“He was obliged to shut the boy up or keep him chained, as he would eat all the eggs and chickens unless restrained.”

A growing boy with a healthy appetite was the focus of an article in the Detroit Tribune, which was republished in the September 1, 1871 Brooklyn Daily Eagle. An excerpt:

Johnson, Mich.–A great deal has been said in our local papers lately about the wonderful and unnatural appetite of the boy William Henry Forbes, now confined to the jail in this city, and to-day your reporter availed himself of the opportunity presented to witness an exhibition of the boy’s capacity. The feat, disgusting enough I assure you, was nothing less than the eating of a chicken raw.

Quite a crowd assembled in the jail barn to see the sight which was literally performed. A live chicken and a knife were placed in the boy’s hands when the revolting operation commenced. The chicken was laid on the floor and held down between the boy’s knees, while he sawed the head off with the knife. The boy then placed the bleeding neck in his mouth and deliberately sucked the warm blood from the body. He then began tearing the skin from the body, which proved quite a difficult task, at the same time, as a sort of pastime, chewing pieces of the skin which had been partly denuded of the feathers. Then beginning with one leg, the disgusting lunch began. I say lunch, for it was three o’clock in the afternoon, and the boy had already eaten three men’s rations for his dinner. After finishing both legs, he stopped long enough to remove the entrails, when he proceeded to finish the chicken. The fact of his eating the chicken in this way was no less surprising than his manner during the performance. He stood in the middle of the floor, apparently regardless of lookers on or their jokes, his whole attention seemingly engaged in what he was doing, and his inhuman meal was also eaten with evident relish. While eating the chicken, in reply to some questions he said he once swallowed a young duck alive, and no one doubted the statement after seeing him.

“He said he once swallowed a young duck alive.”

In conversation the boy seems quite intelligent. He is nearly 15 years old, but is not larger than a boy of 12, and has a hungry wolfish expression, which creates the impression that he has been starved at some period in his life. He was taken from the poorhouse about six years ago by Ira Gavitt, a farmer in the Township of Summit, and at that time ate no more than ordinary boys of his age. He was brought into notice by the arrest of Gavitt on complaint of his neighbor for abusing the boy. Gaviitt claims that he was obliged to shut the boy up or keep him chained, as he would eat all the eggs and chickens unless restrained. The boy will not say anything against Gavitt or his family.

The case is one well worthy of the attention of the medical fraternity. The boy was placed in jail on a charge of stealing, but really it was done to get him out of Gavitt’s hands. He really ought to be sent to the House of Corrections or the Reform School, where he can receive good medical attention, as there can be no doubt that his terrible appetite is a disease. He was asked if he could eat a baby, and he replied that he could if he should try. It is said that he attacked a boy on one occasion, telling him he must kill him to get his blood, for he must have blood.”

Tags: ,

Erika Anderson of Guernica interviewed Clive Thompson about his theory that early arcade games featured a type of information sharing that’s being used to greater good in our more interconnected world. The opening:

Guernica:

How would you describe the evolution of video games?

Clive Thompson:

When games started out, they were very, very simple affairs, and that was partly just technical—you couldn’t do very much. They had like 4K of memory. And so the games started off really not needing instructions at all. The first Pong game had one instruction. It was, ‘Avoid missing ball for high score.’ So it was literally just that: don’t fail to hit the ball. I remember when I read it, it was actually a confusing construction: avoid missing ball for high score. It’s weirdly phrased, as if it were being translated from Swedish or something, you know? But they didn’t know what they were doing.

But what started happening very early on was that if you were in the arcades as I was—I’m 44 in October, so I was right at that age when these games were coming out—the games were really quite hard in a way, and because they were taking a quarter from you, their goal was to have you stop playing quickly because they need more money. They ramped up in difficulty very quickly, like the next wave is harder, and the third wave is unbelievably harder. And so you had to learn how to play them by trial and error with yourself but you only had so much money. And so what you started doing was you started observing other people and you started talking to all the other people. What you saw when you went to a game was one person playing and a semi-circle of people around them and they were all talking about what was going on, to try to figure out how to play the game. And they would learn all sorts of interesting strategy.”

••••••••••

In 1972, Rod Serling teaches Steve Allen how to play the home version of Pong (forward to the 15:40 mark):

Tags: ,

I think of modern zoos as something far different from their sickening antecedents which displayed animals–even humans–in in awful conditions with no regard to the creatures. And they are far better–though that doesn’t mean the tension between our needs and the subject’s has disappeared. In his Aeon essay on the topic, Stephen Cave uses the death of a polar bear named Knut as a springboard. An excerpt:

“This is the paradox of the modern zoo: although they promise nature, they are necessarily unnatural. We visit them in search of the unpredictable, the vital — the sublime that cannot be found in the clockwork world we have built for ourselves. Yet they are made by humans, with all the artifice, technology and tools at our disposal. The lion and the zebra in the zoo will never meet in mortal struggle as they do daily on the Serengeti, but instead each is carefully contained, their needs met by plans, plumbing, and delivery vans.

Zoos have redefined their mission since the days of the menagerie, when people were content to show animals as spectacles and subjugates. Today, keeping wild animals behind bars demands justification beyond amazing or amusing us, and this is made on three grounds: research, education, and conservation. Each of these depends upon an idea of nature out there, beyond the city limits — a nature to be researched and understood; a nature about which we can and should be educated; and a nature that zoos want to help us conserve.”

Tags:

ToyTalk has raised a boatload of capital in anticipation of its forthcoming “intelligent” teddy bear. It will make your child’s current favorite doll seem unclean and illiterate. (Thanks Singularity Hub.)

I always think people behave insanely, but then I recall casual conversations I’ve had with pharmaceutical-industry employees. So many of us are on prescription medicines, especially Oxycodone and Vicodin and other painkillers. More than we might suppose. Then I’m surprised that we don’t act even more off-the-wall. Have we silently become the walking dead, or does the impulse to dose, despite the short-term ramifications, augur well for the future of human enhancement? The opening of “Is Drug Addiction Part of Human Evolution?” Sasha Wolfe’s h+ essay about the hidden meaning of the dosages we consume:

“The human mind may be a wondrous and expansive thing that is constantly learning and adapting itself to the changing universe that surrounds us. Nonetheless human beings have a habit of becoming unsatisfied with our surroundings. Dealing with mental anguish and boredom has always been one of our greatest challenges as a species. To meet these challenges many of us have resorted to the use of recreational drugs in an effort to either expand our minds, embrace new experiences or simply to nullify the pain that life has inflicted upon us. Since the time of the ancient Egyptians mankind has sought out, cultivated and harvested a wide variety of recreational drugs to satisfy our cravings, alleviate our shortcomings and nullify our insecurities. The more advanced we evolve as a species the more sophisticated and widespread our involvement in the drug culture. But if we are to believe the teachings of Darwin about evolution, the strongest of the species will always thrive and dominate over the weaker of the species. Hence, given the proliferation of drug use with the technological advancement of our society, we must ask ourselves some fundamental questions. Is the use of recreational drugs just part of the human condition, and to that end is drug addiction actually part of our natural evolution as a species?”

Tags:

Reddit has a new Ask Me Anything with Stanley Kubrick’s daughter Katharina and grandson Joe. If you read the blog regularly, you probably know I’m a little obsessed with Kubrick, whom I rate above all other filmmakers, even Wilder, Buñuel and Godard. A few exchanges with Katharina follow.

________________________

Question:

Katharina, I don’t know how old you are, so I’m not sure if this is relevant or not. But what was your father like during filming as opposed in between films? Did he seem more stressed, or did he ever complain about so and so not being able to nail a take? Or was he pretty much always the same at home?

Also, any cool stories of you being on set with him or anything like that?

Katharina:

I’m nearly 59. Between films he did a lot of reading, caught up with viewing the videos of American football games that his sister used to send him. He was always working on improving print qualities, hiring directors to shoot the voice overs for films that had to be dubbed and checking on how his films were doing in other parts of the world. He never stopped tending his babies even once they were out in the world.

________________________

Question:

What were Stanley’s favorite movies? (Aside from his own) 

Katharina:

He loved films. He admired the work of Bergman, Tarkovsky, Bunuel, Spike Lee, Speilberg, the list is long and varied.

Question:

I love the idea of Stanley Kubrick watching Do the Right Thing or She’s Gotta Have It. 

Katharina:

He liked White Men Can’t Jump. It was on TV and I asked him if I should watch it, and he said, “yeah that’s a good movie, you’ll enjoy it.”

________________________

Question: 

What are your favorite memories of Stanley? What was he like around the house?

Katharina:

He was just a Dad who liked making tuna sandwiches and watching sport on TV. He was always working, and we learned a lot being around him.

••••••••••

Two recent Kubrick posts:

Tags:

From the May 23, 1884 Brooklyn Daily Eagle:

Galveston, Tex.–A dispatch from Vernon, Tex., says: ‘A cowboy rode into a ranch near here yesterday and without any warning shot three times into the beds occupied by his comrades, killing one instantly, while another died within a few hours after. He claims the shooting was accidental. The coroner is now making an investigation. He will probably be lynched.'”

“We will probably be drinking.”

Experienced Dungeon Master – $15 (Williamsburg)

Hello,

Me and about 4-5 of my 24-27 year old friends have decided to try Dungeons and Dragons. We have never played before or even seen the game played. We have some idea of how the game should be played but need an experienced DM to lead us through our first game.

A DM that has all the required equipment would be nice, as we have nothing. A DM that could answer our questions about D&D would be great as well (i.e. whats the difference between D&D3.5 and 4.0?)

Also: the DM should be patient and have a thick-skin, we will probably be drinking, laughing, teasing eachother and may not be 100% focused on playing D&D the “traditional” way (i.e. there is a solid chance that a player may want to take unusual actions such as “ram a beer” or “slap that other player in the face”), so we would appreciate a DM with a sense of humor.

I would love to have a phone conversation with a potential DM to understand what we need to do before game-day as well as ask some questions.

Compensation will be somewhere between $10-$15 an hour and includes free pizza and beer or some other form of food/libation. If you feel strongly that you deserve higher compensation, I would be happy to hear you out.

Slavoj Žižek, briilliant and buffoonish, offers a tour of his humble abode. The kitchen, in particular, is special. (Thanks Biblioklept.)

Tags:

Gore Vidal regularly diminished other writers-often really talented ones–as a means of elevating himself. It’s an immature and cheap way of making yourself seem superior. (It’s the same thing that Chevy Chase, that miserable prick, does with fellow comedians). In a 2006 interview conducted by Jon Wiener that’s published at Los Angeles Review of Books, Vidal used this tactic on Truman Capote and Thomas Pynchon, two writers who were his betters and who turned out works that will outlast anything he did. Not even close. An excerpt:

“Jon Wiener: 

One of the things they do at community colleges is teach writing. I think there are programs everywhere now. At my school, U.C. Irvine, we have an undergraduate major called ‘Literary Journalism.’ It started only a couple of years ago, but it already has over 200 majors, and if there are 200 at Irvine, there is a similar number at a hundred other schools. This means hundreds of thousands of students are studying to be writers. What do you make of this?

Gore Vidal: 

We have Truman Capote to thank for that. As bad writers go, he took the cake. So bad was he, you know, he created a whole new art form: the nonfiction novel. He had never heard of a tautology, he had never heard of a contradiction. His social life was busy. To have classes in fiction — that really is hopeful, isn’t it. People can go to school and bring in physics. The genius of Thomas Pynchon’s Gravity’s Rainbow: he had to take all of his first year courses at, what was it, Cornell? One of his teachers was Nabokov. And everything he had in his first year’s physics went in to Gravity’s Rainbow. Whether it fit in or not, it just went in there. That’s one way of doing it.”

Tags: , , ,

Bobby Jindal: Dumber than a box of hammers. (Image by Gage Skidmore.)

Watching the GOP sift through the wreckage of election night is a case study in selective amnesia. Karl Rove, whose party aggressively tried to suppress minority votes, accuses President Obama of voter suppression for running successful political ads. Joe Scarborough, a member of the delusional conservative media, is angry at the delusional conservative media. Stunningly, Newt Gingrich is one of the very few to show utter humility. Amazements never cease.

Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal has gotten into the act, encouraging the Republican Party to stop being “stupid.” But this posture doesn’t cohere with some of his own positions as a creationist and supporter of intelligent design. Three excerpts follow.

From Politico: “‘It is no secret we had a number of Republicans damage our brand this year with offensive, bizarre comments — enough of that,’ Jindal said. ‘It’s not going to be the last time anyone says something stupid within our party, but it can’t be tolerated within our party. We’ve also had enough of this dumbed-down conservatism. We need to stop being simplistic, we need to trust the intelligence of the American people and we need to stop insulting the intelligence of the voters.'”

From Slate, 2012: “Jindal has an elite résumé. He was a biology major at my school, Brown University, and a Rhodes scholar. He knows the science, or at least he ought to. But in his rise to prominence in Louisiana, he made a bargain with the religious right and compromised science and science education for the children of his state. In fact, Jindal’s actions at one point persuaded leading scientific organizations, including the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology, to cross New Orleans off their list of future meeting sites.”

From the New Orleans Times-Picayune, 2012: “Vouchers are supposed to rescue students from underperforming public schools and give them access to superior instruction. That will not always happen, it being the height of naivete to assume that private schools are necessarily better. But, thanks to Zack Kopplin, we know for certain that at least 19 of the schools receiving a public subsidy will deliver precisely the opposite of the advertised effect. Their graduates will be treated by employers and college administrators as pariahs.

That vouchers have led to this is hardly surprising. They are Gov. Bobby Jindal’s educational panacea, and he has always supported creationism.”

JC: Don’t take everything so literally, people.

Tags:

I’ve always assumed there’s been a connection between my lack of musical ability and difficulty learning foreign languages–I just don’t have the ear for it. Joshua Foer, who is obsessed with memory, claims to not be very good at languages, either. Yet he was able to converse in an obscure tongue after a very short course of study thanks to a particular method of mnemonics. From his new article in the Guardian:

“I have never been particularly good with languages. Despite a dozen years of Hebrew school and a lifetime of praying in the language, I’m ashamed to admit that I still can’t read an Israeli newspaper. Besides English, the only language I speak with any degree of fluency is Spanish, and that came only after five years of intense classroom study and more than half a dozen trips to Latin America. Still, I was determined to master Lingala before leaving for the Congo. And I had just under two and a half months to do it. When I asked Ed if he thought it would be possible to learn an entire language in such a minuscule amount of time using Memrise, his response was matter-of-fact: ‘It’ll be a cinch.’

Memrise takes advantage of a couple of basic, well-established principles. The first is what’s known as elaborative encoding. The more context and meaning you can attach to a piece of information, the likelier it is that you’ll be able to fish it out of your memory at some point in the future. And the more effort you put into creating the memory, the more durable it will be. One of the best ways to elaborate a memory is to try visually to imagine it in your mind’s eye. If you can link the sound of a word to a picture representing its meaning, it’ll be far more memorable than simply learning the word by rote.” (Thanks Browser.)

Tags:

Merv Griffin interviews John le Carré in 1965, during the frost of the Cold War.

Tags: ,

Auguste Rodin, 1893, the year his art caused controversy and failed to sell at Chicago’s World Fair.

On Auguste Rodin’s 172nd birthday, I present to you this classic photograph of the sculptor, which was taken in 1893 by Felix Nadar. By this point, The Thinker was complete and the artist’s reputation secure. Rodin died 24 years after this picture was taken at age 77. In 1923, Rodin’s secretary published a book alleging that the great artist died from a lack of heat in his home, his friends and nation having turned their backs on him. In its first month of existence in March of 1923, Time magazine ran an article (subscription only) about the controversy. An excerpt:

“Paris has been deeply shocked by a report of the circumstances of the death of the great Impressionist sculptor, Auguste Rodin.

A book by Mile. Tirel, Rodin’s secretary, states definitely that Rodin died of cold, neglected by friends and officials of the state, while his sculptures, which he had given to the nation, were kept warmly housed in a centrally heated museum at public expense. His case was so desperate that he asked to be permitted to have a room in the museum—the Hotel Biron, formerly his own studio. The official in charge of the museum refused. Other officials and friends promised coal but never sent it, though his situation at Meudon, ill, and freezing to death, was apparently well known to all of them.

No one in a position to know the facts has denied Mile. Tirel’s charges. The book has the sanction of Rodin’s son.”

•••••••••

Rodin, through Sacha’s Guitry’s eyes:

Tags:

“Obama invoked average Americans living out this ethos of mutual responsibility.” (Image by David Shankbone.)

Where are the “job creators” right now? Probably eating freedom fries. As the language of manipulation has been drowned out by machines crunching raw data, it’s good to remember that some people in addition to Nate Silver were calling bullshit on the GOP narratives leading up to Election Day. One was New York magazine’s Jonathan Chait, who called out the wishful thinking being sold in earnest daily by Joe Scarborough and others. (It’s very amusing that Scarborough is now angrily calling out the lies of the conservative media, considering he was a big part of the problem.) Chait’s well-tuned ears also caught the gist of Obama’s victory speech which  might have been lost in the wee hours of the morning. From his new article, “We Just Had a Class War: And One Side Won“:

“Obama then proceeded to define the American idea in a way that excludes the makers-versus-takers conception of individual responsibility propounded by Paul Ryan and the tea party. Since Obama took office, angry men in Colonial garb or on Fox News have harped on ‘American exceptionalism,’ which boils our national virtue down to the freedom from having to subsidize some other sap’s health insurance. Obama turned this on its head. ‘What makes America exceptional,’ he announced, ‘are the bonds that hold together the most diverse nation on Earth. The belief that our destiny is shared; that this country only works when we accept certain obligations to one another and to future generations.’ Obama invoked average Americans living out this ethos of mutual responsibility (such as a ‘family business whose owners would rather cut their own pay than lay off their neighbors,’ the example of which stands at odds with the corporate ethos of a certain ­Boston-based private-equity executive). And even the line about red states and blue states began with the following statement: ‘We are greater than the sum of our individual ambitions.’

Presumably more was at work here than mere uplift. The president was establishing the meaning of his victory.”

Tags: , ,

Via Clay Dillow at PopSci, a report about the development of artificial human skin that repairs itself at room temperature:

“Before we can construct the realistic humanoid robots that populate our most vivid sci-fi-driven dreams, there are a lot of human systems that researchers are going to have to emulate synthetically. Not the least challenging is human skin; filled with nerve endings and able to heal itself over time, our skin serves as both a massive sensory system and a barrier between our innards and the outside world. Now, an interdisciplinary team of Stanford researchers has created the first synthetic material that is both self-healing at room temperature and sensitive to touch–a breakthrough that could be the beginnings of a new kind of robot skin (and in the meantime enjoy much more practical applications like enhanced prosthetics).”

Tags:

Unedited footage of a 1981 audience Q&A session with Orson Welles, who discussed The Trial. His Kafka adaption has amazing set design and cinematography, but it still feels sort of hollow to me.

Tags:

The opening of “Will Robots Inherit the Earth?Marvin Minsky’s 1994 Scientific American article about the end of carbon’s dominance:

“Everyone wants wisdom and wealth. Nevertheless, our health often gives out before we achieve them. To lengthen our lives, and improve our minds, in the future we will need to change our bodies and brains. To that end, we first must consider how normal Darwinian evolution brought us to where we are. Then we must imagine ways in which future replacements for worn body parts might solve most problems of failing health. We must then invent strategies to augment our brains and gain greater wisdom. Eventually we will entirely replace our brains — using nanotechnology. Once delivered from the limitations of biology, we will be able to decide the length of our lives–with the option of immortality — and choose among other, unimagined capabilities as well.

In such a future, attaining wealth will not be a problem; the trouble will be in controlling it. Obviously, such changes are difficult to envision, and many thinkers still argue that these advances are impossible–particularly in the domain of artificial intelligence. But the sciences needed to enact this transition are already in the making, and it is time to consider what this new world will be like.

Such a future cannot be realized through biology.”

Tags:

From the August 22, 1893 Brooklyn Daily Eagle:

“Officer Madigan of the Myrtle Avenue court squad had an exciting  time yesterday afternoon when he went out to the piggery district, on the the boundary of Flatbudh, to secure Annie Wilson, 10 years old, whom, it was claimed by the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, was not properly cared for by her grandmother, Mrs. Mary Cursel, with whom she was living. When the officer started with Annie from the hovel a mob of twenty or thirty women threw stones at him and tried to rescue the child. He took her safely, however, to the society’s office and in court this mornings he was sent to St. Joseph’s Home.”

Tags: , ,

“You can see were the Alaskan women actually sewed together the pieces of dried seal skin.”

Seal Coat for sell (Rock Hill, SC)

Hi this beautiful coat was given to me by one of my patients. She gave me history on the coat and states that her husband had it hand made as a wedding gift to her but he never made it back from the war. Due to it bringing memories she decided to give it to me one day she came into the office.The coat is so, OMG, beautiful. As I explained it was hand made there you can see were the Alaskan women actually sewed together the pieces of dried seal skin. You can see layered patches sewen together. The coat is very thick or shall I say weigh a lot. You can’t but help adore it.

The little I have learned is that it was made in Alaska or cold country. I can take tons of photos but only if someone is really honestly interested in seeing the coat. I reside in SC and it does not get cold enough here to wear such a rich vintage item.Few things you should know: Since it was hand made, it is sized approximately to a 12/14 because this is my size and it fits perfectly. It has some inner flaws where threads may have unraveled.

Most important. I took the coat to Montaldo, Douglas Furs in Charlotte, NC. They confirmed that the coat is authenic seal and they couldn’t get over the look of it.

But because of some “right activist law” the only thing they could do is prove authenicity but not able to give me a quote on the coat. ‘Yes it is worth something’ the young man and lady said, but we are unable to share a quote because of the law of NC and the activist law.

They hurried to tell me to perhaps place it on EBAY or here. I placed it on EBAY but it was rejected due to the same law, but as he says, the coat is truely a valuable asset to ones closet.
I was keeping the coat at a local cleaners but I felt I was spending to much monies. Help me to find this beautiful coat a home. He did say it does have unquotable value.

He said even with the coat holding value some altering will definitely have to be done but what a gift someone would be getting.

  • Cosmetics: Long before bioengineering allowed us to look exactly as we wished, people used to approximate beauty by crudely drawing on their faces with colored sticks and brushes. It was considered attractive even though now it horrifies us. More women did this than men because in their benighted societies females were judged more heavily on their looks. There were people who did this professionally, paid to try to cover up the hideousness of these primitive, imperfect people. Everybody pretended to not notice how phony it looked. Or perhaps they were too unintelligent to be aware.

See also:

A 1980 episode of a post-ABC Dick Cavett talk show, in which he interviews Laurence Olivier and Joan Plowright in their suite at the Wyndham Hotel. Crappy video quality, but obviously worth it.

Tags: , ,

President Obama: Math is helpful.

  • If you are a Presidential candidate who does not have a TON of small donors, you are in trouble. Super PACS can provide a lot of organizational money, but citizens who give even $5 to a candidate are emotionally invested in the campaign and likely to turn out on Election Day. A top-heavy campaign is unlikely to succeed.
  • During the latter days of the election, even respected and sane pundits like Chuck Todd were sure that there was a huge enthusiasm gap that favored the GOP, that Romney’s supporters were much more likely to show up at the voting booth on November 6. I don’t have access to all the numbers Todd and others do, but I don’t doubt that they were reading the information correctly. Why, then, was the outcome contrary to this info? I think that no matter what people tell you during a phone survey, those excited about their own candidate are much more likely to turn out than those who don’t like the other party’s choice. Most times, we are voting for, not against.
  • No one again is getting elected to the Oval Office (in part) because Peggy Noonan wrote just the right nursery rhyme or Newt or Karl came up with the perfect bullshit phrase, not in this post-verbal, data-rich society. But no one should think that data mining is just another way to manipulate the citizenry. Data can’t control anything, not when every voter is potentially a fact-checker, when the media has become so diffuse. It can only let you know where your strengths are, what the best paths to take are. Data is vital, but it can only maximize your candidate, not make him or her.•


Some search-engine keyphrases bringing traffic to Afflictor this week:

Afflictor: Thinking that this was an election in which the PAC man…

…wasn’t able to beat the pizza man.

  • A brief note from 1866 about a newborn.

« Older entries § Newer entries »