From the BBC, a report about thousands of smart cars in Ann Arbor that communicate with one another even if the drivers don’t:

“If you want to find the smartest drivers in the world, you need to head for the home of the US car industry. Just outside Detroit, lies the town of Ann Arbor, Michigan. The drivers there are not any more intelligent than other parts of the world, despite it being a famed college town. However, their cars are.

That’s because the roads of Ann Arbor are now home to a fleet of several thousand cars that constantly ‘talk’ to one another. The scheme, known as the Safety Pilot Model Deployment project, offers a potential blueprint for the future of road transport. Like many projects it aims to cut congestion and make the road network more efficient. But this vision of the future is missing one thing: crashes.”

Declassified documents reveal that the Air Force worked stealthily on a flying saucer craft in the 1950s. From Sebastian Anthony at Extreme Tech:

“The aircraft, which had the code name Project 1794, was developed by the USAF and Avro Canada in the 1950s. One declassified memo, which seems to be the conclusion of initial research and prototyping, says that Project 1794 is a flying saucer capable of ;between Mach 3 and Mach 4,’ (2,300-3,000 mph) a service ceiling of over 100,000 feet (30,500m), and a range of around 1,000 nautical miles (1,150mi, 1850km).

As far as we can tell, the supersonic flying saucer would propel itself by rotating an outer disk at very high speed, taking advantage of the Coandă effect. Maneuvering would be accomplished by using small shutters on the edge of the disc (similar to ailerons on a winged aircraft). Power would be provided by jet turbines. According to the cutaway diagrams, the entire thing would even be capable of vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL).”

Tags:

Following up on yesterday’s post about biogerontologist Aubrey de Grey, an excerpt from “The Invincible Man,” a 2007 Washington Post profile by Joel Garreau of the scientist who believes we can conquer aging:

“At midday in George Washington University’s Kogan Plaza off H Street NW, you are surrounded by firm, young flesh. Muscular young men saunter by in sandals, T-shirts and cargo shorts. Young blond women sport clingy, sleeveless tops, oversize sunglasses and the astounding array of subtle variations available in flip-flops and painted toenails.

Is this the future? you ask de Grey.

‘Yes, it is precisely the future,’ he says. ‘Except without people who look as old as you and me.’

‘Of course the world will be completely different in all manner of ways,’ de Grey says of the next few decades. His speech is thick, fast and mellifluous, with a quality British accent.

‘If we want to hit the high points, number one is, there will not be any frail elderly people. Which means we won’t be spending all this unbelievable amount of money keeping all those frail elderly people alive for like one extra year the way we do at the moment. That money will be available to spend on important things like, well, obviously, providing the health care to keep us that way, but that won’t be anything like so expensive. Secondly, just doing the things we can’t afford now, giving people proper education and not just when they’re kids, but also proper adult education and retraining and so on.

‘Another thing that’s going to have to change completely is retirement. For the moment, when you retire, you retire forever. We’re sorry for old people because they’re going downhill. There will be no real moral or sociological requirement to do that. Sure, there is going to be a need for Social Security as a safety net just as there is now. But retirement will be a periodic thing. You’ll be a journalist for 40 years or whatever and then you’ll be sick of it and you’ll retire on your savings or on a state pension, depending on what the system is. So after 20 years, golf will have lost its novelty value, and you’ll want to do something else with your life. You’ll get more retraining and education, and go and be a rock star for 40 years, and then retire again and so on.’

The mind reels. Will we want to be married to the same person for a thousand years? Will we need religion anymore? Will the planet fill to overflowing?”

Tags: ,

My earliest childhood memory is of lying on the living room floor of my family’s home and trying to pick up Crayolas with my toes. I doubt there was a day in my life until recent years when I didn’t spend several hours holding a pen or pencil or marker (with my fingers, not toes). That’s what writers did. And there were unintended benefits: There seems to be a strong connection between penmanship and memory. Write a fact on a piece of paper and it’s much more likely you’ll recall that fact.

I can’t tell you the last time I held any writing utensil in my hand. Whether it’s doing a crossword puzzle or paying a bill or jotting down a note, a screen and keypad do the job. But I don’t fret over the change. Yes, memories and individuality are diminished in some ways in a paperless world, but I’ll accept the trade-off any day. Having crayons as a child was wonderful, but you know what else would have been great? Having access to the mountain of information that is accessible 24/7 to us all now. It’s a net win.

Not everyone agrees, however. In a Guardian essayPhilip Hensher urges the reclamation of penmanship. An excerpt:

“We have surrendered our handwriting for something more mechanical, less distinctively human, less telling about ourselves and less present in our moments of the highest happiness and the deepest emotion. Ink runs in our veins, and shows the world what we are like. The shaping of thought and written language by a pen, moved by a hand to register marks of ink on paper, has for centuries, millennia, been regarded as key to our existence as human beings. In the past, handwriting has been regarded as almost the most powerful sign of our individuality. In 1847, in an American case, a witness testified without hesitation that a signature was genuine, though he had not seen an example of the handwriting for 63 years: the court accepted his testimony.

Handwriting is what registers our individuality, and the mark which our culture has made on us. It has been seen as the unknowing key to our souls and our innermost nature. It has been regarded as a sign of our health as a society, of our intelligence, and as an object of simplicity, grace, fantasy and beauty in its own right. Yet at some point, the ordinary pleasures and dignity of handwriting are going to be replaced permanently.” (Thanks Browser.)

Tags:

“It’s kind of embarrassing to me.”

Husband Wants Me to do it….

We have not explained the “facts of life” to our young teenage son yet, and my husband says he can’t get involved in doing this. Says I must do it alone. How do I, a middle-aged mother talk to my 13 year old son about sex, masturbation, std’s, pregnancy, birth control, etc? It’s kind of embarrassing to me.

Serena

From Marek Kohn’s excellent Aeon essay about long-range planning, a passage about how the present might fall into ruin if we weren’t convinced of a future:

“How can you care about something you can’t imagine? For all but the most rigorous moral philosophers, caring requires more than a logical reckoning of duty. People need visions of things they feel attached to, or find beautiful, or moving. They have to be able to imagine a future the failure of which to materialise would feel like a loss. Points on the horizon that help people to see something in the far future may help them feel connected to it. They may also encourage people to believe that there actually will be a future.

After you have systematically cleared the horizon of time and it has faded to white, imagine what is likely to happen if you let someone else get their hands on your vacant landscape. Like as not, they will strew apocalypse all over it: ruins, mutants, scattered bands armed against each other. People seem irresistibly drawn to the end of the world — but if they catch glimpses of a future in which spiritual edifices or ancient documents endure, they might be more inclined to help secure it, and less inclined towards nihilistic fantasy.

They don’t have to have a view of the far horizon in order to factor the distant future’s interests into their actions. The interests of their children and grandchildren will be more alive in their minds: serving them may well serve those of more distant generations, too. But at this possibly critical moment, when our imaginative sympathies need all the help they can get, it’s worth trying to focus a 1,000-year stare.”

Tags:

If the apartment house I grew up in had a fire escape like the tube model displayed in this 1924 image taken by the Cheyenne River Agency, I may have become an arsonist just for the excuse to go for a spin. The record connected to it at the National Archives and Records Administration has only a simple description:

“Drops from second story of brick building; small child is sitting in the end of the tube.”

In a 1966 issue of Ramparts magazine, writer Howard Gossage tried to explain the teachings of Marshall McLuhan, whose book from two years earlier, Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man, had announced him as a media star with a message. An excerpt:

“McLuhan’s theory is that this is the first generation of the electronic age. He says they are different because the medium that controls their environment is not print — one thing at a time, one thing after another — as it has been for 500 years. It is television, which is everything happening at once, instantaneously, and enveloping.

A child who gets his environmental training on television— and very few nowadays do not — learns the same way any member of a pre-literate society learns: from the direct experience of his eyes and ears, without Gutenberg for a middle man. Of course they do learn how to read too, but it is a secondary discipline, not primary as it is with their elders. When it comes to shaping sensory perceptions, I’m afraid that Master Gutenberg just isn’t in the same class with General Sarnoff or Doctor Stanton.

Despite the uproar over inferior or inept television fare, McLuhan does not think that the program content of television has anything to do with the real changes TV has produced; no more than whether a book is trashy or a classic has anything to do with the process of reading it. The basic message of television is television itself, the process, just as the basic message of a book is print. As McLuhan says, ‘The medium is the message.’

This new view of our environment is much more realistic in the light of what has happened since the advent of McLuhan’s ‘Electric Age.’ The Gutenberg Age, which preceded it, was one thing after another in orderly sequence from cause to effect. It reached its finest flower with the development of mechanical linkages: A acts on B which acts on C which acts on D on down to the end of the line and the finished product. The whole process was thus fragmented into a series of functions, and for each function there was a specialist. This methodology was not confined to making things; it pervaded our entire economic and social system. It still does, though we are in an age when cause and effect are becoming so nearly simultaneous as to make obsolete all our accustomed notions of chronological sequence and mechanical linkage. With the dawn of the Electric Age, time and speed themselves have become of negligible importance; just flip the switch. Instant speed.

However, our methodology and thought patterns are still, for the most part, based on the old fragmentation and specialism, which may account for some of our society’s confusion, or perhaps a great deal of it.”

Tags: ,

Catskills maître d’hôtel Irving Cohen was a matchless matchmaker, and Margalit Fox of the New York Times is a dynamite writer. So it’s no surprise that the passing of the former turned into a great obituary in the care of the latter. An excerpt:

“By all accounts the borscht belt’s longest-serving maître d’hôtel, Mr. Cohen worked at the Concord, in Kiamesha Lake, N.Y., from his early 20s until he was in his early 80s. He would have worked there longer, he said, had the hotel not closed in 1998.

Officially, Mr. Cohen presided over three meals a day in the vast kosher empire that was the Concord dining room, helping thousands of patrons navigate its towering shoals of gefilte fish, pot roast, potato pudding and a great deal else.

Unofficially (though only just), he was the matchmaker for a horde of hopefuls, who flocked to the Catskills ostensibly for shuffleboard and Sammy Davis Jr. but in actuality to eat, drink, marry and be fruitful and multiply, generally in that order.

Thanks to Mr. Cohen, many did. In the 1940s, he paired the Concord’s original clientele. In the ’60s, he paired their children. And in the ’80s, he paired their children’s children. It is no exaggeration, Bob Cohen said Tuesday, to say that thousands of marriages resulted from his father’s sharp-eyed ministrations.

And thus, simply by doing his job — which combined Holmesian deductive skill with Postian etiquette and a touch of cryptographic cloak and dagger — Mr. Cohen single-handedly helped perpetuate a branch of American Jewry.”

Tags: ,

I’ve posted before about British gerontologist Aubrey de Grey, who brings a technologist’s approach to Ponce de León’s quest. (Thanks Next Big Future.)

From the July 9, 1875 Brooklyn Daily Eagle:

“An insane man was found wandering about the thoroughfare in the Twelfth Precinct yesterday evening by Officer Bedell who took him into custody. When in the station house he insisted upon lecturing the Sergeant upon the condition of his soul, and told him that he was ‘eternally damned.’ He said that his name was Jesus Christ, that he never had any other name, that he was born in Connecticut, was an Irishman, twenty-eight years old and a baker by trade. The Sergeant said the man was not ugly at all but decidedly crazy on religious matters.”

Tags:

SEALAB 1 was the U.S. Navy vessel created to conduct underwater exploration. In addition to doing deep-sea experiments, the psychological strain of isolation on humans was also investigated. Shaped like a ginormous dildo, the craft and its four crewmen were lowered into the waters off the coast of the Bahamas in 1964. Embedded is a short Navy doc about a voyage that would have delighted Jules Verne. Jackie Cooper hosts.

Tags:

“We are entranced with our emotions, which are so easily observed in others and ourselves.” (Image by Kantele.)

Times of great ignorance are petri dishes for all manner of ridiculous myths, but, as we’ve learned, so are times of great information. The more things can be explained, the more we want things beyond explanation. And maybe for some people, it’s a need rather than a want. The opening of “Music, Mind and Meaning,” Marvin Minsky’s 1981 Computer Music Journal essay:

“Why do we like music? Our culture immerses us in it for hours each day, and everyone knows how it touches our emotions, but few think of how music touches other kinds of thought. It is astonishing how little curiosity we have about so pervasive an ‘environmental’ influence. What might we discover if we were to study musical thinking?

Have we the tools for such work? Years ago, when science still feared meaning, the new field of research called ‘Artificial Intelligence’ started to supply new ideas about ‘representation of knowledge’ that I’ll use here. Are such ideas too alien for anything so subjective and irrational, aesthetic, and emotional as music? Not at all. I think the problems are the same and those distinctions wrongly drawn: only the surface of reason is rational. I don’t mean that understanding emotion is easy, only that understanding reason is probably harder. Our culture has a universal myth in which we see emotion as more complex and obscure than intellect. Indeed, emotion might be ‘deeper’ in some sense of prior evolution, but this need not make it harder to understand; in fact, I think today we actually know much more about emotion than about reason.

Certainly we know a bit about the obvious processes of reason–the ways we organize and represent ideas we get. But whence come those ideas that so conveniently fill these envelopes of order? A poverty of language shows how little this concerns us: we ‘get’ ideas; they ‘come’ to us; we are ‘re-minded of’ them. I think this shows that ideas come from processes obscured from us and with which our surface thoughts are almost uninvolved. Instead, we are entranced with our emotions, which are so easily observed in others and ourselves. Perhaps the myth persists because emotions, by their nature, draw attention, while the processes of reason (much more intricate and delicate) must be private and work best alone.

The old distinctions among emotion, reason, and aesthetics are like the earth, air, and fire of an ancient alchemy. We will need much better concepts than these for a working psychic chemistry.

Much of what we now know of the mind emerged in this century from other subjects once considered just as personal and inaccessible but which were explored, for example, by Freud in his work on adults’ dreams and jokes, and by Piaget in his work on children’s thought and play. Why did such work have to wait for modern times? Before that, children seemed too childish and humor much too humorous for science to take them seriously.

Why do we like music? We all are reluctant, with regard to music and art, to examine our sources of pleasure or strength. In part we fear success itself– we fear that understanding might spoil enjoyment. Rightly so: art often loses power when its psychological roots are exposed. No matter; when this happens we will go on, as always, to seek more robust illusions!”

Tags:

The problem with Supreme Court Justice Scalia goes even beyond his sad, pigheaded bigotry. His reasoning is also an embarrassment. He takes Constitutional Originalism to asinine extremes merely to attempt to justify his deep prejudice. His comments on gay marriage, via Salon:

“Homosexual sodomy? Come on. For 200 years, it was criminal in every state.”

Of course, in much of America slavery was allowed for more than 200 years. It’s sustained legality never made it less than disgraceful. 

Advocating America adhere to a moral code borne of an earlier, more benighted era is ugly, especially when it comes from someone in one of the nation’s most vital legislative positions.

Tags:

Technologists knew for the longest time that the world was going to be much more connected, that we would become a global hive. But what form would it take? Before Apple perfected ideas hatched at Xerox and brought them to the marketplace, a lot of people believed that television would be the medium that would unite us (with help from a phone connection, of course). TVs were already in every home, so even though it never came to pass, it made some sense.

From Bell Labs, a 1979 look at TVs and PCs connecting us:

“I am deathly afraid of fire escapes.”

help me life or death (bronx)

I am in desperate need of help right now of either money to get a lie detector test or if someone has the ability to give someone a lie detector test that would be better. I’m 60 years old and for almost a year have been mentally tortured, called fu….. thief on the street, spit at and more. I am NOT a thief, never stolen anything from anyone. My neighbor is spreading this lie through the whole neighborhood and I am shunned by people I’ve known for almost 20 years. I am a very private person and don’t hang out in peoples homes and no one hangs here. This thing that’s going on is ruining my life. I don’t go outside, don’t go anywhere. This issue is 6,000 thats a lot of money. She never called the cops only blamed me. There is much more to this story.I am desperate and it’s hard for me to ask anyone for any kind of help, but I need this to clear my name and then move. I am innocent. I don’t even know any of the facts concerning this except she left the money on a window sill on the fire escape I guess cause thats the only way anyone could have taken it. I am deathly afraid of fire escapes.

The opening of David Barash’s New York Times piece about how parasites can manipulate the behavior of their hosts, whether that host is a bee or a human:

“ZOMBIE bees?

That’s right: zombie bees. First reported in California in 2008, these stranger-than-fiction creatures have spread to North Dakota and, just recently, to my home in Washington State.

Of course, they’re not really zombies, although they act disquietingly like them, showing abnormal behavior like flying at night (almost unheard-of in healthy bees), moving erratically and then dying. These ‘zombees’ are victims of a parasitic fly, Apocephalus borealis. The fly lays eggs within honeybees, inducing their hosts to make a nocturnal ‘flight of the living dead,’ after which the larval flies emerge, having consumed the bee from the inside out.

These events, although bizarre, aren’t all that unusual in the animal world. Many fly and wasp species lay their eggs inside hosts. What is especially interesting, and a bit more unusual, is the way an internal parasite not only feeds on its host, but also frequently alters its behavior, in a way that favors the continued survival and reproduction of the parasite.

Not all internal parasites kill their hosts, of course: pretty much every multicellular animal is home to numerous fellow travelers, each of which has its own agenda, which in some cases involves influencing, or taking control of, part or all of the body in which they temporarily reside.”

Tags:

Braniff was fashion forward but not so progressive socially in the 1960s.

“Jones is likely to introduce one of his favorite pets to spoil your affability.”

A Wyoming man with a facility for snake charming was the subject of a profile in the Denver Post, which was reprinted in the November 28, 1897 Brooklyn Daily Eagle. An excerpt:

“Charles T. Jones, hunter, miner and prospector, is a well known character of Central Wyoming. A queer specimen of genius, endowed with the rare faculty of a snake charmer, whose psychic influence can subdue the vicious and deadly reptile whose namesake he bears, Rattlesnake Jones is one to be avoided during snake season. Whether riding along the highway or eating a quiet meal, Jones is likely at any moment to introduce one of his favorite pets to spoil your affability. He eats with them, sleeps with them, and they are his constant companions on his long journeys through the mountains.

While on a hunting expedition one season, Jones’ fondness for snakes compelled the entire party to vacate camp one morning before breakfast when every man in the outfit found a snake in his boot. The spasmodic gesticulations indulged in resembled a savage war dance. Not a man knew but every snake was a boa constrictor licking his chops for human gore, and no one had the curiosity to investigate at that particular moment. Being tenderfeet, they were unacquainted with Jones’ serpentine propensities, and order was not restored until he appeared on the scene, captured the snakes and conveyed them affectionately to his bosom, after which he proceeded to breakfast. Occasionally a viper protruded his ominous looking head from Jones’ shirt front or sleeve, to flash his long tongue in keen anticipation of a venison steak. It is needless to say Jones and his pets held high carnival that morning.

On another occasion Jones rode into a mining camp with fifteen rattlesnakes about him–with their fangs out, of course–but none less inviting in appearance. The presence of these unwelcome visitors created a panic among the miners, who were enjoying a half holiday and a keg of beer, and it was probably difficult to discriminate between the genuine snake and the product of Bacchus. 

Rattlesnake Jones is a man of medium height, with small gray eyes and wears long hair in true Western style. He invariably carries a six shooter and hunting knife and spends his life hunting and prospecting over the Rocky Mountains. He is very reserved and his extreme modesty is at once appreciated as a virtue rarely met with in old time celebrities who are inclined to be somewhat impressive in speaking of their past records. By dint of much persuasion, however, I induced Jones to tell me of his first experience in handling snakes.

“Before breakfast every man in the outfit found a snake in his boot.”

‘Well,’ he began, ‘I was always monkeying with something out of ordinary from the time I was a boy, and snakes were my earliest associates. But my first experience with the rattlers was in the Indian Territory in the early ’70s, while living among the Indians. I was then about 20 years of age. The different tribes were continually at war, either among themselves or combined against the whites. One day while out hunting with a small band of friendly Indians, a hostile party of three times our number surrounded us, killed all my companions and took me captive. Not knowing what my fate would be, I took chances to escape on the third night of my captivity. I made good speed till daylight, when I found a small cave near the head of a creek in which I crawled to hide till night came again. It was a very dark, filthy place and while endeavoring to make myself comfortable for the day I heard the warning hiss of a rattlesnake at my elbow. I immediately recoiled, but before I could get out of the way I was stung on the back of the neck. How to kill the poison was a question. I was not contortionist enough to suck it from the wound and knew not what to do. The country was full of hostile Indians. I endeavored to find a weed recommended for the cure of snake bite but it failed. All day the poison increased and by night my head was larger than a keg. Some time during the night I became delirious and nearly as I can calculate I did not regain my senses for twelve days.

When I became conscious I found myself naked as when I first came on Earth and I was almost buried in mud. In my delirium I had torn off all of my clothing and was without shoes even. The first thing that attracted my attention when I awoke was the rattle of a snake, weak as I was. We came out of that hole together somewhat ghostly looking but strong friends. In my nudity and accompanied by Mr. Snake, I overawed the Indians who regarded me in astonishment as being from the other world. My demands were granted with meek obedience, for which I owe a debt of gratitude never to be forgotten.’

Beside his love for rattlesnakes Jones has a fad for collecting curios. Mounted animals, horns, hides, tusks, etc., adorn his hermitage in promiscuous array.”

Tags: ,


Some search-engine keyphrases bringing traffic to Afflictor this week:

Afflictor: Fearing that Mitt Romney is eating one of Big Bird’s breasts.

When the bad man murdered me, it hurt so much.

  • Philip K. Dick was mentioned in the New Yorker just once during his lifetime.
  • In 1973, the Radical Left becomes taken with a teenage guru.
  • Elon Musk fires back at Mitt Romney and other critics of Tesla Motors.
  • Technology has toppled some businesses, aided others.
  • Venkat Rao updates the country mouse-city mouse tale for the Digital Age.
  • A brief note from 1901 about gargling.
  • A brief note from 1891 about an outhouse.

From the November 22, 1901 Brooklyn Daily Eagle:

Glen Cove, Long Island–Edward Albertson died yesterday from strangulation. He was ill with tonsillitis, and was gargling his throat when he choked, and, failing to get relief, was strangled to death. He leaves a widow and six children.”

Tags:

The great Gene Wilder is the star of what’s probably my third favorite film comedy, Young Frankenstein. (1. Kubrick’s Lolita, 2. Duck Soup.) Here’s Wilder in 1979 in a closed studio discussing his life and career with Merv Griffin.

Tags: ,

The best and brightest people I’ve met in my life haven’t been the most successful ones. America doesn’t work that way now. It probably never did, but it seems to be getting worse. What people believe to be a promise has become, at best, a lottery ticket.

I watched Carly Fiorina on TV the other day extolling Mitt Romney’s great command of facts and figures at the first Presidential debate. Like, say, his assertion that half of the clean tech companies that the President invested stimulus money in had gone belly up. Except that isn’t close to the truth. From what I can gather, more than 90% of those companies have thus far been successful. That’s an amazing rate. Far better than Romney’s record at Bain and far, far better than Fiorina’s lousy tenure at Hewlett-Packard. I’m all for inventors and creators and builders making good, but you have to question a system that so richly rewards an executive like Fiorina, who contributes little, or Romney, who doesn’t acknowledge he had a huge advantage in a very uneven playing field because of family money and connections. The disconnect between such people and most Americans is enormous.

Economist Joseph Stiglitz has been calling bullshit on the situation for some time now. From a recent Q&A with him at Spiegel

Spiegel: 

The US has always thought of itself as a land of opportunity where people can go from rags to riches. What has become of the American dream?

Stiglitz:

This belief is still powerful, but the American dream has become a myth. The life chances of a young US citizen are more dependent on the income and education of his parents than in any other advanced industrial country for which there is data. The belief in the American dream is reinforced by anecdotes, by dramatic examples of individuals who have made it from the bottom to the top — but what matters most are an individual’s life chances. The belief in the American dream is not supported by the data.

Spiegel: 

What do the numbers suggest?

Stiglitz:

There has been no improvement in well-being for the typical American family for 20 years. On the other side, the top one percent of the population gets 40 percent more in one week than the bottom fifth receive in a full year. In short, we have become a divided society. America has created a marvelous economic machine, but most of the benefits have gone to the top.”

Tags: , ,

“We are going to be living in a world with tablets or flat screen computers on the walls in our bedrooms and kitchens.” (Image by Vergel Bradford.)

Let’s hope there’s an OFF switch when we are surrounded by screens and sensors that want to assist us without any prompting. It will be wonderful and it will be terrible. From Ben Popper at the Verge:

It’s rare to meet a startup that is focused on building a business for a world which does not yet exist. But Expect Labs, which today announced a $2.4 million round of funding from Google Ventures and Greylock Partners, is doing just that. The company is creating a system that listens and understands human conversation, then suggests relevant information without being prompted. ‘As the price of hardware falls, we are going to be living in a world with tablets or flat screen computers on the walls in our bedrooms and kitchens,’ says Expect Labs founder Timothy Tuttle. ‘These machines are going to listen to everything you say and be able to assist you with the right song, map or recipe, without you even having to ask.'”

Tags: ,

« Older entries § Newer entries »