Ron Paul

You are currently browsing articles tagged Ron Paul.

Ron Paul, who has frequently been elected President of straw, seems like a good idea to some college kids and many baristas. Sacha Baron Cohen’s bedroom guest just did an Ask Me Anything on Reddit. A few exchanges follow. 

________________________

Question:

How do you feel about Texas banning the sale of Tesla cars? Doesn’t seem very American or Libertarian.

Ron Paul

It’s un-American and it’s unpatriotic and it’s bad economic policy, and it should not be any business of the government what car you can buy.

________________________

Question:

Is there anything that Obama has done that you DO support?

Ron Paul:

That’s a narrow question. How long since it’s been since I’ve strongly supported what ANY president have done? Unfortunately our Presidents and our Congress have been systematically moving in the wrong direction. They have been undermining our freedoms and bankrupting our country and supporting perpetual war.

________________________

Question:

What are your thoughts on free migration? Do you think restrictions against immigration violate the non-aggression principle? Do you agree with economists who say that the World’s GDP would increase by magnitudes if you allowed free migration?

Ron Paul:

That might be the ideal to seek and it should be talked about and maybe someday we can reach that. That is essentially what our 13 Colonies set up under the Constitution – we could move back and forth as freely as possible, and it’s worked out rather well. The problem that we have today deals with the economy and the Welfare State. Because if the doors are wide open and you let all individuals in, all individuals suddenly qualify for welfare benefits – and you are looking for lots of problems. In a free society that is prosperous, the doors should be open as wide as possible. Even today we could do that if we could say “Come and work, come and play, but you don’t get automatic citizenship or benefits.” Those open doors would be very beneficial to us, but it’s been messed up because of the demagoguery and welfare state. But in an ideal world, there would be an economic benefit to it.

________________________

Question:

While I highly agree with many of your policies, can you give us an official response on your stance of separation of church and state?

Ron Paul:

Yes. The church should never run the state. They should never be synonymous. And the state should never interfere with the church. The responsibility of the government should be to protect the right to free choice, whether it is religion, philosophy, or our personal habits.

________________________

Question:

Dr. Paul, we have seen the expansion of Libertarianism over the past several years. How much of it do you think is enabled by the internet, and what are your thoughts on the recent, repeated attempts to limit the freedom of the net and our right to privacy? 

Ron Paul: 

Well that’s a great threat – the attack on the internet – because the internet is our best vehicle. It has been the best thing for us to have to spread our message. So it has been VERY instrumental in being able to get the message of Libertarianism out. The other thing that has helped us with this message is the evident failure now of our Keynesian economic system which we’ve had now for close to 100 years, and also the obvious evidence that our foreign policy is a complete failure and people are looking for answers, especially the young people, because they see it deeply flawed.

________________________

Question:

Why did you name your son Rand?

Ron Paul:

My wife had the children and she had the privilege of naming the children. Afterwards there was a little bit of discussing with her husband, namely me. 

But his name is not after Ayn Rand. His name is RANDALL despite some things that have been around on the Internet. He was called “Randy” at home, and he became “Rand” after becoming a physician.

••••••••••

“So tell me, who are you wearing?”:

Tags: ,

"He doesn’t go out of his way to convince Republicans that he is one of them." (Image by R. DeYoung.)

Ron Paul has made only slight concessions to the mainstream, pretending he wasn’t responsible for the racist, extremist newsletters that funded his national political career, but in the last five years or so, the center has moved quite a ways to meet him. Rigidly doctrinaire to the point of absurdity, Paul has somehow captured the hearts and minds of a reasonably sizable portion of the American public. But he’s a Libertarian, not a Republican any more than a Democrat, which makes him even more of an odd duck in the GOP field. He’s a third-party candidate running for one of the first two. But is he the beginning of a serious strain of post-party politics?

Some of you read the New Yorker before you read Afflictor (bastids!), so you may have already taken in Kelefa Sanneh’s smart piece about Paul this week. But in case you haven’t gotten to it yet, here’s an excerpt:

“‘I think parties are pretty irrelevant,’ Paul says, and he doesn’t go out of his way to convince Republicans that he is one of them. He firmly opposed Obama’s health-care plan, and he might win a few more votes if he made this opposition the centerpiece of his stump speech. Instead, he tends toward arguments that are almost perversely nonpartisan—elaborating, say, the similarities between Bush’s war on terror and Obama’s. He asks, ‘Have you ever noticed that we change parties sometimes, but the policies never change?’ Even during that first Tea Party appearance, in Texas in 2007, Paul passed up a chance to reassure Republican voters. Skipping over the ‘United Nations’ and ‘I.R.S.’ barrels, he picked up one marked ‘Iraq War’ and heaved it into the river. He was seventy-two at the time, and surely relished the physical act as much as the symbolic one. ‘Start with that, and then we can solve the rest of the problems,’ he said.”

••••••••••

Paul on Morton Downey, Jr.’s screamfest, 1988:

Tags: ,

Ron Paul: Even I'm not that crazy.

From ronpaul.com:

The outcry over the building of the mosque, near ground zero, implies that Islam alone was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. According to those who are condemning the building of the mosque, the nineteen suicide terrorists on 9/11 spoke for all Muslims. This is like blaming all Christians for the wars of aggression and occupation because some Christians supported the neo-conservatives’ aggressive wars.

The House Speaker is now treading on a slippery slope by demanding a Congressional investigation to find out just who is funding the mosque—a bold rejection of property rights, 1st Amendment rights, and the Rule of Law—in order to look tough against Islam.

This is all about hate and Islamaphobia.

We now have an epidemic of “sunshine patriots” on both the right and the left who are all for freedom, as long as there’s no controversy and nobody is offended.

Political demagoguery rules when truth and liberty are ignored.”

Tags: