Jane Wakefield

You are currently browsing articles tagged Jane Wakefield.

comaashley (1)

How long will our species or some next-level version of it continue to exist? If we go on long enough, it’s not theoretically impossible that humans could replace our old “parts” with new bio-printed ones. A kidney here, a kidney there, it all adds up. Or maybe they’ll be remarkably good bioengineering that will allow us to repair and upgrade what we have, regardless of its condition. I said “we,” but we actually won’t enjoy these marvels. Perhaps some future iteration of us will.

From “The Father and Son Planning Meat-Free Immortality,” Jane Wakefield’s BBC piece about the very ambitious Forgacs family: 

Organovo was set up by Hungarian-born Dr Forgacs, after he made the decision to quit his career as a theoretical physicist and retrain as a biologist – taking classes with undergraduates.

Those classes left him with a pretty lofty ambition – to grow organs that could mimic or even improve on existing ones.

He set about developing a process to print multi-cellular tissues – dubbed bio-printing – in 2005, and two years later founded Organovo with colleagues Keith Murphy and Dr Eric Michael David.

Its ultimate aim is to mass produce organs that could create a future in which humans, like cars, have regular services that keep them living indefinitely.

“If we could replace organs, we could live forever, and then it is up to us whether we want that,” he told the audience at the recent Wired conference in London.

He admits there is currently a lot of hype around bio-printing, particularly the idea of “growing” full organs.

“Bio-printing does not result in a viable biological structure. We cannot yet make big structures like livers or hearts,” he said.

“If it is possible, it will take a long time, so don’t smoke or drink too much.”•

Tags: , ,

  • The human brain is the most amazingly complex machine, until the day it becomes a simple one. If we last long enough, that moment will arrive, and consciousness will no longer be the hard problem or any problem at all.
  • I don’t think intelligent machines are happening anytime soon, but they’re likely if the Anthropocene or some other age doesn’t claim us first. In fact, we may ultimately become them, more or less. But I’m not talking about today or tomorrow. In the meanwhile, Weak AI will be enough of a boon and bane to occupy us.
  • The problem I have with concerned technologists attempting to curb tomorrow’s superintelligence today is that any prescripts we create now will become moot soon enough as realities shift. New answers will alter old questions. It’s better to take an incremental approach to these challenges, and try to think through them wisely in our era and trust future humans to do the same in theirs.

From Jane Wakefield’s BBC article “Intelligent Machines: Do We Really Need to Fear AI?“:

Already operating on the South Korean border is a sentry robot, dubbed SGR-1. Its heat-and-motion sensors can identify potential targets more than two miles away. Currently it requires a human before it shoots the machine gun that it carries but it raises the question – who will be responsible if the robots begin to kill without human intervention?

The use of autonomous weapons is something that the UN is currently discussing and has concluded that humans must always have meaningful control over machines.

Noel Sharkey co-founded the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots and believes there are several reasons why we must set rules for future battlefield bots now.

“One of the first rules of many countries is about preserving the dignity of human life and it is the ultimate human indignity to have a machine kill you,” he said.

But beyond that moral argument is a more strategic one which he hopes military leaders will take on board.

“The military leaders might say that you save soldiers’ lives by sending in machines instead but that is an extremely blinkered view. Every country, including China, Russia and South Korea is developing this technology and in the long run, it is going to disrupt global security,” he said.

“What kind of war will be initiated when we have robots fighting other robots? No-one will know how the other ones are programmed and we simply can’t predict the outcome.”

Tags: ,

Sheer coolness aside, a network of hover cars suspended by a magnetic track doesn’t sound like the future of transportation to me. But that’s what skyTran is planning to build in Israel. From Jane Wakefield at the BBC:

“A 500m loop will be built on the campus of Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI) followed by a commercial network, according to skyTran, the company that will build it.

Two-person vehicles will be suspended from elevated magnetic tracks, as an alternative transport method to congested roads, the firm promised.

The system should be up and running by the end of 2015.

The firm hopes the test track will prove that the technology works and lead to a commercial version of the network.

The plan is to allow passengers to order a vehicle on their smartphone to meet them at a specific station and then head directly to their destination.”

Tags:

"The algorithms used by Amazon to set and update prices started outbidding each other." (Image by J.J. Harrison.)

Algorithms increasingly run many aspect of our lives, but sometimes this computer-generated math we can barely comprehend runs amok. An excerpt from a cautionary tale about algorithms by Jane Wakefield at the BBC:

“At last month’s TEDGlobal conference, algorithm expert Kevin Slavin delivered one of the tech show’s most ‘sit up and take notice’ speeches where he warned that the ‘maths that computers use to decide stuff’ was infiltrating every aspect of our lives.

Among the examples he cited were a robo-cleaner that maps out the best way to do housework, and the online trading algorithms that are increasingly controlling Wall Street.

‘We are writing these things that we can no longer read,’ warned Mr Slavin.

‘We’ve rendered something illegible. And we’ve lost the sense of what’s actually happening in this world we’ve made.’

Algorithms may be cleverer than humans but they don’t necessarily have our sense of perspective – a failing that became evident when Amazon’s price-setting code went to war with itself earlier this year.

The Making of a Fly – a book about the molecular biology of a fly from egg to fully-fledged insect – may have been a riveting read but it almost certainly didn’t deserve a price tag of $23.6m (£14.3m).

It hit that figure briefly on the site after the algorithms used by Amazon to set and update prices started outbidding each other.

It is a small taste of the chaos that can be caused when code gets smart enough to operate without human intervention, thinks Mr Slavin.

‘This is algorithms in conflict without any adult supervision,’ he said.”

••••••••••

Slavin’s TED Talk about algorithms infiltrating our lives:

Tags: ,