of time trying to keep the bad guys—or guys with bad intentions—out.’ Those who had gathered were a diverse and almost disappointingly legitimate lot, ranging from German pilots to Spanish locksmiths to a British distributed systems architect working in Iceland, not to mention the crew I had traveled with from Amsterdam in a borrowed RV driven by Wels: Deviant Ollam, Datagram, Scorche (and his girlfriend), and Babak Javadi, all members of the American branch of TOOOL and all employed, in one way or another, in the security business. And while LockCon had a whiff of Stieg Larsson—the hacker speak (e.g., ‘epic fail’) and T-shirts (‘Masters of Penetration’), the Northern European location and demographic tilt—its sense of mischief was largely sealed within the confines of the hostel’s conference rooms where, during the day, attendees sat through intensely technical presentations, and by night, fueled by healthy glasses of the hostel’s all-inclusive lagers, engaged in competitive lock-picking trials.

There is an inevitable lure to picking a lock. ‘A lock is a psychological threshold,’ writes Gaston Bachelard. The physicist Richard Feynman, himself possessed of what he termed the ‘puzzle drive’ and a notorious lock picker, described it as: ‘One guy tries to make something to keep another guy out; there must be a way to beat it!’ I have a firm memory of clicking open the lock on the bathroom door in my childhood home with a bobby-pin; that the lock is what is called in the business a ‘privacy lock,’ designed not at all for security but merely to prevent unintentional intrusions, did not diminish my ardor in that moment.” (Thanks Browser.)

Tags: , ,

During the first Presidential debate last year, the one where Mitt Romney was supposedly so brilliant, he asserted that half of the clean-tech companies President Obama had invested stimulus money in had gone belly up. Not even close. Tesla Motors was one of the businesses he was talking about. They’ve just announced they’re expediting their loan-repayment schedule. From Alan Ohnsman at Bloomberg:

“Tesla Motors Inc. (TSLA), which received $465 million in U.S. Energy Department loans to develop and build electric cars, will repay the funds five years ahead of schedule in a plan approved by the government.

The carmaker said in its annual report yesterday that the department approved amended terms of the loan agreements that enable it to complete repayment by December 2017. Starting in 2015, the Palo Alto, California-based company will make accelerated payments from excess free cash flow, Chief Financial Officer Deepak Ahuja said in a telephone interview.

‘Any remaining balance that’s there at the end of 2017 we’ll pay off as a balloon payment,’ Ahuja said yesterday.

The maker of battery-powered Model S sedans, led by billionaire Elon Musk, has a goal of becoming profitable this quarter, with deliveries of the vehicle forecast to rise to a record 20,000 units in 2013. Production snags in last year’s second half boosted operating expenses and triggered a wider fourth-quarter loss for Tesla than analysts anticipated.

The original terms required repayment of the loans by 2022, 10 years after the funds were drawn down. Tesla said on Sept. 25 that it was working with the Energy Department on a modified repayment schedule. Amended terms of the loan agreements were registered on Dec. 20 and March 1, the company said yesterday.”

Tags: , , ,

prcp

Why wouldn’t the new budget proposed by Paul Ryan, who seems to forget that he lost the election, not drive Americans out into the streets screaming? It calls for austerity for people who can least afford it, in this time of ever-increasing income disparity, when only few have felt the effects of the recovery. Maybe it’s partly because our pockets hold those shiny smartphones, amulets equally for the rich and poor, which make it seem like anything is possible, that things will change. But what if that change is not for the better? From “Upgrade or Die,” George Packer’s commentary on the New Yorker site:

“My unprovable hypothesis is that obsessive upgrading and chronic stagnation are intimately related, in the same way that erotic fantasies are related to sexual repression. The fetish that surrounds Google Glass or the Dow average grows ever more hysterical as the economic status of the majority of Americans remains flat. When things don’t work in the realm of stuff, people turn to the realm of bits. If the physical world becomes intransigent, you can take refuge in the virtual world, where you can solve problems–how do I make a video of my skydiving adventure while keeping my hands free?—that most of your countrymen didn’t know existed. [Evgeny] Morozov puts it this way: ‘Last year the futurist Ayesha Khanna even described smart contact lenses that could make homeless people disappear from view, ‘enhancing our basic sense’ and, undoubtedly, making our lives so much more enjoyable. In a way, this does solve the problem of homelessness—unless, of course, you happen to be a homeless person.’

The strange thing is that technological romanticism doesn’t divide Americans. In an age when class and wealth determine everything from your food and beverage to your TV shows, news sources, mode of air travel, education, spouse, children’s prospects, longevity, and cause of death, it’s the one thing that still unites us. I know a man in Tampa who was out of work for nine months after losing his job at Walmart, and more than once almost ended up on the street with his wife and two children. Last week, he was finally hired by a food conglomerate to drive from one convenience store to another, checking the condition of snack bags on the shelves. Like the unemployed Italian man in The Bicycle Thief who gets hired to put up movie posters and has to pawn his wedding sheets to buy the bike required for the job, the Tampa family had to sell some of their DVDs so the father could buy decent clothes and shoes and pay for gas.

But he didn’t need to purchase a smart phone. He already had one. And in the future, when the price drops below its current fifteen hundred dollars, the unemployed might wear Google Glass, too. Perhaps it will allow them to disappear from their own field of vision.”

Tags: , ,

Jenny McCarthy And Jim Carrey Host Green Our Vaccines Press Conference

Even though the Digital Age is supposed to be an equalizer–and perhaps still will be–we’re deeply divided in terms of wealth in many ways. Our culture has never been better and worse. We know so much but believe so much bullshit. The opening of “Beyond Belief,” Michael Hanlon’s new Aeon essay:

“We live, we like to think, in a reasoning age, if not always a reasonable one. Over the past century we have seen spectacular advances in our understanding of the universe. We now have a fairly coherent, if incomplete, picture of how our planet came into being, its age and place in the cosmos, and how the physical world works. We, clever monkeys that we are, understand the processes that lead to earthquakes and volcanic eruptions, and the factors that influence climate and weather. We have seen the rise of molecular biology and major improvements in public health and medicine, giving billions of people longer, healthier lives.

Indeed, life expectancy is on the rise nearly everywhere. Infant mortality continues to plummet. Humanity has actually managed to eradicate one of the greatest scourges of its existence — smallpox — and we are well on the way to destroying another — polio. It is astonishing, this triumph of reason. As a species, we should be proud.

But of course it is not that simple. As the ideals and technological spin-offs of the Enlightenment make our world ever more unified, unreason continues to flourish. This is something that many thinkers find to be as puzzling as it is distasteful.”

Tags:

In my experience, female executives are no better or worse than their male counterparts, though, of course, there should be no glass ceilings. But you can’t expect a scheme to change just because there are some new schemers. Judith Shulevitz, whose excellent work I first encountered when she was editing the late, great Lingua Franca, explains in a New Republic piece why a women’s movement can accomplish things that successful boardroom executives like Sheryl Sandberg can’t, no matter how high they rise:

“Competent female executives run better companies than incompetent male executives, but they’re no more likely to make universal day care the law of the land. If Davos Woman had dominated feminist discourse when the Triangle Shirtwaist fire killed nearly 130 female sweatshop laborers in 1911, would she have pushed for the legislation that came out of that tragedy—the fire codes and occupancy limits that made workplaces safer for women, and men, for generations to come?

America’s women’s movements helped deliver a fairer world for everyone—upper-middle class, middle class, and working class—not because they produced more leaders, but because those leaders, and the rank-and-file who worked with them and even went to jail with them, changed the rules of society. They helped women get the vote, abortion access, domestic-abuse statutes, and the Family and Medical Leave Act, de minimis as that is. No corporate boss, even one as gallantly outspoken as Sandberg, can match that.”

Tags: ,

One I’ve finished the book I’m currently reading, I’m going to get my hands on Susan Jacoby’s The Great Agnostic, a volume about the 19th-century orator and non-believer Robert Ingersoll, which I’ve posted about before. From “That Old-Time Irreligion,” Jennifer Michael Hecht’s piece in the New York Times Book Review, an explanation of why the historical figure is largely forgotten today:

“The first reason for his obscurity is the same reason many actors who were well known before the age of film have been forgotten: Ingersoll’s greatest fame came from his public speeches, and while the texts of these have been published, it was his performance of them that made him so beloved. In 19th-century America, speeches were a major form of entertainment. As a result, people were real connoisseurs of the craft, and a wide range of listeners thought Ingersoll was an extraordinary orator. In an age when flowery language and effusive emotion were commonly used to keep audiences rapt, Ingersoll was comparatively calm and plain-spoken, yet he was said to be riveting, drawing both tears and peals of laughter.

The second reason he isn’t remembered has to do with what was in those speeches, many of which denounced religion. He called himself agnostic, but whenever he was asked, he replied that for him there was no difference between agnosticism and atheism. He wrote and spoke about a number of topics — Shakespeare was a favorite — but his agnosticism was what most set him apart, attracting devoted followers and fervent detractors. There have been atheists and religious doubters throughout history, but the ones who remain famous after their deaths tend to have been equally famous for something else as well; otherwise, people most notable for their bravery in the face of religious conservatism have to be celebrated by a population equally brave, and that is often too much to ask.”

Tags: , , ,

If it weren’t for Robert Reich, Rachel Maddow would be the most adorable communist in America. The MSNBC host just did an Ask Me Anything on Reddit. A few exchanges follow.

_______________________

 Question:

If you could go back in time and cover any news story in history as it unfolded, which would you pick?

Rachel Maddow:

Maybe the presidential election of 1800? A tie! Decided in Congress! Aaron Burr! All that weird campaigning they had never done before! I find electoral politics mostly enervating, but that one sounds like it would have been a blast.

_______________________

Question: 

Is there anyone at another cable news channel that you really admire as a broadcaster?

Rachel Maddow:

I really like the way Shep Smith (at Fox News Channel) balances anchorman gravitas… with a willingness to put the artifice aside and acknowledge what it really going on. Some of us can pull off seeming like human beings on TV, some of us can pull off V.O.G. authority, but Shep is really very good at both. Better than anyone else, I think. Also, I’ve met him and he’s a nice person!

_______________________

Question:

Our family hung the Rolling Stone photo of you, shooting a Henry Big Boy rifle, on the front of our refrigerator. (We love you and we love repeater rifles.) Do you think the gun legislation and conversion currently brewing in the US would be more efficient if more liberals, who occasionally like to get their cowgirl on, came out of the closet? I really don’t see why the topic ends up being so right wing vs left wing. I feel like there should be much more overlap between the camps.

Rachel Maddow:

Two things: (1) I agree! I think this issue is way more polarized in politics than it is in real life. Gun appreciation, even gun enthusiasm (which I confess to in a small way!) is absolutely not inconsistent with a belief in rational gun-safety reform. It’s weird that we think of the political battle as gun-lovers versus gun-haters — do you know a single gun-lover (who doesn’t work in the political side of the gun movement) who thinks it makes sense for someone adjudicated mentally ill to be barred from buying a gun from a guy at a store, but allowed to buy a guy under a tent or at a convention center? Also, (2) would you please do me the favor of drawing a tiny little moustache on that picture on your fridge?

_______________________

Question:

What was it like meeting Howard Stern? That was a great interview; I bought your book afterward.

Rachel Maddow:

Thanks! I love Howard Stern. I was intimidated to meet him just in a fangirl kind of way. But also because I knew he would ask me questions about sex that would make me blush like a cardinal. Once I realized that I could just tell him “no, i’m not answering that!” — then it was just pure fun. That was one of the best interviews I have ever been part of.

_______________________

When Howard met Rachel:

Tags: ,

One more post about Elon Musk’s SXSW appearance, this one a passage from a Los Angeles Times’ report, which touches on his plans for the hyperloop:

“Saturday’s hour-long keynote at the Austin Convention Center covered a wide variety of topics, including Musk’s thoughts on solar panels and higher education, battery cells, his role models (Benjamin Franklin, Steve Jobs, Jeff Bezos and Nikola Tesla) and his idea for a new mode of high-speed transportation dubbed the ‘hyperloop.’

‘It would be something that would be twice as fast as a plane, at least, in terms of total transit time,’ Musk said. ‘It would be immune to weather, incapable of crashing pretty much unless it was a terrorist attack, and the ticket price would be half of a plane.’

As for whether the hyperloop would run underground or above ground, Musk said, ‘it could be either.'”

Tags:

Via Joshua Keating at Foreign Policy, an excerpt from “Some Far-out Thoughts on Computers,” CIA Analyst Orrin Clotworthy’s 1962 memo about the future of Big Data:

As a final thought, how about a machine that would send via closed-circuit television visual and oral information needed immediately at high-level conferences or briefings? Let’s say that a group of senior officers are contemplating a covert action program for Afghanistan. Things go well until someone asks, ‘Well, just how many schools are there in the country, and what is the literacy rate?’ No one in the room knows. (Remember, this is an imaginary situation.) So the junior member present dials a code number into a device at one end of the table. Thirty seconds later, on the screen overhead, a teletype printer begins to hammer out the required data. Before the meeting is over, the group has been given through the same method the names of countries that have airlines into Afghanistan, a biographical profile of the Soviet ambassador there, and the Pakistani order of battle along the Afghanistan frontier. Neat, no?”

Tags: ,

The Internet has destroyed several industries with its creative destruction and will level many more, but we’ve all benefited from it in numerous ways. But how do we quantify those benefits? The opening of a new Economist article that tries to do just that:

“WHEN her two-year-old daughter was diagnosed with cancer in 1992, Judy Mollica spent hours in a nearby medical library in south Florida, combing through journals for information about her child’s condition. Upon seeing an unfamiliar term she would stop and hunt down its meaning elsewhere in the library. It was, she says, like ‘walking in the dark.’ Her daughter recovered but in 2005 was diagnosed with a different form of cancer. This time, Ms Mollica was able to stay by her side. She could read articles online, instantly look up medical and scientific terms on Wikipedia, and then follow footnotes to new sources. She could converse with her daughter’s specialists like a fellow doctor. Wikipedia, she says, not only saved her time but gave her a greater sense of control. ‘You can’t put a price on that.’

Measuring the economic impact of all the ways the internet has changed people’s lives is devilishly difficult because so much of it has no price. It is easier to quantify the losses Wikipedia has inflicted on encyclopedia publishers than the benefits it has generated for users like Ms Mollica. This problem is an old one in economics. GDP measures monetary transactions, not welfare. Consider someone who would pay $50 for the latest Harry Potter novel but only has to pay $20. The $30 difference represents a non-monetary benefit called ‘consumer surplus.’ The amount of internet activity that actually shows up in GDP—Google’s ad sales, for example—significantly understates its contribution to welfare by excluding the consumer surplus that accrues to Google’s users. The hard question to answer is by how much.”

Elon Musk, who’s currently trying to do bigger, bolder things than any other technologist or industrialist on the planet, is planning on soon building a launch site for SpaceX, most likely in Texas. From a TechCrunch report on his SXSW appearance:

“Part of the reason he is here in Texas is to meet with Texas legislature to talk about launch facilities. Elon detailed that SpaceX really needs a third launch site besides Cape Canaveral and Vandenberg; they need a commercial launch facility and they need to be able to launch Eastward and near the equator. As a state, Texas is the leading candidate, but other states are being considered. They have some things to work through like making sure beaches can be closed. If everything works out though, in the best case, SpaceX could  be start starting construction next year on a facility in Texas. Launches could happen within two to three years.”

Tags:

From the UK version of Wired, a passage about Esther Dyson suggesting we expedite the personalization of medicine, which will definitely happen, though no one knows when:

“‘They personalise my adverts, why can’t they personalise my medicine?’ Esther Dyson, serial investor and chairwoman of EDventures, uttered these words at London Web Summit, arguing that one of the greatest areas ripe for innovation for startups now is the healthcare sector.

Wired magazine editor David Rowan, interviewing Dyson at the conference on 1 March, pointed out that we don’t yet have personalised medicine because of the time and costs involved in human drug trials. This, says Dyson, should not stop us innovating, inventing and investing in products that will improve the general population’s health.

‘Most drugs are not totally effective for most of the population,,’ said Dyson. ‘They’re about 100 percent effective for 30 percent of the population and probably toxic for 20 percent. But if you know the genetics, drugs are going to be much better for the population.’

Five years from now, she argued, you won’t take serious medicine without knowing it’ll work for you. We will have moved away from trying and taking and hoping it will work — ‘currently,’ pointed out Dyson, ‘I get the same dose of a drug as 500 pound guy.'”

Tags:

An aging and lonely particle physics professor from America meets what appears to be a gorgeous, young Czechoslovakian bikini model online. Despite his intelligence and experience, he willfully ignores every tell and signal that the truth is something else–and something dangerous. From “The Professor, the Bikini Model and the Suitcase Full of Trouble,” Maxine Swann’s new feature in the New York Times Magazine:

“Frampton didn’t plan on a long trip. He needed to be back to teach. So he left his car at the airport. Soon, he hoped, he’d be returning with Milani on his arm. The first thing that went wrong was that the e-ticket Milani sent Frampton for the Toronto-Santiago leg of his journey turned out to be invalid, leaving him stranded in the Toronto airport for a full day. Frampton finally arrived in La Paz four days after he set out. He hoped to meet Milani the next morning, but by then she had been called away to another photo shoot in Brussels. She promised to send him a ticket to join her there, so Frampton, who had checked into the Eva Palace Hotel, worked on a physics paper while he waited for it to arrive. He and Milani kept in regular contact. A ticket to Buenos Aires eventually came, with the promise that another ticket to Brussels was on the way. All Milani asked was that Frampton do her a favor: bring her a bag that she had left in La Paz.

While in Bolivia, Frampton corresponded with an old friend, John Dixon, a physicist and lawyer who lives in Ontario. When Frampton explained what he was up to, Dixon became alarmed. His warnings to Frampton were unequivocal, Dixon told me not long ago, still clearly upset: “I said: ‘Well, inside that suitcase sewn into the lining will be cocaine. You’re in big trouble.’ Paul said, ‘I’ll be careful, I’ll make sure there isn’t cocaine in there and if there is, I’ll ask them to remove it.’ I thought they were probably going to kidnap him and torture him to get his money. I didn’t know he didn’t have money. I said, ‘Well, you’re going to be killed, Paul, so whom should I contact when you disappear?’”

Tags: ,

I think more than most that people will be surprisingly accepting of nanotechnology as medicine in the same way they’ve been open, even inviting, of nonstop surveillance. Father-and-son futurists Ray and Ethan Kurzweil don’t necessarily agree with that view in a new Wall Street Journal interview conducted by Amir Efrati. An excerpt:

WSJ: 

What will happen technologically in the next five years?

Ray Kurzweil: 

My message is the law of accelerating returns and how remarkably predictable the exponential growth of IT is. More and more things become IT, like health and medicine. There will be 3-D printing, augmented reality.

Ethan Kurzweil: 

Every step along the way will freak people out.

Ray Kurzweil:

With nanodevices that will be implanted in our bodies to repair us, putting technology in our bloodstream, lots of people will opt out at first.”

Tags: , ,

I have never been on a cruise and hope to never go on one. Those ships are floating bacteria factories and if not entirely lawless, a lot less lawful than they should be. A former Senior Officer of a luxury cruise line just did an Ask Me Anything on Reddit. His introductory comments are below, followed by a few exchanges.

“Couple little known facts: The ship has a morgue. Officers mess can be 5 star dining, personal waiters and everything. Most of what you see on the love boat is total bullshit. Officers mess has beer available at breakfast, lunch, and dinner. The laundry, mostly staffed with Chinese crew, had people who hadn’t seen the sun in a year. It’s really hard to get kicked off a ship, you have to fuck up royally. Only 2 things will get you booted. If you mess up the experience for a significant number of people, or create a safety hazard (like calling in a fake man overboard)”

_______________________

Question:

Were there any mysterious deaths on your lines? Do you believe that the cruise lines cover up deaths in order to avoid bad publicity?

Answer:

Renaissance was called a line for the newly weds and nearly deads. Frankly, few else could afford it. That said, we had deaths, and a tiny morgue. Heart attacks were not that uncommon either. You have to consider a few things. One, if some dies in a hotel, no one blames the hotel. If you die on a cruise ship, something mysterious must have happened. Second, the cruise ship while in International waters has no governing body or laws outside of the captain, and international maritime laws. What that means is, the captain is god, jury, and executioner on the vessel. I have not seen any cover-ups regarding deaths, but I certainly believe it happens. Frankly, knowing what I know I’m surprised more people don’t go missing. A cruise is the perfect way to vanish, or make someone vanish easily.

_______________________

Question:

Are you talking literally haven’t seen the sun for a year? There has to be some health consequences to spending a bunch of your life under deck.

Answer:

Over a year, yes. These guys would work nights and sleep all day. In fact, they wouldn’t go into port on their days off, just to save money. We had to drag one guy off the ship for his break after the contract, he wanted to keep working. They can make 20k a year in cash. A couple years and go back to china and apparently live very well.

_______________________

Question:

Whats the best part of being at sea for that long? To counter, what is the the hardest part?

Answer:

I saw the world. I saw monkeys snag a drink from the udder of a wandering cow in india, drank Cobra blood in thailand, went to Ephesus and visited the worlds oldest brothel, and had many lonely nights at sea. It was really hard on the long stretches, you get sea legs and are wobbly when you get in port. Being at sea means not having to deal with port issues, inspections, customs, loading of goods, unloading of trash, etc. It’s those lonely long nights of not wanting steak and lobster or free booze. The shimmer fades quickly when it’s your life.

_______________________

Question:

Most wtf thing you’ve seen on the job?

Answer:

I’m probably going to get sued for talking about this, but it was the presidents guest. The president of a cruise line I won’t name invited sent some friends on a free cruise, and this guy went ape shit. He forgot his meds, got smashed, and starting going after people with a steak knife, trying to find a hostage. He was thrown in the brig, and AIR lifted off via helicopter for repatriation. I don’t know how it was kept quiet, but I imagine some people got some free cruises to shut up about it.

_______________________

Question:

When betting on Monkey Knife Fights – what do you look for? 

Answer:

Strong legs, because monkey knife fights end up on the ground in a few seconds. Generally, I go with whomever Mr. Burns bets on.•

_______________________

Now in Spanish!:

Manti Te’o’s “girlfriend” was only slightly less authentic than a Kardashian, and none of us is exactly the same person virtually as we are actually. In this blend of reality and unreality that is our world now, the line gets blurred for some people.

From that wonderful Awl blog, an excerpt from “The Hoax Exposer,” Molly Shalgos’ interview with Taryn Wright, a Chicago day trader who exposes Internet fakes in her spare time:

Question:

What’s the general reaction of a person perpetrating this kind of hoax when you first confront them?

Taryn Wright:

It’s been bizarre. I usually send them the blog entry and they immediately delete their page. I ask if we can talk and most give me their phone number. A huge number of them begin to consider me a friend. I’m Facebook friends with three of them, and I text and email with three more.

They don’t seem angry with me. It’s almost like it’s a relief that someone made them stop.

Question:

Do any of them seek out any kind of mental help after they’re uncovered?

Taryn Wright:

A few of them have. I’ve helped a couple find therapists. A lot of them have been pathologically lying from an early age and some have already been through therapy. One of them had a Munchausen by Internet diagnosis.

Question:

Ohhh, let’s do some talking about Munchausen By Internet. Explain that one, please!

Taryn Wright:

Well, it’s not formally recognized by the psychology establishment, but a psychiatrist named Marc Feldman coined the term in the early ’00s. It’s a form of Munchausen syndrome, but instead of faking sick, or making their children or family members sick for attention, the person with MBI pretends to be sick online.

They go into support groups and spin tragic stories and hog attention. If they’re caught, they usually delete their profiles and move on to a new support group.

Question:

How many documented cases of that have there been?

Taryn Wright:

An awful lot. Dr. Feldman has seen a few hundred by now.”

 

Tags: ,

« Older entries § Newer entries »