From Dan Tapscott’s Globe and Mail piece about the latest book from Ray Kurzweil, that lightning rod, about the current and future merger of human and machine: 

“The thesis of How to Create a Mind is that the human brain itself is the most powerful thinking machine available today, so it is logical that we look to the brain for guidance on how to make devices smarter. He outlines a theory he calls ‘the pattern recognition theory of mind (PRTM),’ which he says ‘describes the basic algorithm of the neocortex (the region of the brain responsible for perception, memory and critical thinking).’ By reverse-engineering the human brain, we will be able to ‘to vastly extend the power of our own intelligence.’

What will we do with this new intelligence? First, we will better understand the brain itself and develop superior treatments for the brain’s ailments, such as psychiatric disorders. Second, we will use our expanded intelligence to solve the many problems that confront mankind. Finally, we will use the intelligence to teach us how to be smarter.

I have written often about today’s smartphones evolving into digital co-pilots, our constant companions that will help us get through the day. Kurzweil sees such devices shrinking to microscopic size and residing within our bodies. Will we have tiny computers in our bloodstream, ever alert for something amiss? These devices will be our links to what is now called the cloud, the vast computing power of the Googles, the Amazons, the Apples and the IBMs of the world.”

Tags: ,

I missed Jared Diamond’s essay “Tales From the World Before Yesterday” when it was published at Edge on the last day of 2012. A passage about what he learned from his travels to New Guinea, where he encountered humanity as it was until very recently:

“I first went to New Guinea 41 years ago to study birds and to have adventures. I knew intellectually that New Guineans constituted most of the world’s last remaining ‘primitive peoples,’ who until a few decades ago still used stone tools, little clothing, and no writing. That was what the whole world used to be like until 7,000 years ago, a mere blink of an eye in the history of the human species. Only in a couple of other parts of the world besides New Guinea did our original long-prevailing ‘primitive’ ways survive into the 20th century.

Stone tools, little clothing, and no writing proved to be only the least of the differences between our past and our present. There were other differences that I noticed within my first year in New Guinea: murderous hostility towards any stranger, marriageable young people having no role in choosing their spouse, lack of awareness of the existence of an outside world, and routine multi-lingualism from childhood.

But there were also more profound features, which took me a long time even to notice, because they are so at odds with modem experience that neither New Guineans nor I could even articulate them. Each of us took some aspects of our lifestyle for granted and couldn’t conceive of an alternative. Those other New Guinea features included the non-existence of ‘friendship’ (associating with someone just because you like them), a much greater awareness of rare hazards, war as an omnipresent reality, morality in a world without judicial recourse, and a vital role of very old people.”

Tags:

A New Jersey piano salesman who used to be a hypnotist decides to get back into his former profession. At one of his first gigs, he puts a man under and steps on his stomach. At that moment, the man suffers an aortic aneurysm and dies. But other hypnotists hear of the incident and insist the man is just in a trance and rush to the morgue to “wake him up.” The original hypnotist is arrested and will likely be charged with manslaughter. Serious journalists begin to wonder if hypnosis is “another narcotic poison.”

Well, at least no one was sawed in half. An excerpt from the November 10, 1909 New York Times article:

Somerville, N.J.--All the hypnotists, mesmerists, and other varieties of trance inducers in the country seemed to be trying to get into communication with this place to-day to offer suggestions to ‘Prof.’ Arthur Everton as how to awaken Robert Simpson, who died last night in the cataleptic state into which Everton had thrown him during an exhibition of ‘stunts’ in the Somerville Opera House.

William E. Davenport of Newark, an amateur hypnotist of some note, spent a long time over Simpson’s body in the dead room of the hospital this afternoon trying the awakening process. He touched the dead man’s cheeks and bent over him, alternately whispering and shouting invitations to him to come to life.

‘Bob, your heart action–attend. Listen, Bob, your heart action is strong, Bob, your heart begins to beat. Bob, [loud] do you hear me? Bob, [whispering] your heart is starting.’

But Simpson was beyond awakening–dead of a rupture of the aorta, as a subsequent autopsy disclosed, and Everton, the hypnotist, seems likely to-night to have to stand trial on a charge of manslaughter. He has employed counsel and will fight the case. It is suggested here that he may make the novel plea that the man was still alive when the autopsy was performed, citing various cases of suspended animation as proof of this. Dr. John Quackenbos, Professor Emeritus of Columbia University and one of the leading authorities on hypnotism in the country, said this afternoon before the autopsy was made that it was not likely that Simpson’s was a case of suspended animation, and that an autopsy should be attempted with caution or perhaps deferred until there was no possibility of life.

But the autopsy was made, and seems to have disposed effectually of the suspended animation theory. Eight physicians assisted in it. They issued a statement at its close that death was due to rupture of the aorta, one of the great blood vessels close to the heart. This indicated to the Coroner that death was primarily due to natural causes and that the man had probably been suffering for some time from an aneurysm or similar affection of the ruptured vessel. Death was practically instantaneous and evidently occurred just as Simpson was coming out of the trance into which Everton had thrown him.

‘Prof.’ Everton, who was recently a piano salesman in Newark, and before that a traveling hypnotist, began an engagement at the Somerville ‘Opera House’ on Monday night. He was just starting out anew on his old business of hypnotizing; he had finished a week at the Arcade Theatre in Newark, where he had done well. Manager Weldon of the Somerville ‘Opera House’ was sure that he had a better hypnotist than Manager Ralph Edwards of the Bijou Theatre, a few blocks further up Main Street. …

Monday afternoon the ‘Professor,’ just to show Manager Weldon that he could make good, hypnotized the ticket girl at the Opera House, the pianist, and one of Mr. Weldon’s female singers. He promised that at the night show he would not only do the ordinary hypnotic stunts, but would put a man into a cataleptic state and stand on his stomach. Manager Weldon went out and invited all the local physicians to come and witness this performance, and roped off seats for the profession. Three physicians were there.

Everton, a tall, black-haired, black-mustached man of about 35, with a suave manner, made his subjects fish on the stage floor and otherwise amuse the audience. Then for a climax he announced that he would put Simpson, a big, blowsy man into the cataleptic state.

He made a few passes, told Simpson to be rigid, and he was. Everton then had his assistants lay the body on two chairs, the head resting on one and the feet on the other, and stepped up on the subject’s stomach and then down again. Two attendants, acting under his orders, lifted Simpson to a standing posture, and Everton, clapping his hands, cried out ‘Relax!’

Simpson’s body softened so suddenly that it slipped out of the hands of the attendants to the floor, his head striking one of the chairs as he slid down.”

Tags: , , , , ,

A clip from the 1978 short, “Libra,” which imagined a 21st-century Libertarian space utopia, population 10,000, including its market-loving African-American leader. Just amazing.

See also:

Jeff Howe of Wired has a new interview with the The Innovator’s Dilemma author Clayton Christensen. A passage about the industries (no surprises, really) most prone to the creative disturbance of our Digital Age:

“Jeff Howe:

If you had to list some industries right now that are either in a state of disruptive crisis or will be soon, what would they be?

Clayton Christensen:  

Journalism, certainly, and publishing broadly. Anything supported by advertising. That all of this is being disrupted is now beyond question. And then I think higher education is just on the edge of the crevasse. Generally, universities are doing very well financially, so they don’t feel from the data that their world is going to collapse. But I think even five years from now these enterprises are going to be in real trouble.

Jeff Howe: 

Why is higher education vulnerable?

Clayton Christensen

The availability of online learning. It will take root in its simplest applications, then just get better and better. You know, Harvard Business School doesn’t teach accounting anymore, because there’s a guy out of BYU whose online accounting course is so good. He is extraordinary, and our accounting faculty, on average, is average.

Jeff Howe: 

What happens to all our institutions of advanced learning?

Clayton Christensen

Some will survive. Most will evolve hybrid models, in which universities license some courses from an online provider like Coursera but then provide more-specialized courses in person. Hybrids are actually a principle regardless of industry. If you want to use a new technology in a mainstream existing market, it has to be a hybrid. It’s like the electric car. If you want to have a viable electric car, you have to ask if there is a market where the customers want a car that won’t go far or fast. The answer is, parents of teenagers would love to put their teens in a car that won’t go far or fast. Little by little, the technology will emerge to take it on longer trips. But if you want to have this new technology employed on the California freeways right now, it has to be a hybrid like a Prius, where you take the best of the old with the best of the new.” (Thanks Browser.)

Tags: ,

I want every book in the history of humankind digitized and available online to read right now. But Christopher Rowe isn’t sure that a universal library is possible or even a good thing. The opening of “The New Library of Babel?“:

“The utopian idea of the universal library, a repository of every text ever published, has persisted in the western mind for over two millennia. The Library of Alexandria, founded in the third century BCE, is generally regarded as the first and, practically speaking, last such endeavour, an attempt to house and catalogue all of the texts (which were at that time primarily in the form of papyrus scrolls) in the then known world. Tradition holds that the collection was decimated by a fire, though the true fate of the Library of Alexandria is debatable; its existence and the comprehensiveness of its archives, however, are attested to by numerous sources. Now, with the rise of digital media, virtual storage and the World Wide Web, many claim that the ancient dream of a universal library is approaching realisation, albeit in a new and very different form. The Google Books Library Project, the undertaking most often singled out as the modern equivalent of the Library of Alexandria, has reportedly compiled over 20 million scanned volumes, largely obtained from the collections of its 20 prominent partner libraries. Google’s stated objective at the inception of this project was no less than ‘to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful’ Other proponents of the project have been even more hyperbolic; Kevin Kelly declared in a New York Times article that this new universal library would eventually offer ‘the entire works of humankind, from the beginning of recorded history, in all languages, available to all people, all the time’, including in its scope digital versions of all paintings, films, recorded music, television programs, every piece of print media and every internet site ever to have existed.

The idea of electronically storing and delivering vast collections of texts is older than most would imagine. In 1960, Ted Nelson, the inventor of the term ‘hypertext’, began working on (but never completed) the Xanadu system, a proposed ‘docuverse’ which he later described as ‘a plan for a worldwide network, intended to serve hundreds of millions of users simultaneously from the corpus of the world’s stored writings, graphics and data’. Nelson in turn drew inspiration from a 1945 article by Vannevar Bush, one of the first to seriously consider the logistics and possibilities of such a system. However, I wish to draw the reader’s attention to an even earlier and more indirect theorisation of the universal digital library, one found in Jorge Luis Borges’s 1941 short story ‘The Library of Babel’. In this work, a nameless narrator describes the titular library as a seemingly endless vertical and horizontal series of hexagonal rooms housing 20 bookshelves apiece, the contents of which are described as follows: ‘each bookshelf holds 32 books identical in format; each book contains 410 pages; each page, 40 lines; each line, approximately 80 black letters.’ The contents of these books are revealed to be randomly generated combinations of a set of 25 characters: 22 letters representing all vowel and consonant sounds, the comma, the period and the space. This library, whose spatial dimensions would vastly exceed those of the observable universe, would by definition contain everything that has been, or possibly ever could be, expressed in writing; yet for every sentence, much less volume, of interpretable language there would exist galaxies of meaningless or indecipherable strings of characters. While the library Borges describes here (and in his essay ‘The Total Library,’ written two years prior to the story) does not resemble in content the universal library proposed by Google Books or other digitisation projects, there are certain commonalities between the two which are worth considering when attempting to conceptualise this more recent proposal.'”

Tags:

If you read this blog regularly, you know I’m pretty obsessed with utopias, those elusive things, perhaps because they’re beautiful and doomed. It takes so much energy, so much hubris, to act on those visions, yet people throughout history have and continue to. Maybe a place can be perfect, but people, alas, don’t have that option. The centre cannot hold.

The opening of “The Man Who Tried to Change the Soul of Paris,” Jacqueline Feldman’s Atlantic piece about French architect Michel Holley, who began attempting decades ago to impose his will onto Paris, his dreams ultimately realized and yet not realized at all:

‘At my age, unfortunately, one has no more dreams,’ says Michel Holley, the 87-year-old architect who once built Paris toward the sky. ‘One has turned toward the past.’

Forty years ago, Holley’s residential towers called Olympiades were the pièce de resistance of the city’s biggest renovation in over a century. Holley drew inspiration from Le Corbusier, who famously envisioned Paris as gridded, severe high-rises. Today, the towers sway between vitality and decay. Holley, who also worked on Montparnasse Tower and the Front de Seine, led controversial, sweeping projects to accommodate immigrants, baby boomers, and cars in 1960s Paris. ‘I dreamed a lot, in those days,’ he says. ‘Because these were inventions and creations in advance of their time, and I dreamed a lot, and I realized my dreams, realized my utopias.’

But Holley’s dream has faced criticism since construction. The ‘vertical zoning’ means parts of Olympiades are deserted at certain times. The mall closes at 9 p.m., and as restaurateurs lower metal over their storefronts, men gather in corners, emitting catcalls. Outside, wind whips between the towers. Evenings, the slab empties except for some men and dogs lingering at its edge, near the overgrown planters and vents that billow the smell of Chinese food.

‘I’m sure that there is a set of quite good restaurants on the slab, but you need to be quite courageous to get there after 8,’ says Didier Bernateau, director of development at SCET, the urban engineering firm that leads the network of public and private companies that develop land in France. ‘There’s a feeling of unsafeness, and the stairs, and the coolness of the wind.’

‘It is the worst failure in the history of Paris’ urban projects,’ says Ahmad Kaddour, an artist who teaches silk-screening classes at an Olympiades workshop. ‘Olympiades is the death of God.’

‘Today it exists, so we must make do,’ says Jérôme Coumet, mayor of the 13th.”

_____________________

More posts about utopias:

Tags: ,

Malcolm Gladwell lecturing at the University of Pennsylvania about how much proof we need before we decide something is dangerous. He draws analogies between the historical incidence of black-lung disease and contemporary threats.

Tags:

Because of immigration, that great and currently misunderstood thing, America should never become a graying population like homogeneous countries (e.g., Japan) nor a society dominated by religious conservatives who reproduce the most. So, I suppose I’m not too worried about a Newsweek report by Joel Kotkin and Harry Siegel whick looks at life in the U.S. in the first era when childlessness is not a stigma. An excerpt:

“The global causes of postfamilialism are diverse, and many, on their own, are socially favorable or at least benign. The rush of people worldwide into cities, for example, has ushered in prosperity for hundreds of millions, allowing families to be both smaller and more prosperous. Improvements in contraception and increased access to it have given women far greater control of their reproductive options, which has coincided with a decline in religion in most advanced countries. With women’s rights largely secured in the First World and their seats in the classroom, the statehouse, and the boardroom no longer tokens or novelties, children have ceased being an economic or cultural necessity for many or an eventual outcome of sex.

But those changes happened quickly enough—within a lifetime—that they’ve created rapidly graying national populations in developed, and even some developing, countries worldwide, as boomers hold on to life and on to the pension and health benefits promised by the state while relatively few new children arrive to balance their numbers and to pay for those promises.

Until recently that decrepitude has seemed oceans away, as America’s open spaces, sprawling suburbs, openness to immigrants, and relatively religious culture helped keep our population young and growing. But attitudes are changing here as well. A plurality of Americans—46 percent—told Pew in 2009 that the rising number of women without children “makes no difference one way or the other” for our society.

Tags: ,

The 3Doodler, the word’s firs 3D printing pen, has already been funded on Kickstarter. From its copy on that site: “It’s a pen that can draw in the air! 3Doodler is the 3D printing pen you can hold in your hand. Lift your imagination off the page! Have you ever just wished you could lift your pen off the paper and see your drawing become a real three dimensional object? Well now you can! 3Doodler is the world’s first and only 3D Printing Pen. Using ABS plastic (the material used by many 3D printers), 3Doodler draws in the air or on surfaces. It’s compact and easy to use, and requires no software or computers. You just plug it into a power socket and can start drawing anything within minutes”

"I purchased them from a gypsy cart in Niagara Falls on June 6 1996 they have brought me nothing but Strange dreams."

“Ever since I purchased them from a gypsy cart in Niagara Falls on June 6, 1996 they have brought me nothing but Strange dreams.”

Haunted Item – Pennies acquired June 6 1996 06/06/06 – $10

Please get these darn pennies out of my house. I hate them. Ever since I purchased them from a gypsy cart in Niagara Falls on June 6, 1996 they have brought me nothing but Strange dreams. They are not bad dreams , however I am weak of heart and cannot tolerate them. I try to get rid of them but they always return to me. I wish to ship them as far away from me as possible. Hence the free worldwide shipping. I am selling them individually as I was told they will always return to the original owner if brought together. Because of this I do apologize that I can only sell one per person. If you are buying for yourself and a friend (because you are either playing a joke or just plain evil) Then please send me both shipping addresses and I will ship them separately.

I must add that I was told by the gypsy that these particular pennies brought fortune to those who had the same birth year as the Penny. I was not fortunate enough to get a penny with my birth year so if you would like one with your birth year please message me and I will see if I have one. No extra charge of course. Thank you all and to those interested please make sure you are tolerate of strange dreams before purchase. I am not accepting returns on these, unless of course they really bother you.

At the Chronicle of Higher Education, Marlene Zuk’s article “Misguided Nostalgia for Our Paleo Past” pushes back at the idea that modern life is out of sync with human evolution, something I myself often suspect. An excerpt:

To think of ourselves as misfits in our own time and of our own making flatly contradicts what we now understand about the way evolution works—namely, that rate matters. That evolution can be fast, slow, or in-between, and understanding what makes the difference is far more enlightening, and exciting, than holding our flabby modern selves up against a vision—accurate or not—of our well-muscled and harmoniously adapted ancestors.

The paleofantasy is a fantasy in part because it supposes that we humans, or at least our protohuman forebears, were at some point perfectly adapted to our environments. We apply this erroneous idea of evolution’s producing the ideal mesh between organism and surroundings to other life forms, too, not just to people. We seem to have a vague idea that long long ago, when organisms were emerging from the primordial slime, they were rough-hewn approximations of their eventual shape, like toys hastily carved from wood, or an artist’s first rendition of a portrait, with holes where the eyes and mouth eventually will be.

Then, the thinking goes, the animals were subject to the forces of nature. Those in the desert got better at resisting the sun, while those in the cold evolved fur or blubber or the ability to use fire. Once those traits had appeared and spread in the population, we had not a kind of sketch, but a fully realized organism, a fait accompli, with all of the lovely details executed, the anatomical t’s crossed and i’s dotted.

But of course that isn’t true.”

Tags:

I’m not much of a conspiracy theorist. For the most part, a lone gunman is just that. But that doesn’t stop the fabulists. In the below video, James Earl Ray tells his story to Bill Boggs.

Tags: ,

I think I reviewed the original Freakonomics and enjoyed it a whole lot. Breaking down myths is something we need to be actively doing. I wonder though if Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner haven’t provided alternative answers to life’s questions that are likewise too tidy–that are also a bit of a narrative. Levitt just did an Ask Me Anything on Reddit. A few exchanges follow which reveal the economist’s feelings on gun control and other issues.

__________________________

Question:

My statistics class just recently finished reading your book, so thanks for doing an AMA! One of the things we were discussing about was if government’s current view on guns is a misconception on their part. Do you think the promotion of gun safety awareness or removing guns from stores will cause a drop in gun violence in the near future?

Answer:

My view, which basically has to be true, is that NOTHING that the government does to the flow of new guns can possibly affect gun violence much. There are already 300 million guns out there! They will be around for the next 50 years. The cat is out of the bag.

Question:

Success in Australia in the 90’s when they banned assault weapons depended upon the buy-back of the newly banned guns. It was vital.

Answer:

There is no sillier public policy than gun buybacks. You hardly get any guns, and the ones you get are not the ones that would be used in a crime.

Question:

After listening to your show on gun control. I was wondering if you guys are gun owners?

Answer:

Neither of us own guns.

I like guns. I would have one, probably, if my wife would let me. But she won’t.

__________________________

Question:

If you were King of the United States for a day, what changes would you put into place? What laws/policy changes are incredibly obvious to economists but contrary to public/political popular opinion?

Answer:

1) People have to pay a big chunk of their own health care.

2) We should have a flat tax or something like it.

3) We should allow/encourage talented immigrants to come to the US.

I think every economist believes in those three things.

__________________________

Question:

Who’d win in a fist fight, you, or Malcom Gladwell?

Answer:

That is a great question. I think I could actually take him.

I think Dubner and I together, would massacre him.

No mercy.

Tags:

From the July 10, 1900 Brooklyn Daily Eagle:

Little Rock, Ark.–An entire family of nine persons died to-day near Calico Rock, Marion County, from eating poisonous toadstools, mistaking them for mushrooms. The victims are W.J. Fink, aged 40; Mrs. Mary Lee Fink, 30; John E. Fink, 18; Keakie Fink, 13; Sigel Fink, 11; Vell Fink, 9; Rose Lee Fink, 7; Melan Fink, 6; infant child.

The family ate a hearty dinner, which included the supposed mushrooms. All were taken violently ill and none recovered.”

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

A former Nazi training camp outside Berlin is now a free-love eco-village. From Katherine Rowland’s Guernica report on the ongoing social experiment:

Anna and her partner Thomas are members of this community, based not far outside of Berlin, where I and some 300 other people have decided to vacation. I met Thomas moments after I had hauled my bag up the steep and curving driveway: a tall, pony-tailed figure, beating the dust of baking flour from his hands so that he could light a cigarette. Thomas had apparently informed his girlfriend of his intention to seduce me. Over breakfast, Anna looks at me, I think with resignation, and I realize I’ve entered a very fragile space.

This unassuming place carved out of the forest was, once a Stasi training camp, one where spies learned how to lay the ‘honey trap,’ and wrest secrets through sex. Today it is the Centre for Experimental Culture Design (Zentrum für Experimentelle Gesellschaftsgestaltung), or ZEGG for short—a radical community devoted to ‘consciousness in love.’

ZEGG began as an experiment in 1978, when the social sciences were more closely aligned with revolutionary acts. A German sociologist, Dieter Duhm, believed his discipline could resolve questions concerning no less than the essence of the human condition, and in the name of research, he set out on a tour of alternative communities in search of social harmony. His travels eventually took him to the settlement of the Austrian artist, Otto Muehl, where residents were engaged in wild experiments in sexuality, based on the notion that large-scale social change was contingent on liberating sex from the trappings of power. Viewing the family as the handmaiden to bourgeois culture, Muehl’s commune, at its height home to about 700 people, espoused free love, collective resources and the destruction of private property. Though the experiment was dismantled in 1990, owing to growing conflicts between the members and Muehl’s arrest on charges of ‘criminal acts against morality,’ Duhm saw in the project the seeds of promise. He shared the artist’s view that monogamy was repressive, and drew from it his enduring principle that there can be no peace on earth until there is first and foremost harmony among the sexes. And the central impediment to harmony? The inalienable desire to have sex with people other than your partner.”

________________________

“People are by the pool, laying out, nude, and enjoying the sun”:

Tags: , ,

Lorne Michaels and the original Saturday Night Live cast (the show was initially called Saturday Night because Howard Cosell was using the SNL name at ABC) interviewed by Tom Snyder in 1975 just before the program debuted.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

From John Horgan’s Scientific American blog post “Why Drones Should Make You Afraid. Very Afraid.“:

“According to a report in today’s New York Times, the Department of Homeland Security has also offered grants to help police departments purchase drones, which are ‘becoming a darling of law-enforcement authorities across the country.’

  • The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency is funding research on ‘micro-drones’ that resemble moths, hummingbirds and other small flying creatures and hence can ‘hide in plain sight,’ as one Air Force researcher told me. The Air Force is now testing micro-drones at facilities such as the ‘micro-aviary’ at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Dayton, Ohio.
  • These micro-drones could be armed. The Air Force has produced an extraordinarily creepy animated video extolling possible applications of ‘Micro Air Vehicles,’ which a narrator extols as ‘unobtrusive, pervasive, lethal.’  The video shows winged drones swarming out of the belly of a plane and descending on a city, where the drones stalk and kill a suspect.

Tags:

I went to Catholic school as a child and was instantly turned off by the hypocrisy and patriarchal hierarchy and anti-science attitude and the scare tactics, but I probably gained something from the inculcation of ethics–the Golden Rule and such. But ethics and myths can be divorced, can’t they? The opening of “Godless Yet Good,” a new Aeon essay by Troy Jollimore about morality, religion and secularism:

“A couple of years ago, the idea of God came up, in an incidental way, in the Contemporary Moral Theory course I teach. I generally try not to reveal my particular beliefs and commitments too early in the semester, but since it was late in the course, I felt I could be open with the students about my lack of religious belief. I will never forget the horrified look on one student’s face. ‘But Professor Jollimore,’ he stammered, ‘how can you not believe in God? You teach ethics for a living!’

I shouldn’t have been surprised by this reaction. But I always am. We were 12 weeks into a class that discussed a great variety of recent moral theories, none of which made the slightest reference to any sort of divine power or authority, but this made no difference. After 20 years of living in the US (I was born in Canada), I still tend to forget how many people here assume, simply as a matter of common sense, that the very idea of ‘secular ethics’ is an abomination, a contradiction, or both.

I don’t want to suggest that this attitude is influential only in the US. It is simply more prominent here. In polls and studies, a majority of Americans don’t trust atheists and say they would not vote for a presidential candidate who did not believe in God. ‘Religion’ and ‘theology’ are still frequently cited in the American media as if they were the sole aspects of human existence responsible for matters of value. ‘We need science to tell us the way things are; we need religion to tell us the way things ought to be,’ as people around here like to say. I have spent my career studying the way things ‘ought to be,’ outside of the scaffolding of any faith or religious tradition. No wonder I find such sentiments rather frustrating.

More than that, I find them perplexing.”

Tags:

mmmm

Donald Trump: Tic Tac Dough still thinks he’s a scumbag.

It’s usually the last person who should be pointing fingers who points them first. Like when Donald Trump scolds other people for adultery or accuses someone else’s restaurant of having bad food. Recently, Donald Trump has been trying to get revenge on Brian Williams because the NBC anchor chided him for his disgraceful Twitter antics on Election Day. He’s been insulting the newsman because of his low-rated primetime show, Rock Center.

________________________

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump

Looks like @bwilliams is having some problems with his Rock Center with Brian Williams show–I hate to see such bad ratings for @NBC.

________________________

Of course, Brian Williams has consistently had the number one network evening newscast, drawing nearly 10 million viewers a night to a non-primetime show. If only Donald Trump’s show was drawing such numbers for NBC in primetime:

“On NBC, the finale of Celebrity Apprentice was up four-tenths, drawing a 2.2 compared to last week’s 1.8 among adults 18-49. However, this was the lowest-rated finale episode of the series to date.” (TVbythenumbers.com.)

________________________

But there’s some good news for Donald Trump: A major news organization recently conducted a scientific survey and discovered that Donald Trump is the third most envied person in America.

________________________

Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump
Wow—Family Feud said I am the third most envied man in America. I respectfully disagree—I am very modest.
Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump
If I’m the third most envied man in America, the small group of haters and losers must be nauseas.

Donald J. Trump
 ‏@realDonaldTrump
Great going.
________________________

I myself am feeling a little “nauseas” right now. However, Donald Trump shouldn’t get too excited–the same 100 people who were too dumb to get out of answering that Family Feud survey also gave these responses when asked the following question: “When someone mentions ‘the King,’ to whom might he or she be referring?”

________________________

But Donald Trump is being too modest. He was mentioned on the Family Feud another time. It’s time to play the Feud.

Butt Brownies is the top answer!

The category is “Things You Would Ingest to Avoid Seeing Donald Trump Naked.” And your answer is “Butt Brownies.” The survey says…

ff11

Butt Brownies is the top answer!

Butt Brownies is the top answer!

Can I get real with you for a minute, woman?

I wish you would.

I wish you would.

I mean, can I get very real?

I've already stated my preference that you become more real.

I’ve already stated my preference that you become more real.

What if there was no other option? What if it became an existential nightmare and there was no way for you to avoid looking at Donald Trump naked? What would you do?

Blechh!

Blechh!

If I wasn't already dead, I'd shoot myself.

If I wasn’t already dead, I’d shoot myself.

_______________________

More recent fake, comedy crap:

Tags: ,

“He gravely announced himself as the ‘Spirit of Truth,’ being the Matthias mentioned in the Scriptures who had risen from the dead.”

I’ve just starting reading Gilbert Seldes’ The Stammering Century, another great title from the New York Review of Books imprint. First published in 1928, it’s the true story of the stranger-than-fiction twists and turns that religion took in 19th-century America, as it splintered into cults and manias, driven by charismatic mountebanks who passed themselves off as messiahs. (In that sense, it’s much like our age.) A section I’ve yet to reach focuses on New York-based Robert Matthews (a.k.a. Robert Matthias, Jesus Matthias, etc. ), a struggling carpenter who in the 1830s managed to convince a band of wealthy Baptist apostates to make him the head of their crazy, cult-like sect, “The Kingdom.” From “The Impostor Matthias” in the December 25, 1892 New York Times:

“The delusions of the period, thus far harmless, had assumed a progressive character that was destined to develop rapidly to a tragical conclusion. Among the leading spirits of the ‘Holy Club’ was a Mrs. Sarah Pierson, whose husband, Elijah Pierson, was a successful and highly respected merchant. She was a woman of wide culture and engaging manners, and the couple were among the most esteemed members of the Baptist society of that day. They resided on Bowery Hill, an agreeable suburb of New York, sixty years ago, somewhere in the vicinity of the present Madison Square. In this rural locality were situated, on a breezy, shaded eminence, a number of handsome houses, the summer residences of the well-to-do merchants of that period. 

In the year 1828 Mr. Pierson came to regard himself as being in constant direct communication with the Almighty, through the agency of the Holy Spirit, and his wife being equally impressed with his divine associations, the operations of the Christian world were too slow for their heated imaginations, and in 1829 they withdrew from their affiliation with the Baptist Church and organized an independent religious society, with a nucleus of twelve members, which they called ‘The Kingdom.’ Meetings were held daily and often twice a day in the Pierson residence on Bowery Hill, brief intervals only being allowed for sleep and light refreshment. The labors and vigils of the new faith, together with the protracted seasons of entire fasting, broke down the health of Mrs. Pierson, and in June, 1830, her husband having, while riding one day down Wall Street in an omnibus, received the Divine command in these words: ‘Thou art Elijah, the Tishbite. Gather unto me all the members of Israel at the foot of Mount Carmel,’ anointed her with oil from head to feet in the presence of the assembled elders of ‘the Kingdom.’ A few days later the unfortunate woman died.

“The delusion that his beloved wife was still to be raised from the dead possessed the unhappy husband’s mind for many months afterward.”

On the day of the funeral, about 200 persons being in attendance, Mr. Pierson endeavored to effect the miracle of her resurrection, attributing his failure to the lack of faith of the bystanders. The scene was harrowing in the extreme, and the delusion that his beloved wife was still to be raised from the dead possessed the unhappy husband’s mind for many months afterward. In 1831 Mr. Pierson removed to a spacious house in Third Street, where he held forth daily to the elect of ‘The Kingdom,’ which now numbered quite a large congregation of converts, some, indeed, being attracted from points outside the city. Among the latter were a Mr. Benjamin Folger and his wife, persons of wealth and standing, who had recently removed their residence from New-York to a handsome country place, near Sing Sing, or Mount Pleasant, as the place was then designated. Another conspicuous member of the strange association was a Mr. Sylvester H. Mills, a well-to-do Pearl Street merchant–a man whose naturally gloomy temperament had been intensified by the death of a beloved wife, a few months previous to the decease of Mrs. Pierson. These people, with many others of all social grades, gathered about Mr. Pierson, to listen to his denunciations of the churches, and his exhortations to place their faith in the Lord in order that, like the Apostles, they might be enabled to ‘heal the sick, cast out the devils, and raise the dead.’

While those extravagances were in progress and the inflamed imaginations of the fanatical leaders were worked up to a high pitch of expectancy, there appeared among them on May 5, 1832, a stranger, whose pretensions, while according with the tenor of their diseased minds, were so far in advance of their own most enthusiastic flights that he was at once accepted as their leader, and worshipped as a divine being. He gravely announced himself as the ‘Spirit of Truth,’ being the Matthias mentioned in the Scriptures who had risen from the dead and possessed the spirit of Jesus Christ. He further declared that he was God the Father, and claimed power to do all things, to forgive sins, and to communicate the Holy Ghost to such as believed in him.

A short account of the previous history of this singular character is necessary at this point, in order to explain how he came to fasten himself thus on ‘The Kingdom,’ with his monstrous claims of divine powers. His name was Robert Matthews, and he was born in Washington County, New York, about the year 1790. He followed the trade of carpentering, and in 1827 he lived in Albany, where he was known as a zealous member of the Dutch Reformed congregation, over which Dr. Ludlow presided. Happening to attend a service conducted by a young clergyman named Kirk, who was visiting Albany from New-York City, he returned home in a state of great excitement, and sat up all that night discussing the sermon he had heard. His enthusiasm was so great that his wife remarked during the night to her daughter: ‘If your father goes to hear that man preach any more he will become crazy.’ He did go to hear him a number of times, and the reader may gather from the sequel of this story whether the wife’s prediction was fulfilled.”

Tags: , , , ,

mm

MONKEY FOR SALE – $25 (Staten Island)

I’m moving so I need to get rid of this beast, but its so cute. His name is Peety. He opens beer bottles and can roll blunts. Very helpful around the house. Please call.

Tags:

In honor of Presidents’ Day, a Lincoln-centric Ad Council PSA that frightened children into staying in school back when education meant one thing in America. It’s hard to say what being educated means now, even more difficult to know what it will mean in the future.

Tags:

From “Levitated Mass Hysteria,” Victoria Dailey’s new Los Angeles Review of Books essay about unusual things which hold the public in thrall, particularly Michael Heizer’s “Levitated Mass” at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art:

 “Southern California, long used to fads, bubbles and exaggerations, was recently in the grip of an event that Mackay would certainly have added to his anthology of popular frenzies. Not only did it harken back to the past when the transportation of granite obelisks created awe, and when colossal rocks exerted powerful forces upon humankind, it also incorporated the modern mania for fame and celebrity, demonstrating the incurable tendency to prefer myth over fact. This event centered around a rock — a 340-ton, 21-foot high, 150 million-year-old boulder that traveled across four Southern California counties in order to be installed at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art.

What inspired the popular interest in this megalith was a project devised by Michael Heizer, an artist known for land art, and Michael Govan, the director of LACMA. In 1969 Heizer, who was in the midst of creating several massive earthwork projects in the Nevada desert, envisioned finding an ideal boulder, then installing it within an art framework. The project was delayed for over four decades, because it seems the right boulder could not be found until the artist discovered one in a rock quarry in Riverside, California in 2006. It had been blasted from a mountainside, and was too big for the quarry’s purposes, so someone contacted Heizer about it. As Govan, a friend and supporter of the artist, stated: ‘Mike was calling from the Ontario [California] airport and said: ‘I found this amazing rock.’ […] He referred to it as the Colossi of Memnon and compared it to the great pink granite Egyptian obelisks for the quality of the stone. He said it was one of the greatest rocks he’d ever seen.'”

 

______________________

The boulder arrives, March 10, 2012:

Teaser for Doug Pray’s film about the megalith:

Tags: , , ,

Having grown up in a low-income, blue-collar background, I often think of the advantages I could have enjoyed during my childhood if the Web existed pre-1990s. I was information-starved and was turned off by the dreary, laborious nature of public libraries. It was all sooo slow. But I won’t fret too much. Thanks to the Internet, I’m getting to read anything I can dream of, and treasures I never even knew were buried. What an equalizer.

From “Net Wisdom,” a new Financial Times piece by Robert Cottrell, the editor of the great Browser blog:

“My first contention: this is a great time to be a reader. The amount of good writing freely available online far exceeds what even the most dedicated consumer might have hoped to encounter a generation ago within the limits of printed media.

I don’t pretend that everything online is great writing. Let me go further: only 1 per cent is of value to the intelligent general reader, by which I mean the demographic that, in the mainstream media world, might look to the Economist, the Financial Times, Foreign Affairs or the Atlantic for information. Another 4 per cent of the internet counts as entertaining rubbish. The remaining 95 per cent has no redeeming features. But even the 1 per cent of writing by and for the elite is an embarrassment of riches, a horn of plenty, a garden of delights.”

 

Tags:

« Older entries § Newer entries »