2013

You are currently browsing the yearly archive for 2013.

In “Change the World,” George Packer’s excellent New Yorker article about the intermingling of Silicon Valley and the Washington Beltway, one insider neatly summed up why technologists might be a positive force for political change: “Our voice carries a lot of weight because we are broadly popular with Americans.” That was certainly true until recently, with the nerds having had their revenge, the clever children bringing the future to us now, the turtlenecked gurus encouraged to treat their marked-up gadgets as holy grails. But do you get the sense that those good feelings are beginning to change, that, perhaps the Digital Revolution, like most revolutions do, has gotten messy, and that those who stormed the gates now seem a little barbaric?

From the excellent Matt Novak at Paleofuture, a document that recalls how one 1960s Internet visionary predicted superwealth for a breed of people who were then high school freshmen and younger:

In 1969, internet pioneer Paul Baran predicted that by the year 2000, computer programmers may very well be the richest people in the world. Remember, this is when Bill Gates was just a 14-year-old nerd in Seattle.

The ARPANET had not yet drawn its first breath when Baran wrote his 1969 paper, ‘On The Impact of the New Communications Media Upon Social Values.’ But his vision for what new communications technology would enable (and sometimes harm) in the last three decades of the 20th century, was disturbingly prescient.

His prediction about the computer programmer of the year 2000 makes one wonder if Baran was a time traveler perhaps warning us about the dot-com bubble:

As communication development evolves, more decision functions will be placed upon computers tied together as a common communications network. Financial success may in the future come to depend more upon the brilliance and imagination of the human who programs the computer than upon any other single factor. The key man in the new power elite will be the one who can best program a computer, that is, the person who makes the best use of the available information and the computer’s skills in formulating a problem.”

Tags: , ,

After exhaustive research, medicine has uncovered the cause of throat cancer.

After exhaustive research, the medical world finally uncovered the cause of throat cancer.

You know, that box tasted funny.

You know, that box tasted funny.

"

One would hope that premarital sex was rare in Greeley, Colorado, in early 1900s, as one resident learned during that era that her intended was also her immediate relative. From the February 24, 1914 New York Times:

Greeley, Col.–Just as they were leaving to procure a marriage license and have the nuptial knot tied by a Justice of the Peace. Miss Mary Hardy, a homesteader near Buckingham, Weld County, discovered that Frank Cameron, a neighboring homesteader, to whom she was engaged, was her brother. Miss Hardy fainted, and it was some time before she could be revived.

The discovery of the relationship between Miss Hardy and Cameron, the real name of both being Howard, was brought about through Cameron wearing for the first time in her presence a small gold ring with a peculiar button setting as a fob for his watch chain.

‘Where did you get that ring?’ faltered Miss Hardy, as she noticed and then inspected it.

‘My sister gave me that to remember her by the last time I saw her twenty-three years ago,’ answered Cameron, astonished at her agitation.

‘Then you are my brother!’ exclaimed Miss Hardy and fainted.

When Miss Hardy was revived she proved their relationship beyond all doubt by going to her jewel box and taking from it a silver coin bearing the date of her brother’s birth and his initials, which he had engraved when a boy.

It appears that the brother and sister were deserted in childhood by their parents and later were adopted in different families.”

 

Tags: ,

If you think Fruitarians are ridiculous, you should meet Breatharians, who believe that food and water are superfluous. Tom Snyder met a prominent one, Wiley Brooks, in 1981.

Tags: ,

Julian Assange makes a raft of good points in his New York Times Op-Ed piece about the globalizing effect of the Googleplex and its arrogant brand of technocracy. But because he’s the kind of exasperating person who sees the world only in extremes, Assange goes too far in painting the company as unmitigated autocratic evil. If you think we’re going to become the United States of Google, let’s recall that Microsoft was not too long similarly feared, and even without government intervention, it would have collapsed beneath its own weight because that’s usually what corporate behemoths do. And Google is nowhere near the tool of American governmental policy that Bell Labs was. You remember Bell Labs, right? It used to be a thing. An excerpt from Assange’s article, which is inspired by the book, The New Digital Age:

“The writing is on the wall, but the authors cannot see it. They borrow from William Dobson the idea that the media, in an autocracy, ‘allows for an opposition press as long as regime opponents understand where the unspoken limits are.’ But these trends are beginning to emerge in the United States. No one doubts the chilling effects of the investigations into The Associated Press and Fox’s James Rosen. But there has been little analysis of Google’s role in complying with the Rosen subpoena. I have personal experience of these trends.

The Department of Justice admitted in March that it was in its third year of a continuing criminal investigation of WikiLeaks. Court testimony states that its targets include ‘the founders, owners, or managers of WikiLeaks.’ One alleged source, Bradley Manning, faces a 12-week trial beginning tomorrow, with 24 prosecution witnesses expected to testify in secret.

This book is a balefully seminal work in which neither author has the language to see, much less to express, the titanic centralizing evil they are constructing. ‘What Lockheed Martin was to the 20th century,’ they tell us, ‘technology and cybersecurity companies will be to the 21st.’ Without even understanding how, they have updated and seamlessly implemented George Orwell’s prophecy. If you want a vision of the future, imagine Washington-backed Google Glasses strapped onto vacant human faces — forever. Zealots of the cult of consumer technology will find little to inspire them here, not that they ever seem to need it. But this is essential reading for anyone caught up in the struggle for the future, in view of one simple imperative: Know your enemy.

Tags:

Physicists are as adorable as poodles, what with their Theory of Everything and their Multiverse and such. As some grow more desperate to tie everything together and prove they have the answers, you realize that not everything can be correct and some of it is poetry rather than science. From a new Aeon article on the topic by Margaret Wertheim:

“Most physicists are Platonists. They believe that the mathematical relationships they discover in the world about us represent some kind of transcendent truth existing independently from, and perhaps a priori to, the physical world. In this way of seeing, the universe came into being according to a mathematical plan, what the British physicist Paul Davies has called ‘a cosmic blueprint’. Discovering this ‘plan’ is a goal for many theoretical physicists and the schism in the foundation of their framework is thus intensely frustrating. It’s as if the cosmic architect has designed a fiendish puzzle in which two apparently incompatible parts must be fitted together. Both are necessary, for both theories make predictions that have been verified to a dozen or so decimal places, and it is on the basis of these theories that we have built such marvels as microchips, lasers, and GPS satellites.

Quite apart from the physical tensions that exist between them, relativity and quantum theory each pose philosophical problems. Are space and time fundamental qualities of the universe, as general relativity suggests, or are they byproducts of something even more basic, something that might arise from a quantum process? Looking at quantum mechanics, huge debates swirl around the simplest situations. Does the universe split into multiple copies of itself every time an electron changes orbit in an atom, or every time a photon of light passes through a slit? Some say yes, others say absolutely not.

Theoretical physicists can’t even agree on what the celebrated waves of quantum theory mean. What is doing the ‘waving’? Are the waves physically real, or are they just mathematical representations of probability distributions? Are the ‘particles’ guided by the ‘waves’? And, if so, how? The dilemma posed by wave-particle duality is the tip of an epistemological iceberg on which many ships have been broken and wrecked.”

Tags:

Once retired from show business, John Hodgman, meals will be provided for you, although you will be required to take nourishment in solitude. You will have ready access to shampoo, rope and matches. Almanacs and other encouragements of excruciating minutiae will be verboten. You will die alone, in conversation with a sled.

John Hodgman: Ben Stein, with better politics.

John Hodgman: Ben Stein, with better politics.

Tags:

Snake Dream (New York)

I had a dream that I was taking a shit on the floor of my apartment and a snake or something like it was in the feces. I am a male in my mid-30s and I think my girlfriend was there. I can’t entirely remember if it was her, but definitely a woman. Any ideas as to what this dream might mean? I’ve looked on some dream websites but they say different things. 

From the May 17, 1875 Brooklyn Daily Eagle:

“A rather curious freak of a somnambulist is reported as having occurred on Saturday night at No. 669 Bedford Avenue, in this city. At the place mentioned a young man named Chandler Cobb, whose abode is in the town of Wilmington, Vermont, has been on a brief visit to his relative, Mr. Snyder, and during the time has slept in the same bed with another young man named William Martin. Cobb, it seems, is subject to attacks of somnambulism, and while in that state has been known to leave the couch and wander about the dwelling and even out onto the streets. Well, on this occasion, he took one of those walking spells, and after getting up was seized with an idea that Martin was going to shoot him, and so he took a chair and proceeded to beat that unfortunate youth, who was fast asleep, over the head, and did it so energetically for several moments that the other occupants were aroused from their slumbers by the unearthly screams of the victim. While in the act of beating his friend, Cobb became wide awake, and then seemed to be seized with a temporary attack of insanity, for he ran wild down to the store floor, and in his efforts to escape from his imaginary foe, through a large pane of plate glass door, and in so doing was very seriously cut about the head, hands and legs.”

Tags: , ,

Remember at last year’s Republican Convention when Texas Congressman Ted Cruz was all but christened as a future President by lazy pundits simply because he was in the GOP and had an Hispanic name? None of these well-paid shoutbots actually stopped to notice that Cruz was a paranoid wackjob un-electable in a national contest even in the sovereign country of Upper Nixonia. 

Mark Warner, former Virginia Governor, was once that guy for the other party. A Southern liberal technocrat made left-leaning politicos salivate before they became aware that shifting demographics were jumbling the electoral map. In 2006, the very talented political reporter Matt Bai wrote a cover story for the New York Times Magazine about Warner as the apparent anti-Hillary. You heard rumors by 2008 about why Warner ultimately passed on a campaign, but who knows why he didn’t run? We should all pause the next time someone is “nominated” because they fit into certain categories. Barack Obama, who most certainly did not fit into any of them, is mentioned almost as an afterthought in Bai’s piece. The opening of the article, which is now largely remembered for the altered colors of the eccentric cover art:

“If you harbor serious thoughts of running for the presidency, the first thing you do — long before you commission any polls or make any ads, years before you charter planes to take you back and forth between Iowa and New Hampshire — is to sit down with guys like Chris Korge. A real-estate developer in Coral Gables, outside Miami, Korge is one of the Democratic Party’s most proficient “bundlers.” That is, in the last two presidential elections, he bundled together more than $7 million in campaign checks for Al Gore and John Kerry from his friends and contacts.

For Korge, the 2008 presidential campaign began a few days after Kerry lost, when, he says, one prospective candidate — he won’t say who — called to enlist his help. Having raised money for both of Bill Clinton’s presidential campaigns, which earned him an overnight stay in the Lincoln Bedroom, Korge already knew he would support Hillary Clinton if she ran; he considers her the most impressive politician he has ever met, including her husband. But that didn’t stop her potential rivals — John EdwardsJoe Biden, Evan Bayh, Wesley Clark — from dropping by, nor did it stop Korge, a guy who rightly prides himself on knowing just about everybody in Democratic politics, from taking the meetings. ‘In the last six months, I’ve pretty much seen or talked with all of them, or they’ve tried to meet with me,’ Korge told me during a conversation in late January.

A few weeks before we spoke, Korge had lunch at the Capital Grille in Miami with Mark Warner, who was then in his final weeks as Virginia’s governor. Though little known nationally, Warner has emerged in recent months as the bright new star in the constellation of would-be candidates, a source of curiosity among Democrats searching for a charismatic outsider to lead the party. Pundits credit Warner’s popularity in Republican-dominated Virginia — his 80 percent approval rating when he left office made him one of the most adored governors in the state’s history — with enabling his Democratic lieutenant governor, Tim Kaine, to win the election to succeed him last November. Suddenly, Warner is being mentioned near the top of every list of candidates vying for the nomination in 2008.”

Tags: , ,

It will be called: John Hodgman: I Have Agreed to Stop. Then you will be allowed to peacefully exit show business, like Idi Amin being exiled from Uganda on a full stomach. Your safe passage is ensured.

John Hodgman: Clearly there's no point.

John Hodgman: Clearly there’s no point.

Tags:

Graphic User Interface and sleek product design turned cold computers into must-have accessories, and MIT roboticist and artist Alexander Reben realizes that aesthetics can do the same for ‘bots. And that’s true for better or worse: That thing that is taking my job and trying to murder me is as cute as a kitten–and it talks!

The creator of Boxie the Cute Robot describes his work thusly: “These robots use their cuteness to get people to answer questions that are then made into a documentary filmed by the robot’s internal camera.” Reben just started doing an Ask Me Anything on Reddit. A few exchanges and a video follow.

_____________________

Question:

This is such a charming concept! Do you feel that this kind of exterior design is key in human-robot relations, rather than trying to make robots that look just like us? Some inventors feel that we identify with things the more they are like us, yet you have been able to get people to confess their deepest secrets to a cardboard box with eyes and a smile. What would you say to those who believe the only way to produce human-robot relations is through something like this?

Alexander Reben:

Yes, the design of the exterior shell plays a huge part in the success of the project. Even designing the perfect “robot smile” was super important to make the robot appear non-judgmental. My design philosophy is that of an anamorphism of a living thing. These robots were designed to give the impression that they are a “baby robot”, not a person at all. While no such thing actually exists naturally, our brain interprets things such as a big head and wide set eyes as baby like. I think the robot you linked to is scary. I believe most applications for social robots will work best with robots who look like robots, cute robots included.

_____________________

Question:

What is the most interesting thing that came out of this project for you and the other people you worked on this with? Did you find any challenges with the Boxie/BlabDroid project that you didn’t expect when you started? What was the biggest challenge in making it a success?

Alexander Reben:

The most interesting thing is that everyone had a great experience with the robots. If you watch the videos you see some people get really deep with them, some even crying. However, nobody asked for the video to not be used (everyone knows the robots are filming them). It was almost the inverse, the more people told the robots, the better the interaction. Many described it as a “cathartic” experience.

_____________________

Question:

What are you planning to do with the little robots now? It seems like the pricing of the robots would be prohibitive to the average buyer, which might have been due to the quality of camera and connectivity of the robots. Are you looking at creating a version of these robots that are more expendable and cheaper for people to use?

Alexander Reben:

Right now, we plan to bring the robots around the world to meet new people and “learn more about the humans that inhabit earth.” They will be at the Doc/Fest festival in Sheffield England next week. We would love to get them other places like for a talk show segment or TV show.

Indeed, we are planning to bring the cost of the robots down to the price range of a premium Bluetooth accessory. Our plan is to allow the user to use their cellphone camera as the robot’s camera, thereby making them cheaper yet still getting high quality video. We also want to open source the protocols used to control the robot so people can hack them. We are still very optimistic because everyone who sees a BlabDroid in person wants one!

••••••••••

“If there was no money and no law, what would be the first thing you would do?”

Tags:

Molly Knight, one of the excellent parts of that mixed blessing known as ESPN, has a new article in the New York Times Magazine about “Stalker Sarah,” a Los Angeles teen who’s found value of a kind in the detritus of modern celebrity. The girl chases down celebs at airports and restaurants not to snap pap photos to make a buck but to share cell-phone shots with those who are of the moment or on the cusp. Posting these images to the Internet affords her a different sort of wealth–notoriety by (fleeting) proximity. Although it’s ultimately sad as stories about fame almost always are, this piece is no Day of the Locust. It’s about a well-intentioned person with questionable priorities in an age of media anarchy, a time when focus is less important than click. An excerpt:

“In L.A., stalking celebrities may not be the most dignified job in the world, but it can pay the bills. A nonexclusive photograph of a celebrity can earn a few hundred dollars. The most prolific paparazzi can sell five or six sets of pictures a day and earn about $10,000 a month, but many operate under the premise that they are one groping photo away from a major payoff. A photo’s main value, after all, depends largely on what the star is doing. ‘You could get a photo of Brad Pitt just standing there, and you wouldn’t sell it,’ says Henry Flores, who co-owns the agency Buzz Foto. ‘I have taken photos of Angelina and Brad holding hands, and I couldn’t even sell it.’ But Flores earned $30,000 for a photograph he took five years ago of Britney Spears being loaded into an ambulance. The photographs last summer that showed Kristen Stewart kissing Rupert Sanders, her married Snow White and the Huntsman director, may have sold for up to $250,000, Melanie Bromley, the former West Coast bureau chief of US Weekly, told The Los Angeles Times.

In pursuit of these career-defining moments, the most successful paparazzi spend years cultivating relationships with not only managers and publicists, but also restaurant workers and trainers. ‘You can’t be covered in tattoos and dressed like a gangster if you want to be successful at what we do,’ Flores says. Many star handlers reward these less-threatening photographers with choreographed exclusives, but the business is still littered with less-polished free agents who chase stars in their cars or photograph their children on school grounds. Ninety-five percent of paparazzi, it seems, are men, many of whom go by the sort of nicknames — like the Fingerbreaker and Cheesecake — that you would expect to hear on a minor-league hockey team. Mostly, though, they stand around waiting for something to happen.

Sarah is very much a part of their circle, trading texts and tips with them. The paparazzi have accepted her for strategic reasons. In the era of YouTube and reality TV, there are simply more people than ever before who qualify as famous, and their every move is seemingly reported in a never-ending proliferation of gossip sites and blogs. Perhaps only a teenager could possess the energy and technical aptitude to serve as the global tracking device for it all. Sarah is incredibly adept at recognizing even the most minor celebrities and has a much better sense than her older colleagues about which seem ready to break huge. Scooter Braun, the 31-year-old talent manager of Justin Bieber, Carly Rae Jepsen, Psy and the Wanted, considers it part of his job to follow Sarah’s whereabouts on social-networking sites. It also helps that she’s nice to his clients. ‘The thing is, she’s not overbearing,’ he told me. ‘She respects people’s space. She’ll say, ‘Do you mind if I get a picture?’ And if you’re like, ‘Not right now, Sarah,’ she’s like, ‘No problem.’ And she’s just a very sweet, sweet person.’

Most celebrity photographers yearn to catch a star at their most defenseless, but Sarah tends to think of them as friends.”

Tags: ,

Bazooka Joe: Eye lost to knife fight on pier.

In 1975, Joe Garagiola hosted a remarkably stupid and wonderful bubble-gum blowing competition among baseball players, which was sponsored by Bazooka, a brand of gum favored by hoboes during World War II. One entrant was Philadelphia catcher Tim McCarver, whose head was the size of a medicine ball. The moment the contest ended, the players went in search of the nastiest groupies they could find.

Tags: ,

  • I cannot fucking believe that scarecrows still work. #startingtolosefaithincrows
That corn does not belong to you.

That corn does not belong to you.

He makes a persuasive case.

The gentleman makes a persuasive case.


10 search-engine keyphrases bringing traffic to Afflictor this week:

  1. maysles salesman 1968
  2. if i didn’t have anal sex can my butt still itch if i had gonorrhea?
  3. alan abel tiny penis hoax
  4. information about facial attractiveness
  5. marvin minsky on the set of 2001: a space odyssey
  6. liberace and cassius clay together
  7. bobby fischer when he was a young chess champion
  8. harold bloom comments about the tea party
  9. david bowie the elephant man on broadway
  10. is it legal to pay someone to hold their baby?
Afflictor: Hearing that Jean Stapleton passed away....

Afflictor: Hearing that Jean Stapleton passed away….

...soon after learning that the Bea Arthur painter had also profiled...

…soon after learning that the Bea Arthur tits painter had also profiled…

...Norman Fell's nutsac.

…Norman Fell’s nutsac.

  • Jaron Lanier explains the hidden costs of free in the Digital Age.
  • A brief note from 1911 about an optimist.

Please Stop

John Hodgman seems like a very nice man. I just wish that he would stop.

John Hodgman seems like a very nice man. I just wish that he would stop.

Tags:

China is speeding into the future–or at least catching up to the present–by using methods of industrialization which created great wealth in the West but have compromised our ecology. Evan Osnos of the New Yorker has an excellent interview on the topic with Craig Simons, a journalist who spent most of the aughts reporting from China on that nation’s unbridled growth. An excerpt:

Evan Osnos: 

The Times reported this month that Chinese protesters succeeded in delaying the I.P.O. of a company that specializes in extracting bile from captive bears for the production of folk remedies. What kinds of campaigns have impact, and what kinds don’t?

Craig Simons: 

N.G.O.s have had a limited ability to influence the decisions of average Chinese consumers. A group of advertisements by WildAid (including one where Yao Ming swears off shark-fin soup) have been successful and are important. But their benefits are offset by millions of Chinese just now becoming rich enough to buy exotic ingredients and medicines. The campaigns may ultimately prove more important by putting pressure on Beijing. The international community, for example, has successfully lobbied against Beijing legalizing the sale of bones from farmed tigers, a move many scientists argue would doom the world’s remaining wild tigers. In short, a government ban is more efficient than trying to get 1.3 billion people to change deep-rooted beliefs and traditions, but both are key in the long term.

Evan Osnos: 

You went to the four corners of the world for this. What was the moment that lingers most?

Craig Simons:

Strangely enough, the most vivid moment came when I was researching in Washington, D.C. I came across a request by environmental groups that Arkansas ban the collection of wild turtles, many of which were being shipped to China, as food. Their driving argument was that if officials didn’t stop the hunt, several species would be wiped out. The petition contained a few surprising figures: licensed collectors removed more than half a million turtles from Arkansas between 2004 and 2006; more than two hundred and fifty thousand ‘wild caught adult turtles’ were exported to Asia from a single airport over a span of four years. But it was the proximity that struck me. I’d expected to link Chinese demand to tiger poaching in India, logging in Papua New Guinea, and (renewed) mining in Colorado. But I’d never thought that decisions by Chinese diners could threaten Arkansas’s terrapins.”

Tags: ,

I’ve posted before about the Evacuated Tube Transport, which, like Elon Musk’s Hyperloop, is another potential way for faster and more efficient travel. In case some of you weren’t reading back the site back then, here’s a new piece from Melissa Knowles at Yahoo! about ET3’s proposed transporter of cargo (and, eventually, people):

“The tubes would be set up like freeways to prevent crowding and traffic congestion problems. Plus, ET3 claims that passengers need not worry about feeling discomfort while traveling at such high speeds. The high velocity at which the tubes move is equal to 1G of force at top speed, which is similar to the force felt by someone traveling in a car on the freeway.

Daryl Oster, the founder and CEO of ET3, says that he got the idea for the tube transport system when he visited China back in the 1980s.

When and if the tubes make their debut in the next decade, they will initially be used to transport cargo, not people.”

 

Tags: ,

sparring club opening (medford)

I’m looking for fighters who want to train and beat the shit out of each other…period. Controlled sparring. Must be at least 18.

Essential to seriously reducing greenhouse gases is one of these things: a voluntary diminution of meat in our diets or a lab-based version replacing the actual one. I’m a vegetarian for health reasons as well as ethical and environmental ones, so I won’t eat it anyway. But will carnivores accept a faux version it it looks and tastes pretty much like the real thing? Will it be as palatable to the mind as it is to the mouth? My guess is that epicureans will have a tough time with it, though fast-food junkies who don’t want to stretch their wallets will be amenable. (It’s a very expensive process right now but will likely eventually be cheap.) The opening of an article about futuristic farming from Jennifer Wang at Entrepreneur.com:

“Here’s a crazy idea: Combine 3-D printing and tissue engineering to ‘print’ animal products and tackle some of the planet’s biggest problems. Animal farming, after all, accounts for about half of all human-caused greenhouse gases, taking place on one-third of the available, non-frozen land on Earth. All to feed people’s appetites for 300 million tons of meat a year.

Enter Gabor and Andras Forgacs, father-and-son founders of Modern Meadow, a company they started in 2011 that may very well be the model for the farm of the future.

Five years earlier they helped start Organovo, a firm that makes human tissues for pharmaceutical research and other medical applications, and was a commercial spinoff of Gabor’s pioneering work at the University of Missouri in ‘bioprinting,’ which he describes as ‘extending biological structures in three dimensions.’ Modern Meadow’s output is based in part on this work. On a basic level, the process involves using 3-D printing to deposit clumps of cells into patterns of tissue. The particles fuse post-printing–similar to cell development in embryos. Unlike Organovo’s final products, which must be kept alive, Modern Meadow’s postmortem animal tissues are simpler to build and faster to market.”

Tags: , ,

David Cornwell, a.k.a. John le Carré, appears in 1964 on To Tell the Truth, newly a white-hot writer thanks to The Spy Who Came in From the Cold. Begins at the 8:30 mark.

Tags: ,

Facebook cofounder and leading Obama technologist Chris Hughes made the surprising decision to shift to old media when he purchased the New Republic. It hasn’t all been smooth. For his premiere issue, Hughes elbowed aside Steve Brill’s epic health-insurance piece, which became a sensation for Time, in order to run a pedestrian cover-story interview with the President. But there’s also been lots of great stuff during his brief tenure.

Hughes and other tech entrepreneurs are backing GiveDirectly, a system that removes the often expensive middleman from charitable giving. From Kerry A. Dolan in Forbes:

“Paul Niehaus, an assistant professor of economics at UC San Diego and a board member of GiveDirect, came up with the idea of transferring money to poor people’s cell phones back in 2008. He was working with the Indian government to limit corruption and saw how the government there transferred money to people’s phones. ‘I realized I could do that myself,’ Niehaus told me. He told the gathering in San Francisco that most of the money that’s donated to help poor people goes to international development organizations, not poor people directly.  GiveDirectly’s giving has had ‘big impacts on nutrition, education, land and livestock’ and ‘hasn’t been shown to increase how much people drink,’ Niehaus emphasized. ‘A typical poor person is poor not because he is irresponsible, but because he was born in Africa.’

GiveDirectly finds poor households – typically people who live in mud huts with thatched roofs – and uses a system called M-Pesa, run by Vodafone , to transfer money to their cell phones.  Transaction fees eat up a mere 3 cents per donated dollar. Niehaus says plenty of recipients use the money to upgrade their homes by adding a metal roof.”

Tags: ,

There’s going to be an announcement of some sort in June regarding Elon Musk’s Hyperloop high-speed transportation system, my favorite thing which is not yet a thing. From the Verge:

“Following his announcement of Tesla’s dramatic Supercharger station expansion, CEO Elon Musk touched on another pet project: Hyperloop. The rapid transit system would connect downtown Los Angeles with San Francisco, 380 miles away. Musk told the crowd that more details for the project would be available on June 20th.

Musk denigrated California’s current high speed rail plans, pointing out that the bullet train currently under consideration will be both the slowest in the world and most expensive per mile — ‘not the superlatives you’re looking for.’ In contrast, the Hyperloop would be ‘a cross between a Concorde, a rail gun, and an air hockey table.’ Musk joked, ‘even if I’m wrong about the economic assumptions, it would be a really fun ride.'”

Tags:

« Older entries § Newer entries »