Science/Tech

You are currently browsing the archive for the Science/Tech category.

"Boom!"

I didn’t realize until five minutes ago that some people are sexually aroused by trees. (If anyone has a time machine that will return me 301 seconds into the past, please let me know.) Apparently it’s a real thing called dendrophilia. An excerpt from an Ask Me Anything on Reddit by someone who claims to be a tree hugger (and far, far worse):

“[–]FABULOUS_fo_sho 17 points  ago

Do you have sex with women/men?

[–]TreesMakeMeHappy123[S] 21 points  ago

I have a girlfriend and I have sex with her. But she doesn’t like trees, so it’s just normal sex most of the time, which I’m okay with. But I really like nature themed sexual adventures.

[–]Lilcheeks 59 points  ago

Sounds like you need to get her a little drunk… can you say “TREE-WAY”?

[–]chickendodo 24 points  ago

How has being a dendrophiliac affected your life? Have you ever tried to/succeeded in having intercourse with said trees? Splinters?

[–]TreesMakeMeHappy123[S] 49 points  ago

It hasn’t affected me in any serious ways. I just spend a little extra time in my garden than most other people. I like to sand down one side of a tree to make it smoother and then I oil up that side and my penis and I hump it. I also wrap leaves around my penis and masturbate by stroking it like that. Haha no, I don’t get splinters. The sanding down/oiling up process is intended to prevent that.

[–]Ghostshirts 45 points  ago

i had a feeling it wasn’t a tree disease leaving those markings on my beautiful maple. i need a fence.

[–]whisperedzen 50 points  ago

A wooden fence?? beware of all the necrophiliac dendrophiliacs out there…. 

[–]armedrocker 5 points  ago

Boom!”

Months before America sent its first astronaut into space in 1961 and kicked the race to the moon into another gear, a chimpanzee named Ham departed Earth on a Mercury mission. Trained beginning in 1959 with behaviorist methods, Ham was not only a passenger but also performed small tasks during his suborbital flight. In the classic NASA photo above, Ham shakes hands with his rescuer aboard the U.S.S. Donner, after his 16-minute mission was successfully completed and he plunged back to his home. The famous chimp lived until 1983 and is buried at the International Space Hall of Fame in New Mexico. From a wonderfully terse account of Ham at Find A Grave:

“The first chimpanzee in space. Born in present-day Cameroon, captured by animal trappers and sent to Miami, FL. Ham’s name is an acronym for the lab that prepared him for his historic mission — the Holloman Aerospace Medical Center, located at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico. Purchased by the United States Air Force and brought to Holloman Air Force Base in 1959, he was selected from among a group of six chimpanzees (four female and two male). They trained to perform a series of simple tasks while in space to ascertain whether a human might be able to do the same tasks under space flight conditions. On January 31, 1961, Ham blasted off from Cape Canavaral becoming the world’s first AstroChimp. He proved that it was possible for a human to venture into space by taking a 16½ minute, 2000 mph ride atop an 83-foot Mercury Redstone rocket known as the MR2. Three months later the first American human, Alan Shepard, followed him into space.”

••••••••••

“The chimp has been carefully selected, thoroughly examined and patiently tutored”:

The opening of Don Lancaster’s 1973 Radio & Electronics article about his creation, the TV Typewriter, an early way to transform your television into a computer terminal and open possibilties for connectivity:

“This construction project started out as a, very low cost computer terminal for home use, but as it went together, we became aware of the many possible non-computer uses for such a device, particularly since it is priced right. What can you do with a machine that puts letters and numbers on an ordinary unmodified TV set?

Obviously, it’s a computer terminal for timesharing services, schools, and experimental uses. It’s a ham radio Teletype terminal. Coupled to the right services, it can also display news, stock quotations, time, and weather. It’s a communications aide for the deaf. It’s a teaching machine, particularly good for helping preschoolers learn the alphabet and words. It also keeps them busy for hours as an educational toy.

It’s a super sales promoter, either locally or on a store wide basis. It’s easily converted to a title machine for a video recorder. It’s a message generator or ‘answer back’ unit for advanced two way cable TV systems. Tied to a cassette recorder, it’s an electronic notebook and study aid, or a custom catalog. It’s an annunciator for plant, schools, and hospitals that tells not only that someone is needed, but why and where.

And, if all that isn’t enough, it’s easy to convert into a 12 or 16 place electronic calculator. You can also make a clock out of it, and, with extensive modification, you can even make a 32 register, 16 place serial digital computer out of the beast!

Cost of the project? Around $120 for the basic unit. This is slightly under two month’s normal rental of commercial units that don’t do nearly as much, and less than 1/10 the cost of anything commercial you could buy to do the same job. And we feel that this cost is finally low enough that a lot of new uses are now not only possible, but reasonable as well.”

Tags:

"It is, nonetheless, a sublime scene to consider." (Image by Glenn J. Mason.)

From a post on that wonderful BLDGBLOG, a post about the glass-covered surfaces of Mars:

“More than 10 million square kilometers of landscape on the surface of Mars, a region nearly the size of Europe, is made of glass—specifically volcanic glass, ‘a shiny substance similar to obsidian that forms when magma cools too fast for its minerals to crystallize.’

In a paper called ‘Widespread Weathered Glass On the Surface of Mars,’ authors Briony Horgan and James F. Bell III, from the School of Earth and Space Exploration at Arizona State University, go on to suggest that ‘the ubiquitous dusty mantle covering much of the northern plains [of Mars] may obscure more extensive glass deposits’ yet to mapped.

Although it’s worth emphasizing that this glass is present mostly in the form of ‘Eolian’ grains—that is, small pieces of windblown sand accumulating in dune fields—it is, nonetheless, a sublime scene to consider.”

Tags: ,

Crowdsourcing is now at the service of scientific inquiry into intelligence and memory, as reported in an article by Benedict Carey in the New York Times. The opening:

“In the largest collaborative study of the brain to date, scientists using imaging technology at more than 100 centers worldwide have for the first time zeroed in on genes that they agree play a role in intelligence and memory.

Scientists working to understand the biology of brain function — and especially those using brain imaging, a blunt tool — have been badly stalled. But the new work, involving more than 200 scientists, lays out a strategy for breaking the logjam. The findings appear in a series of papers published online Sunday in the journal Nature Genetics.

‘What’s really new here is this movement toward crowd-sourcing brain research,’ said Paul Thompson, a professor of neurology at the University of California, Los Angeles, and senior author of one of the papers. ‘This is an example of social networking in science, and it gives us a power we have not had.'”

••••••••••

An earlier, less-clinical group memory study:

Tags:

Christian Marclay cuts and combines records, plays them off center, etc.

Tags:

Because robotics has lacked, above all, a Marxist perspective, here’s the opening of a manifesto by Communist Robot which believes that tin machines can free the masses:

“If not within our lifetime, than within the lifetime of our children there will be a revolution in robotics that will change every aspect of human society as we know it. Will we be ready for it? We are just now settling into the information age; enjoying the luxuries of the industrial revolution while sharing prosperity around the world, but in this age not everyone lives a life of luxury. Everyone can’t, because if everyone did who would clean the toilets? Who would do the farming? Who would make our Nike shoes? The prosperity of the modern world is dependent on the unfortunate unskilled workers living in poverty locally and throughout the world.

The rich of the world don’t physically labor; their work is to manage the resources they’ve attained that make them wealthy. Those resources, textiles or commodities are intrinsically dependent on the people paid to manufacture and distribute them. It is in the interest of the business owner to pay those people as little as possible to insure maximum returns and increase wealth. Obviously. Less obviously is the bare bones necessity of maintaining the monetary divide between wealth controlling business owners and the laboring masses. A business owner’s personal incentive for furthering financial growth is only a catalyst that preserves a more fundamentally important economic truth: The rich need the poor.

If you work out of necessity to support yourself you are poor. The middle class is just the fancy poor living in prosperous countries where even the poor are often richer than the richest of poor nations. The rich are dependent on the poor for their productive value, they need workers and the rich don’t labor so they need the poor to work for them. The poor spend their money buying the commodities the rich control, which means anything they were paid is just going back to their employer. Ultimately it’s not about the money; it’s about getting people to work for you.”

Print encyclopedias had grand ambitions–collecting and standardizing all human knowledge, encouraging rationalism, etc.–but there was a huge downside. As good as their intentions may have been, those editing the volumes were guided by their own prejudices and that narrowness was reflected in the books. Our current free-for-all of information assemblage is an improvement. It was a lie to begin with to believe that we could somehow neatly place all knowledge in a few orderly volumes. Instead this delusion has passed away and been replaced by far greater depth and navigability, thanks to our online culture. But inWhat We’ve Lost With The Demise Of Print Encyclopediasin the New Republic, David A. Bell sees a dark cloud: the expungment of a coherent throughline of knowledge. An excerpt:

“Yet with the disappearance of paper encyclopedias, a part of the Western intellectual tradition is disappearing as well. I am not speaking of the idea of impartial, objective, and meticulously accurate reference. There is no reason this cannot be duplicated in digital media. Even Wikipedia, despite its amateur, volunteer authors, has emerged as an increasingly important and accurate reference tool, reaping respectful commentary last month from no less an authority than William Cronon, president of the American Historical Association. And I am not speaking of the pleasures that come from the serendipitous browsing of handsome encyclopedia volumes, in which the idle flip of a finger takes one from Macaroni to Douglas MacArthur, and thence to Macao, Macbeth, and the Maccabees. The internet provides its own opportunities for serendipitous discovery.

But the great paper encyclopedias of the past had other, grander ambitions: They aspired to provide an overview of all human knowledge, and, still more boldly, to put that knowledge into a coherent, logical order. Even if they mostly organized their articles alphabetically, they also sought ways to link the material together thematically—all of it. In 1974, for instance, the editors of the Encyclopedia Britannica added to the work a one-volume ‘Propaedia,’ which sought to provide a detailed outline of human knowledge, while referencing the appropriate articles of the encyclopedia itself. Large headings such as ‘Life,’ ‘Society,’ and ‘Religion’ were subdivided into forty-odd ‘divisions’ and then further into hundreds of individual ‘sections.'” (Thanks Browser.)

••••••••••

Jiminy Cricket, who caused considerable damage to the crops due to his herbivorous feeding habits, encourages your children to be less gormless:

Tags: ,

B.F. Skinner, who could not stop messing with pigeons, makes a boid do a 360.

Tags:

People will go to almost any length today for status, sacrificing whatever it takes for a brush with fame, for the chance to appear special. But that’s nothing new, not a product of media saturation or any other sort of modern condition. Desperation didn’t start with us. Earlier today, I came across this 2009 New York Times article about palace attendants in the ancient city of Ur, who angled for jobs that would provide them with a fleeting sense of importance before resulting in their brutal deaths. An excerpt:

“A new examination of skulls from the royal cemetery at Ur, discovered in Iraq almost a century ago, appears to support a more grisly interpretation than before of human sacrifices associated with elite burials in ancient Mesopotamia, archaeologists say.

Palace attendants, as part of royal mortuary ritual, were not dosed with poison to meet a rather serene death. Instead, a sharp instrument, a pike perhaps, was driven into their heads…There were two round holes in the soldier’s cranium and one in the woman’s, each about an inch in diameter. But the most convincing evidence, Dr. Monge said in an interview, were cracks radiating from the holes. Only if the holes were made in a living person would they have produced such a pattern of fractures along stress lines. The more brittle bones of a person long dead would shatter like glass, she explained.

Dr. Monge surmised that the holes were made by a sharp instrument and that death ‘by blunt-force trauma was almost immediate.’

Ritual killing associated with a royal death was practiced by other ancient cultures, archaeologists say, and raises a question: Why would anyone, knowing their probable fate, choose a life as a court attendant?

‘It’s almost like mass murder and hard for us to understand,’ Dr. Monge said. ‘But in the culture these were positions of great honor, and you lived well in the court, so it was a trade-off. Besides, the movement into the next world was not for them necessarily something to fear.'”

Young Adult
The new technologies haven’t just connected us to one another but also to the past. We’ve always been emotionally attached to what was, of course, but now we are practically as well. Every day is a high school reunion, a scrapbook stuffed with memories that look inviting from a distance. It’s comforting, sure, but is that how things should be? Is a revolving door between now and then our healthiest option? Should the past be something in our appointment schedules or largely in our minds?

The second Jason Reitman-Diablo Cody collaboration centers on a former teen queen who’s now a soused writer of young-adult fiction (Charlize Theron). The YA series is in decline, as is the author, who returns to her stifling Minnesota hometown seeking consolation from a former high-school flame who is now married with children. “He knew me when I was at my best,” she says, confusing a time of lesser self-knowledge for one of greater happiness. Things soon get messy. Even if you have Google Maps on that shiny screen in your pocket, you still can’t go home again. Watch trailer.

••••••••••

Shut Up, Little Man!: An Audio Misadventure
In Matthew Bate’s telling documentary, two Midwest punks, Mitchell Deprey and Eddie Lee Sausage, moved to a dumpy San Fran apartment building during the 1980s, unaware that their new neighbors were a loud, drunk, violent Odd Couple–an embittered redneck homophobe, Raymond Huffman, and his gay, surly roommate, Peter Haskett. When one punk confronts Ray about the noise, the “Cro-Magnon looking man with the neck muscles of a newborn” tells him to shove it. The punks moved on to plan B: popping a cassette into a boom box and recording the insane arguments. The mixtapes were shared with friends and gradually became an underground sensation, with playwrights, comic-book artists and filmmakers appropriating the very raw material to turn it into art (and profit). It was an analog precursor to our viral digital culture.

Questions abound in regards to intellectual property law and the nature of art, but perhaps the most revealing moment occurs during one of the “recording sessions,” when the punks snake a microphone outside Ray and Peter’s window to get better sound. The frenemies notice the device. “Oh, the neighbors are recording us,” one says, taking a brief break from swears and punches. But they quickly return to their brawl, disregarding the intrusion on their privacy. A couple decades later, their lack of inhibiton has become the norm. Watch trailer.

••••••••••

More recent films I liked now on home video:

Tags: , , , , , , ,

VCRs will murder your children. Pre-Internet scare-mongering.

Are we so different than pigeons, you and I? By B.F. Skinner, of course.

Tags:

Two decades before Dan Okrent invented fantasy baseball at the Rotisserie restaurant in New York in 1980, there was John Burgeson, an IBM worker in Akron who figured out computer sports leagues long before there was an infrastructure to support them. Bess Kalb tells his story in an excellent new Grantland article. An excerpt:

‘The common narrative holds that the journalist Dan Okrent invented fantasy baseball in 1980 — and cleaving to the widely accepted definition of ‘fantasy baseball,’ it’s true. In Okrent’s vision, any fan could be the owner of a team in a fantasy league. Fantasy gamers would draft active MLB players based on whatever instincts and intangibles a real GM would take into consideration and they’d follow each player’s performance throughout the season to compete against other fantasy teams in the league. The concept was infectiously straightforward. By the end of the decade, a half million people throughout the country were deep into roto. Okrent’s version became a craze, and his game, not John’s, is why the modern incarnation of all fantasy sports exists.

While Okrent is indisputably the game’s father, John is its genetically distant forebear, and for the sake of historical correctness he recently decided to claim great-grand-paternity. In January 2009, just shy of his 80th birthday, John Burgeson logged on to Wikipedia and edited the entry for fantasy baseball to include this: ‘An early form of fantasy baseball was coded for an IBM 1620 computer in 1960 by John Burgeson, IBM Akron.’ He appended some scanned documents confirming the game’s existence, and with them, he wrote himself into history. Of course, neither Burgeson nor Okrent profited from their inventions, but on that day, John earned a bit of credit for an idea lost in a filing cabinet for 50 years.

In 1960, nobody cared about a computer wonk in Akron tinkering at his desk for his own amusement, and John’s game never caught on. “

••••••••••

Atari Baseball, 1979:

Read also:

Tags: ,

You cannot escape him now. Made with loving care by Boston Dynamics.

Arizona kids who hid from the desert heat in their temperature-controlled middle-class homes, gorging on all manner of television, the Tubes eventually emerged from the conditioned air to regurgitate on stage everything they’d been fed in their formative years, not necessarily drawing lines to separate the teachings of Bob Barker, Billy Graham and Bugs Bunny, because they all had fit so snugly inside the very same box in the living room.

A good 1978 doc about the media-saturated group:

Tags:

Thom Andersen analyzing Hollywood’s puzzling penchant for equating Los Angeles’ glorious Modernist architecture with villainy.

Tags:

From Jonah Lehrer’s smart new Wired interview with fellow neuroscientist Eric Kandel, a passage about the diffuse influence of 19th-century pathologist Carl von Rokitansky;

Lehrer: One of the heroes in The Age of Insight is Carl von Rokitansky, the founder of the Second Vienna School of Medicine. You argue that he inspired, at least in part, the work of modernist artists such as Gustav Klimt, Oskar Kokoschka and Egon Schiele. How did he exert this influence?

Kandel: Rokitansky is the founder of what is now considered the second Vienna School of Medicine, which began around 1846. He was the head pathologist of the Vienna General Hospital, called the Allgemeines Krankenhaus, and then became Dean of the Medical School at the University of Vienna. Rokitansky contributed importantly – I would say, seminally – to the development of modern scientific medicine. He realized that when one examines the patient, one essentially relies on two pieces of information: the patient’s history, and an examination of the patient – listening to the heart and the chest with a stethoscope. But in the 1840s, one did not have any deep insight into what the sounds of the heart meant, for example. No one knew what we now know to be the difference between the sound of a normal valve opening and closing, and the sound of a diseased valve opening and closing. So what Rokitansky realized was that one needed to correlate what one sees of the patient at the bedside, with the examination of the patient’s body at autopsy. Fortunately, Vienna was an absolutely ideal place to do this.

The Vienna General Hospital had two rules that were unique in Europe. One is – every patient who died was autopsied, and two – all the autopsies were done by one person: Rokitansky, the head of Pathology. In other hospitals in Europe, the autopsy was done by whichever physician was is in charge of the patient. So Rokitansky had a huge amount of clinical material to work with. He collaborated with an outstanding clinician, Josef Skoda, who took very careful notes both of what the patient told him, and of what he found on physical examination, and he correlated that with Rokitansky’s autopsy. This allowed Skoda and Rokistansky to define what various heart sounds meant in normal physiology and in diseases of the valve. It also led Rokitansky to enunciate a major principle that had a huge influence – not only on medicine – but also on the cultural community at large, because Rokitansky was not simply a pathologist and Dean of the School of Medicine; he was elected to Parliament, became a spokesman of science, and had an enormous influence on popular culture. He said, ‘The truth is often hidden below the surface. One has to go deep below the skin to find it.’ This Rokitanskian principle had an enormous impact on Freud and on Schnitzler, who were students at the Vienna School of Medicine. In fact, Freud was a student in the last several years of Rokitansky’s Deanship. Rokitansky attended the first two scientific talks that Freud gave, and Freud attended Rokitansky’s funeral. He clearly had a significant impact on Freud’s thinking.” (Thanks Browser.)

Tags: , ,

I’m in favor of regulated gun ownership in America, because it’s never a good idea to create a black market that’s far worse than the open market. But Japan getting rid of its firearms is a jaw-dropping course reversal. The fable-ish opening of Neil Postman’s 1992 Technos essay, “Deus Machina“:

“Once upon a time, in a land far away, disorder and fear plagued the people. Guns and cannons were everywhere, warring parties slaughtered each other by the thousands, and no soldier would venture into battle unless equipped with the most modern firearms. The gun makers of the land were powerful, skillful, and prosperous, for they not only made guns for their own people but sold them to foreigners as well. You could hardly travel anywhere in the cities or country without seeing a gun or hearing one, which is why the children slept fitfully, with fear in their hearts.

For almost one hundred years, this was the situation in that forlorn land. Then, gradually, the people began to wonder if they would not be better off without their guns. It is hard to know why this thought arose. But they were an intelligent people with strong and ancient traditions and a well-developed sense of civilized behavior. Perhaps that is why the soldiers announced that they did not really like guns, for there was little skill and no honor in killing a man with a gun. The politicians were forced to admit that guns were not necessary to protect the land from foreign invasion since their armies were large and loyal and had never forgotten how to use swords. Besides, no one had seriously tried to invade their land for as far back as anyone could remember. Then, too, everyone agreed that guns were ugly, hardly comparable to the elegant beauty of a well-made sword. And because the sword was so beautiful, it had a value far beyond its use as a weapon. It was a symbol of honor, piety, and courage. And everyone knew that there once was a time when swords were given as gifts to men of great character.”

Tags:

Boids playing ping-pong, via B.F. Skinner.

Tags:

Calculator and computer legend Jack Tramiel just passed away. His name isn’t as well known as Jobs or Gates, but it should be recalled that his Commodore 64, which came to the market in 1982, was the Model T of home computing, introducing zeros and ones into home addresses. In this 1977 video, a host presents the Commodore PET, a gorgeous machine that was ahead of its time.

Commodore’s Mini-Slide Rule, 1973:

Tags:

“The machine cannot lie,” said Leland Stanford, but racer Jackie Stewart knew that humans certainly could–especially to themselves–as he discusses his elaborate preparations for Monaco in 1972 with his good friend, yes, Roman Polanski.

Tags: , ,

From a 1993 Technos article by that late Luddite Neil Postman, who worried over technology but knew its dominion would only increase:

“Let me begin, then, to make my case by telling you about a conversation I had with an automobile salesman who was trying to get me to buy a new Honda Accord. He pointed out that the car was equipped with cruise control, for which there was an additional charge. As is my custom in thinking about the value of technology, I asked him, ‘What is the problem to which cruise control is the answer?’ The question startled him, but he recovered enough to say, ‘It is the problem of keeping your foot on the gas.’ I told him I had been driving for 35 years and had never found that to be a problem. He then told me about the electric windows. ‘What is the problem,’ I asked, ‘to which electric windows are the answer?’ He was ready for me this time. With a confident smile, he said, ‘You don’t have to wind the windows up and down with your arm.’ I told him that this, too, had never been a problem, and that, in fact, I rather valued the exercise it gave me.

I bought the car anyway, because, as it turns out, you cannot get a Honda Accord without cruise control and electric windows—which brings up the first point I should like to mention. It is that, contrary to conventional wisdom, new technologies do not, by and large, increase people’s options but do just the opposite.”

Tags:

Speaking of space-age undergarments, an excerpt from Rosten Woo’s Los Angeles Review of Books essay, “The Right Fit,” about Nicholas de Monchaux’s history of the Apollo spacesuit, which was a more low-tech creation than you might imagine:

“The narrative heart of Spacesuit is the story of Playtex, the women’s undergarment manufacturer. The company, known at the time as the International Latex Corporation, triumphed over the more politically connected, engineering-driven Hamilton-Standard to win the Apollo lunar space-suit contract. It plays out like an after-school special: ILC’s team, a motley group of seamstresses and engineers, led by a car mechanic and a former television repairman, manages to convince NASA to let them enter their ‘test suit’ in a closed, invitation-only competitive bid at their own expense. They spend six weeks working around the clock — at times breaking into their own offices to work 24-hour shifts — to arrive at a suit solution that starkly outperforms the two invited competitors. In open, direct competition with larger, more moneyed companies, ILC manages to produce a superior space suit by drawing on the craft-culture handiwork and expertise of seamstresses, rather than on the hard-line culture of engineering.

The ILC workshop was a hybrid endeavor: Producing new forms required new skills and habits. Space suit contract in hand, ILC now had to adapt to NASA’s engineering culture. Though ILC seamstresses were hand-making each suit to order based on the astronauts’ measurements, the rigorous specifications of the space suit took the craft to an extreme unknown even to couture: ‘Tolerances allowed for sewing — less than a sixty-fourth of an inch in only one direction from the seam — meant that yard after yard was sewn to an accuracy smaller than the sewing needle’s eye.’ Modified treadles allowed the workers to punch a single stitch with each footfall. To curb the use of pins (just one of these misplaced in a suit’s lining could render an entire suit useless), numbered pin-sets had to be checked out at the beginning of each day and returned each evening as a complete set. Once each part of the suit was produced it also had to be described — made intelligible and traceable by NASA, whose bureaucracy was ill-equipped, to put it mildly, to comprehend or regulate an object like a garment. Because each suit and each component of each suit was designed for a specific astronaut, mountains of paperwork followed. Every alteration to the suit required NASA to register the garment as a new object, a complication worthy of a Borges story.

Yet the suits, de Monchaux says, were never actually constructed according to engineering drawings. The drawings were always descriptive, not prescriptive: produced after the fact. To fit into NASA’s engineering system, ILC had to essentially reverse-engineer construction documents of each space suit after they had already been produced. This seemingly small detail points to the vast blind spots across different cultures of making and knowing, and de Monchaux happily points out the appealing irony: The very image of NASA’s technical triumph, the most iconic image of the space race, is in fact a ‘throwback’ — more craftwork than Kraftwerk.”

Tags: ,

Charlotte Moorman models Nam June Paik’s “TV-Bra for Living Sculpture,” 1969.

Tags: ,

« Older entries § Newer entries »