2013

You are currently browsing the yearly archive for 2013.

Some studies suggest we’re more honest if we feel we’re being watched, even if the eyes aren’t human. A well-placed painting with an observing face seems to have a profound effect on our behavior. In a similar vein: Can nature received through technology be a reasonable replacement for actual nature? The opening of Sue Thomas’ new Aeon article, “Technobiophilia“:

“There are fish in my phone. Some are pure orange with white fins; others have black mottled markings along their orange backs. They glide, twist and turn above a bed of flat pale sand fringed by rocks and the bright green leaves of something that looks like watercress. Sometimes they swim out of view, leaving me to gaze at the empty scene in the knowledge that they will soon reappear. When I gently press my finger against the screen, the water ripples and the fish swim away. Eventually, they cruise out from behind the Google widget, appear from underneath the Facebook icon, or sneak around the corner of Contacts. This is Koi Live Wallpaper, an app designed for smartphones. The idea of an aquarium inside my phone appeals to my sense of humour and makes me smile. But I suspect its true appeal is more complicated than that.

In 1984, the psychiatrist Aaron Katcher and his team at the University of Pennsylvania conducted an experiment in the busy waiting room of a dentist’s office. On some days, before the surgery opened, the researchers installed an aquarium with tropical fish. On other days, they took it away. They measured the patients’ levels of anxiety in both environments, and the results were clear. On ‘aquarium days’, patients were less anxious and more compliant during the surgery. Katcher concluded that the presence of these colourful living creatures had a calming influence on people about to receive dental treatment. Then in 1990, Judith Heerwagen and colleagues at the University of Washington in Seattle found the same calming effect using a large nature mural instead of an aquarium in the waiting room of a specialist ‘dental fears’ clinic. A third experiment by the environmental psychologist Roger Ulrich and colleagues at Texas A&M University in 2003 found that stressed blood donors experienced lowered blood pressure and pulse rates while sitting in a room where a videotape of a nature scene was playing. The general conclusion was that visual exposure to nature not only diminished patient stress but also reduced physical pain. I’m not in pain when I look at my mobile, though I might well be stressed. Is that why I take time to gaze at my virtual aquarium?

A simple answer to this question is no. Katcher’s fish were real. Mine are animations. But there is increasing evidence that we respond very similarly to a ‘natural’ environment, whether it’s real or virtual, and research confirms that even simulated nature experiences can be remarkably powerful.”

Tags:

You can’t fret too much about what Jeff Bezos aims to do with the Washington Post because the paper’s only plans before its sale were funeral plans. His experimentation with a last-legs property is the best-case for all involved–and we’re all involved. From an ABC News interview with him:

“While Bezos doesn’t plan to turn one of the nation’s leading newspapers into a shopping site, he certainly plans to get more out of the business and he says there are business pillars from Amazon.com that can apply to the newspaper industry

‘The big things that we focus on at Amazon, those serve the Amazon customers well and they would transfer to other kinds of businesses,’ Bezos said in a sit-down interview with ABC News earlier. ‘The first thing is put the customer first. If you have a party, are you holding the party for your guests or for yourself?

‘Sometimes people hold parties and they pretend it is for their guests, but they are holding it for themselves. The second is we like to invent. The third piece is we are willing to think long term.’

‘Customer centricity, willingness to invent and willingness to be patient,’ Bezos said, citing tenets that were applicable to a number of industries when asked directly how he could bring aspects of Amazon’s business to the newspaper and media business.

Ultimately, we don’t know much about what Bezos, whose net worth is said to be $27.2 billion, will do tactically at the Post, but it is clear that, above all, he is dedicated and focused on bringing the paper into the 21st century.”

Tags:

Garry Kasparov is a real-life John Henry, having been felled by the steam-powered hammer of IBM’s Deep Blue. He was the chess king as we were being dethroned by automation, as computers came to rule games–and other things. Kasparov now dabbles in Putin-punching and writing. I’m glad he does the former and wish he would do more of the latter. He’s a very gifted writer.

Below is a recent interview about chess and politics the just-departed David Frost did with the chess champ.

Tags: ,

Lemonade stands raising money for right-wing extremism.

 

Immigrants aren't like you and I.

Immigrants aren’t like you and I.

Mother will never disobey Father again.

Mother will never disobey Father that way again.

I've been meaning to call that nice man from the John Birch Society.

I should call that nice man from the John Birch Society.

I think I murdered a social worker.

I think I murdered a social worker.

Just 10¢ a cup.

Just made a fresh pitcher.

Alfred Hitchcock, deeply brilliant, and a real creep, not just a pretend one, participated in a 1976 press conference, moderated by Richard Schickel of Time, for Family Plot. One unidentified reporter asked an interesting question, wondering if shocking actual events, like that era’s sensational Patty Hearst case, made it more difficult for a thriller writer to surprise audiences. The filmmaker ultimately acknowledged that he was “fighting headlines all the time.”

Tags: ,

Auto-correct, that imperfect thing, is both boon and bane. Steve Wozniak wants his spoken words corrected also. From the Apple co-founder’s interview with Nate Lanxon of Wired UK:

Since doing so in the 1970s with Steve Jobs, Wozniak has turned much of his attention, time and money to education and new businesses. Presently serving as chief scientist at flash storage company Fusion-io, he also readily invests in new technologies and applications. ‘The best things that capture your imagination are ones you hadn’t thought of before,’ says Wozniak, ‘and that aren’t talked about in the news all the time.’

High on the list of ideal candidates are apps that take a smarter approach to the use of human speech, ones ‘where you talk to it like a normal person,’ he says, ‘the way you would talk to a human being.’

‘I want to be able to speak with errors in my wording, errors in my grammar,’ he continues. ‘When you type things into Google search it corrects your words. With speech, I want it to be general enough, smart enough, to know ‘no, he couldn’t have meant these words that I think he said. He must have really meant something similar.’ That’s going to take a lot of software, a lot of artificial intelligence work over the next five to ten years.'”

 

Tags: ,

In a recent Reuters column that reminds that hard news was never commercially viable in America, Jack Shafer makes an excellent suggestion that will almost definitely be ignored: that ABC become a non-profit arm of ESPN, doing serious journalism as a public good. An excerpt:

“As philanthropists take the seat in the story room once held by politicians, we should be glad. But not too glad, because there will never be enough philanthropists to restore the status quo ante. Nor will the market create enough billionaires like Jeff Bezos who are willing to rescue drowning newspapers like the Washington Post. Wishful thinkers — I’m one — can hope for media giants like Bloomberg and ESPN, now the most valuable media property in the United States, to be persuaded to add noncommercial news to their bundles. (Perhaps ABC News, which is owned by one of ESPN’s co-owners, could be repositioned as the noncommercial face of ESPN.)”

Tags:

From the December 12, 1901 New York Times:

Washington–Cannibalism has appeared in the varied list of crimes charged against Filipinos by American military courts. According to the record of a court-martial convened in the Department of the Viscayas, Raymond Fonte, a native, found his working companion, Liberato Benliro, sleeping in his (Fonte’s) boat. He became enraged, killed the slumbering man with a blow of an oar, cut off his nose and ears, and, according to his own confession, cooked and ate part of the body. He was sentenced to be hanged at Capiz, Panay, on Dec. 13.”

Tags: ,

I tend to think of analytics in sports as a recent invention, but Tom Landry, square-jawed coach of America’s Team–God’s Team, really–the Dallas Cowboys, was apparently a computer-friendly technocrat back in the 1970s. From “Tom Landry Is a Believer: in Himself, His Printouts, His Cowboys and His Lord,” Kent Demaret’s 1977 People article about the laconic leader:

“The process starts on Monday. Game films from the day before are shown, and each player’s performance evaluated and graded. That done, Landry turns to computer printouts—bound into a book the size of the Manhattan phone directory—for a minute analysis of the next opponent. The computer reveals what plays they used under what conditions and how often. As the week progresses Landry and his coaching staff absorb the mass of data, design countermoves and settle on a game plan for both offense and defense. The offense is rarely changed. ‘You don’t spend three days working up a game plan and getting all the players ready, only to change it during a 10-minute halftime,’ Landry says. ‘You just go out there and execute it better than they can execute a defense against it.’ Such intensive preparation motivates the team, he adds, far more successfully than locker room histrionics. ‘Confidence comes from knowing what you’re doing,’ says Landry. ‘If you are prepared for something, you usually do it. If not, you usually fall flat on your face.’

Not all those who now play or have played for Landry admire his push-button approach.”•

________________________

“I’m one of the best-known cowboys in Texas,” 1986:

Tags: ,

I know I said I would stop, but there is one more interview from David Frost’s 1970 book, The Americans, that I want to excerpt. It’s an exchange about privacy the host had with Ramsey Clark, the noted Department of Justice lawyer. At the outset of this segment, Clark is commenting about wiretapping, though he broadens his remarks to regard privacy in general:

Ramsey Clark:

[It’s] an immense waste, an immoral sort of thing.

David Frost:

Immoral in what sense?

Ramsey Clark:

Well, immoral in the sense that government has to be fair. Government has to concede the dignity of its citizens. If the government can’t protect its citizens with fairness, we’re in real trouble, aren’t we? And it’s always ironic to me that those who urge wiretapping strongest won’t give more money for police salaries to bring real professionalism and real excellence to law enforcement, which is so essential to our safety.

They want an easy way, they want a cheap way. They want a way that demeans the integrity of the individual, of all of our citizens. We can’t overlook the capabilities of our technology. We can destroy privacy, we really can. We have techniques now–and we’re only on the threshold of discovery–that can permeate brick walls three feet thick. 

David Frost:

How? What sorts of things?

Ramsey Clark:

You can take a laser beam and you put it on a resonant surface within the room, and you can pick up any vibration in that room, any sound within that room, from half a mile away.

David Frost:

I think that’s terrifying.

Ramsey Clark:

You know, we can do it with sound and lights, in other words, visual-audio invasion of privacy is possible, and if we really worked at it with the technology that we have, in a few years we could destroy privacy as we know it.

Privacy is pretty hard to retain anyway in a mass society, a highly urbanized society, and if we don’t discipline ourselves now to traditions of privacy and to traditions of the integrity of the individual, we can have a generation of youngsters quite soon that won’t know what it meant because it wasn’t here when they came.•

Tags: ,

Did agriculture lead to complex societies or was it something less nurturing? Cliodynamics provides an alternative cause: war. From Klint Finley at Wired:

“The standard theory, which [Peter] Turchin calls the ‘bottom up’ theory, is that humans invented agriculture around 10,000 years ago, providing resource surpluses that freed people up for other ventures. But what Turchin and his team have found is that the bottom-up theory is wrong, or at least incomplete. ‘Competitions between societies, which historically took the form of warfare, drive the evolution of complex societies,’ he says.

To test the two competing theories, Turchin and company designed two mathematical models for predicting the spread of complex societies. One based only on agriculture, ecology and geography. The other included those three factors, plus warfare. Then, they used data from historical atlases to determine whether these models matched up with the way the different states and empires actually evolved.

The model that included warfare predicted about 65 percent of the historical variance, while the agricultural model explained only about 16 percent, suggesting that warfare was more important in the spread of social norms that lead to complex societies.”

Tags: ,

My knowledge of Second Life doesn’t go far beyond the episode of the American version of The Office in which Jim hassled Dwight, avatar to avatar, with harasser emerging diminished, realizing the great distance between himself and his ideal of himself. The game that desired to mirror our modern world, while no longer so prominent in the popular culture, still apparently chugs along. From “Second Life’s Strange Second Life,”  Chris Stokel-Walker’s Verge article:

“Do you remember Second Life? Set up by developer Linden Lab in 2003, it was the faithful replication of our modern world where whoring, drinking, and fighting were acceptable. It was the place where big brands moved in as neighbors and hawked you their wares online. For many, it was the future — our lives were going to be lived online, as avatars represented us in nightclubs, bedrooms, and banks made of pixels and code. 

In the mid-2000s, every self-respecting media outlet sent reporters to the Second Life world to cover the parallel-universe beat. The BBC, (now Bloomberg) Businessweek, and NBC Nightly News all devoted time and coverage to the phenomenon. Amazon, American Apparel, and Disney set up shop in Second Life, aiming to capitalize on the momentum it was building — and to play to the in-world consumer base, which at one point in 2006 boasted a GDP of $64 million. 

Of course, stratospheric growth doesn’t continue forever, and when the universe’s expansion slowed and the novelty of people living parallel lives wore off, the media moved on. So did businesses — but not users. Linden Lab doesn’t share historical user figures, but it says the population of Second Life has been relatively stable for a number of years.

You might not have heard a peep about it since the halcyon days of 2006, but that doesn’t mean Second Life has gone away. Far from it: this past June it celebrated its 10th birthday, and it is still a strong community. A million active users still log on and inhabit the world every month, and 13,000 newbies drop into the community every day to see what Second Lifeis about. I was one of them, and I found out that just because Second Life is no longer under the glare of the media’s spotlight, it doesn’t mean the culture inside the petri dish isn’t still growing.”•

________________________

“It is not a game–it is a multi-user virtual environment”:

Tags:

A deathbed discussion about fantasy football.

 

Monte Ball fumbling in the red zone nearly killed me, but Romo lit up the Rams’ secondary, so I’m good.

I hope there's a heaven.

I hope there’s a heaven.

I mentioned that iconic Let’s Make a Deal host Monty Hall, who would present you with the options and inform you of the benefits and consequences, would be making his debut, at 92, on Marc Maron’s WTF podcast this Thursday. Here’s a brief audio clip of the two discussing Twitter. Hall sounds great.

Tags: ,

“Grab a few brews afterwards.”

Looking for someone to fight me in Octagon. My place.

Am 5’11″, 180lbs. Fit former high school wrestling team member.

Looking for someone close in weight to duel it out with me today, tomorrow. Be real. Knock out or tap out wins. No homo.

Grab a few brews afterwards.

No homo.

Thanks.

"

“Their first movements angered the bird, indicating their nearness to his nest.”

When Ben Franklin wasn’t busy with orgies, teetotalism or inventions, he took a moment to suggest that the turkey be made the United States’ official bird. Not a bad idea. Turkeys are resourceful as hell, can survive almost anything and are pretty good neighbors. The bald eagle, which instead won out, is admired for its fierceness, but such temperament rarely stays in check for long. That was the horrifying lesson learned by two California lads who happened too close to a bald eagle’s nest in 1895. The story from New York Times article of that year:

Ukiah, Mendocino County, Cal.–Clinging to the side of Hill’s Peak, 1,000 feet above the canon bed, Willie and Eddie Briggs, aged thirteen and eleven years, fought a bald eagle for their lives Tuesday. The younger lad was knocked down repeatedly, and so torn by the talons and beak of the bird that he will lose his eyes and be disfigured for life. His life was saved by his brother’s heroic attack on the eagle with a short stick, beating it off. A party of men from Bachelor Valley organized when they heard of the eagle’s attack and succeeded in killing it. The bird measured eight feet eight inches from tip to tip of the wings.

For four years a large eagle has been noticed in the vicinity of Hill’s Peak, and it has been supposed it had a nest in that locality. Hill’s Peak is one of the most inaccessible and dangerous places in the neighborhood of Bachelor Valley. For some time farmers of the valley have missed lambs from their flocks and chickens from their yards, but not until lately did the eagle become so bold as to be caught in the act of making off with a lamb from the flock of Lemuel Briggs.

Seeing the swoop of the bird, Mr. Briggs went to the house for his gun, but before he could return the great American bird was far out of reach. He told his two boys to watch and see if they could find out where the eagle made its nest.

The next day, while tending a flock of sheep some distance from the house, the boys sighted the eagle near the peak and prepared to make the ascent. To do this they had to go up on the divide between Potter Valley and Bachelor Valley and get up back of the mountain on the north side. The south side is inaccessible, being a sheer precipice of about 1,000 feet at the foot of Doyle Creek.

Everything went smoothly with the boys until they were nearing the top, and knowing that the hardest part of their work was yet to come, they took a short rest, and then commenced their laborious work of climbing. The rock near the top is almost perpendicular, and they now had to use the greatest care, for a slip meant a fall to the bottom of the canon.

The boys had reached a little bench and were commencing to get their breath from their hard work, when without the least warning and before Eddie, the youngest, could put himself on his guard, the eagle came swooping down upon them and almost knocked the little fellow over the precipice. So sudden was the descent that they could not tell from which way the bird came.

talons23The eagle now commenced to circle around them, sometimes coming within striking distance. The two boys stood as close together as possible, to combine forces in case of another attack, which they realized would come sooner or later. They also tried to get to a place of safety.

Their first movements angered the bird, indicating their nearness to his nest. Having for their weapons only the short poles they used in climbing, they were, as they soon realized, practically defenseless.

Every movement on their part was watched by the bird, and it was not long before the eagle, with a screech, made for the younger boy, this time knocking him down.

The position in which they were made it almost impossible for one to help the other and they were at the mercy of the fierce bird. The bird seemed to know this and to take advantage of it, and it now became a fight for life with the boys.

They determined, if possible, to retrace their steps. At every turn the eagle came swooping down upon them, making the fiercest attacks upon the smaller boy. Willie tried in every way to encourage his little brother, but from his exertions from climbing and from resisting the fierce attacks of the bird, the lad soon lost his strength and said he could go no further.

Realizing now that his only chance to save his brother would be to draw the bird’s attention to himself, Willie started off, telling Eddie to keep quiet and he would look for some place where they could defend themselves until their father could come to their assistance. He had not gone far when he heard piercing screams from his brother and returned immediately. He found a most horrible sight.

The eagle had pounced upon Eddie and was tearing his face, neck, and head with beak and talons. With almost superhuman effort Willie struck the bird a well-directed blow and it went screaming away. Willie found his brother insensible and covered with blood. He wiped the blood away as best he could, only to find one of Eddie’s eyes protruding from its socket and the other badly injured.

Fearing a new attack, Willie made frantic appeals to his father, whom he saw in the valley below. Loosening a large rock he rolled it down and was rewarded by his father’s attention being drawn upward. The boy made frantic gestures to his father, who saw something was wrong and started for the cliff. He reached them, and by dint of hard work the disfigured boy was carried to his home and medical attention secured. His right eye is lost, and the probability is that the sight of the other is destroyed.

The people in and around the valley organized a party and went out looking for the eagle. They came upon the bird yesterday and succeeded in shooting it.”

Tags: , ,

Even before things were computerized, we wanted them to be, we pretended as if they were. We prepared ourselves for the real thing, when computers would make us more powerful, not yet realizing they might want to keep the power for themselves.

A 1969 commercial for Computer Football, which was not computerized.

The late Robert “Gypsy Boots” Bootzin was a beatnik and a hippie and a commune member and a vegetarian and a health-food salesman and a fitness expert long before those things were part of mainstream American culture. In essence, he seemed eccentric because he was right and in the minority. Here he is in the 1955 (at the 15:35 mark) amusing Groucho Marx on You Bet Your Life.

From his 2004 obituary in the San Diego Union-Tribune:Los Angeles – Gypsy Boots, a California fitness icon, author and health guru who paved the way for generations of beatniks, hippies and health-food junkies, has died at age 89.

Boots, born Robert Bootzin, died early Sunday at a convalescent home in Camarillo after a brief illness, said his son, Daniel Bootzin.

Born Aug. 19, 1915, in San Francisco to Jewish immigrant parents, Boots defined what it meant to live close to nature decades before the nation’s current obsession with organic foods, yoga and exercise.

During his life, he tried a number of careers, from author to entertainer to hay baler to trendy restaurateur – but never shed his long hair and thick beard or his passion for natural foods and a near-Spartan existence.

‘What people have a hard time understanding is that in the early 1960s, there were no hippies and nobody had long hair, nobody had a beard,’ said Daniel Bootzin. ‘He really was that way way before anybody had that look. As a child, I was painfully aware that he was extremely different than anybody else.'”

Tags: ,

I look askance at any article, like Bill Roberson’s new Digital Trends piece, which compares the course-altering effect of JFK’s Space Race pronouncement to Elon Musk’s push for electric cars. It’s overheated, but who knows, perhaps the latter will have a more profound influence on our environment. From the article, which also provides a historical look at the impact of automobiles:

“The Tesla is a bit like the Apollo moon landings. In truth, the lunar missions came before their time. We were supposed to orbit, build a space station platform, then head for new worlds. But President Kennedy’s space race with the Soviets lead the U.S. to leapfrog the Step 2 Space Station and throw for the end zone. Nice catch, NASA.

The Model S is making the electric car market do much the same thing. Logically, we should all be driving the offspring of the Toyota Prius and Honda Insight: cars with gas engines and electric motors mixed together for high mileage and unlimited range with no ‘anxiety.’ Hybrids, in all their forms, were supposed to be the bridge from gas to the all-electric future. But Mr. Musk changed the equation and now everyone is chasing the Model S, years ahead of schedule.

That the car is so tremendously good at this stage in its development cycle is a credit to Mr. Musk’s engineering prowess and his able employees. But years from now, history will show it shifted the proverbial paradigm just as the Model T did in the early 20th century.

Carmakers of all sizes are now scrambling to bring all-electric vehicles to market – all while the infrastructure to power them remains off the pace. Hopefully, Tesla’s Superchargers will light a fire under carmakers, politicians, city planners and transportation departments to get chargers in place to fuel the growing number of electric cars. Once the charging network hits critical mass – which is when EV owners can essentially drive anywhere and charge up quickly – electric car ownership numbers will carve heavily into those of gas-powered cars.

Eventually, it will be goodbye gasoline, at least for personal cars.”

Tags: ,

I love the Internet and the information it brings me, but I’m not on Facebook or Twitter and I don’t have a smartphone, so I’ve obviously said “no” to certain things. But will the things I’ve said “yes” be the same tomorrow? Will they be quietly remade by updating, constant updating? From “When Tech Turns Nouns Into Verbs,” Quentin Hardy’s New York Times blog post about a world in which the tools you use to measure also measure you, where things, simply put, change:

“We’re remaking the world so quickly that our language is breaking down.

Think about the phone you carry. You talk with people on it, but you can also open apps and transform it into a camera or chess board. As much as you talk on it, you use its Internet browser. In total daily usage, your phone is mostly pinging cellphone towers and Wi-Fi antennas, informing phone service providers, digital map makers and retailers of where you are.

Whatever this object is, it isn’t a phone in any conventional sense. And that may be a clue to a whole new way of thinking about the world around us.

The phone is a little connected computer — a device whose uses and meaning we continually explore and modify. It is by no means a phone in the historical sense. It is still a physical object, of course, but it is really a vehicle for one or another software-enabled experience. In an important sense, it is made to be contingent, changing with every download and update. That focus on the needs-driven experience means it behaves less like a static noun and more like an active verb.

This is becoming a commonplace across our connected world.”

Tags:

Even this early in the game, autonomous vehicles are probably as safe or safer than ones driven by humans. But the question is this: How much safer can they be? From Adam Fisher’s long-form PopSci look at Google’s fleet in beat mode:

“Right now, Chauffeur is undergoing what’s known in Silicon Valley as a closed beta test. In the language particular to Google, the researchers are ‘dogfooding’ the car—driving to work each morning in the same way that [Anthony] Levandowski does. It’s not so much a perk as it is a product test. Google needs to put the car in the hands of ordinary drivers in order to test the user experience. The company also wants to prove—in a statistical, actuarial sense—that the auto-drive function is safe: not perfect, not crash-proof, but safer than a competent human driver. ‘We have a saying here at Google,’ says Levandowski. ‘In God we trust—all others must bring data.’

Currently, the data reveal that so-called release versions of Chauffeur will, on average, travel 36,000 miles before making a mistake severe enough to require driver intervention. A mistake doesn’t mean a crash—it just means that Chauffeur misinterprets what it sees. For example, it might mistake a parked truck for a small building or a mailbox for a child standing by the side of the road. It’s scary, but it’s not the same thing as an accident.

The software also performs hundreds of diagnostic checks a second. Glitches occur about every 300 miles. This spring, Chris Urmson, the director of Google’s self-driving-car project, told a government audience in Washington, D.C., that the vast majority of those are nothing to worry about. ‘We’ve set the bar incredibly low,’ he says. For the errors worrisome enough to require human hands back on the wheel, Google’s crew of young testers have been trained in extreme driving techniques—including emergency braking, high-speed lane changes, and preventing and maneuvering through uncontrolled slides—just in case.

The best way to execute that robot- to-human hand-off remains an open question. How many seconds of warning should Chauffeur provide before giving back the controls? The driver would need a bit of time to gather situational awareness, to put down that coffee or phone, and refocus. ‘It could be 20 seconds; it could be 10 seconds,’ suggests Levandowski. The actual number, he says, will be ‘based on user studies and facts, as opposed to, ‘We couldn’t get it working and therefore decided to put a one-second [hand-off] time out there.’

So far, Chauffeur has a clean driving record. There has been only one reported accident that can conceivably be blamed on Google. A self-driving car near Google’s headquarters rear-ended another Prius with enough force to push it forward and impact another two cars, falling-dominoes style. The incident took place two years ago—the Stone Age, in the foreshortened timelines of software development—and, according to Google spokespeople, the car was not in self-driving mode at the time, so the accident wasn’t Chauffeur’s fault. It was due to ordinary human error.

Human drivers get into an accident of one sort or another an average of once every 500,000 miles in the U.S. Accidents that cause injuries are even rarer, occurring about once every 1.3 million miles. And a fatality? Every 90 million miles. Considering that the Google self-driving program has already clocked half a million miles, the argument could be made that Google Chauffeur is already as safe as the average human driver.”

Tags: ,

In his Ask Me Anything at Reddit, writer Junot Diaz was asked to recommend short-story collections. Here’s the exchange:

Question:

What are some short story collections you’d recommend to those people who are averse to reading short stories? Ones that would definitely change their mind about the genre.

Junot Diaz:

TE HOLT In the Valley of the Kings dennis johnson’s Jesus’ Son maxine hong kingston (memoir) Woman Warrior Edward P Jones Lost in the CIty Sandra Cisneros Woman Hollering Creek Sherman Alexie Lone Ranger and Tonto Fistfight in Heaven Octavia Butler’s BloodChild and Other Stories Ted Chiang Stories of Your Life.

Tags:

The idea of the “hot hand” in sports has long been derided as an antique of a more narrative-driven era, but could analytics have rescued the decidedly non-sabremetric idea from the dustbin? Perhaps. Some researchers now believe that basketball players who are shooting well see their percentage improve, if slightly, over a progression of shots. Still seems fishy to me. From “Biting the Hot Hand,” by Zach Lowe at Grantland:

“The same implication issue arises when we consider work by Jeremy Arkes, a professor at the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, who found over a giant sample size that players are about 3 percent more likely to hit their second free throw on a two-shot trip to the line if they also hit the first one. That’s fascinating, if it holds over multiple seasons. But how do coaches and players adjust to that kind of information?

Incorporating all this research is easier during timeouts, when a coach can design plays to minimize the chances of a bad heat check, as Henry Abbott has written before at TrueHoop.

Believing or not believing in the hot hand might change some things about the way a game flows, but even proponents of the hot hand’s existence claim it’s a relatively small effect that doesn’t emerge very often. And that’s part of the challenge in the data, even apart from trying to explain the factors that might lead a player into a better rhythm on a particular day. What is ‘hot,’ statistically? Making two in three shots? Eight in 12? How do we know when to start the streak and when to stop it? How many times do players really get ‘hot’ in a given season? Five? Ten? Two?

‘It’s very hard to define,’ Ezekowitz says.”•

_________________________

“Reggie Miller with a clutch trey”:

Tags:

Noted male impersonator Rosie Charles being sexually harassed.

 

Assad says he will give up his chemical weapons and you say...

Assad says he will give up his chemical weapons and you say…

How big is your strap-on? This big?

How big is your strap-on? This big?

I'm not telling you that.

I’m not telling you.

But it's bigger than this pen, right?

But it’s longer than this pen, right?

Do not ask me that.

I will not respond.

Does it hit you in the eye when you go jogging?

So big it hits you in the eye when you go jogging?

"I'm no great looker,"

“Hey, I’m no great looker.”

Please don’t be like the woman who rejected and hurt me

SWM 62. Are you sick and tired of playing the dating/courtship game that goes nowhere but to rejection, and then you have to start playing the game all over again from “start”?……..How about marriage instead of the same old dating games? How about marriage to a man who will REALLY!!!!!!!!!! appreciate you? To a man who will accept you as you are? To a sensitive, communicative, caring man who will be here for you?

I’m the best man you’ll read here, if you can realize that and you are an unmarried woman over 50 then don’t look for anyone else, answer this ad and if you are the first woman to claim me then you’ve got me and you will be claiming a man who will be everything good that you ever wanted in a mate.

I’d like to meet an older woman who has just one quality. That quality is that she knows how to say “I Do.” No, I don’t care about looks, figure, age or about any other stupidficial “quality” and if you are really, truly, seriously looking for a good man to marry then I suggest that you answer this ad because I may not be the looker who you are looking for but I’m the good, serious, communicative, intelligent, sincere man who happens to be what you need.

Please don’t be like the following who broke my heart…….Let’s just call her ‘brooklyn heights baby” (not her real neighborhood).

I met her a year ago today from a singles site, we went out a few times (and I thought that) we had fun. She was over 60, a few years older than me. We both were alone.

I treated her like a lady, respectful, equal, soft spoken and sensitive but I always do treat women this way.

I’m no great looker, as for her she was clumsy, gawky, a real sweet humanity in her face, voice, body language and I liked her and found her seeming humanity to look very attractive, I was interested and she claimed as well to be interested. We went out a few times, I took her to good restaurants, movies, paid for everything. 

A month and change later she calls me up out of nowhere and gives me the oldest cliche in the book (as if we were 15 years old or something: she gives me the thrown out/unthought about/totally insensitive “drop dead” cliche of “Oh, I’ve been thinking, you’re a REALLY nice guy and I don’t want to hurt you BUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

“We have nothing in common.”

(In other words, you aren’t good looking. Yep, I know the code words, we all recognize the code words. AS IF she didn’t enjoy the restaurants, the movies, the conversations.)

I was hurt, hurt bad by this shattering of a dream. I tried to reason with her but no, instead I should have hung up the phone the second that her cliche began because I knew what was coming and maybe it would have hurt a lot less if I hadn’t have talked to her…….she didn’t care how I felt, she just wanted to rid herself of an undesired suitor.

Now today I go back on the website and I see she’s still there and coming there actively (just like she has all year), she found nobody yet. Either she dumps everyone and or her ad has become one of the older familiar ones so its overlooked by now.

Her choice but IMHO she could have had a good year with a good man if her mind hadn’t been stuck in emotional adolecense waiting for some who knows, tall? handsome? macho? who never came her way this year or is it just that I’m too ugly? 

Hey, I’m no looker but I know that I’m satisfied with any woman that likes me and I’m too realistic to play kiddie looks games and capriciously say “Oh, you’re not my type so have a nice life.”

Are you wiser than she was? Then please claim this good heart that she so foolishly discarded and I will share a happier, better life with you than the miserable loneliness which to be honest, all three of us are going through right now.

“Are you wiser than she was?”

« Older entries § Newer entries »