Urban Studies

You are currently browsing the archive for the Urban Studies category.

From the August 1, 1885 Brooklyn Daily Eagle:

Laredo, Tex.–The 7 year old son of a well to do Mexican is dying a horrible death from a very unusual cause. A few days ago that little fellow had a slight attack of bleeding at the nose and lay down to sleep without removing the blood. While asleep a large green fly deposited its eggs in the bloody nostril. Physicians have extracted over fifty worms, about half an inch long, and have detected evidences of many others eating toward the brain. They say the child will die.”

A 1978 film about the early efforts to popularize solar energy in America, which encountered problems of economics and lack of political will. Hosted by Eddie Albert, who apparently was not Buddy Ebsen.

Tags:

“Bada-bing.”

From “Cyber-Neologoliferation,” James Gleick’s fun 2006 New York Times Magazine article about his visit to the offices of the Oxford English Dictionary, an explanation of how the word “bada-bing” came to be listed in the OED:

“Still, a new word as of September is bada-bing: American slang ‘suggesting something happening suddenly, emphatically, or easily and predictably.’ The Sopranos gets no credit. The historical citations begin with a 1965 audio recording of a comedy routine by Pat Cooper and continue with newspaper clippings, a television news transcript and a line of dialogue from the first Godfather movie: ‘You’ve gotta get up close like this and bada-bing! you blow their brains all over your nice Ivy League suit.’ The lexicographers also provide an etymology, a characteristically exquisite piece of guesswork: ‘Origin uncertain. Perh. imitative of the sound of a drum roll and cymbal clash…. Perh. cf. Italian bada bene mark well.’ But is bada-bing really an official part of the English language? What makes it a word? I can’t help wondering, when it comes down to it, isn’t bada-bing (also badda-bing, badda badda bing, badabing, badaboom) just a noise? ‘I dare say the thought occurs to editors from time to time,’ Simpson says. ‘But from a lexicographical point of view, we’re interested in the conventionalized representation of strings that carry meaning. Why, for example, do we say Wow! rather than some other string of letters? Or Zap! Researching these takes us into interesting areas of comic-magazine and radio-TV-film history and other related historical fields. And it often turns out that they became institutionalized far earlier than people nowadays may think.'”

Tags: ,

When I first became conscious of sports as a child, I was obsessed with boxing. But I was still a kid when Muhammad Ali lost his amazing speaking ability, and I never could watch it again. Ali was very important to me not only as an athlete but for his politics. It isn’t giving him enough credit in and of himself to say that he was for me a gateway drug to Malcolm X, but there’s a lot of truth to that statement. In fact, studying boxing matches that took place long before my birth taught me so much about history and race and politics and sociology. The sport had the same effect on millions of others. Boxing was king until it wasn’t. The shadiness of the promoters had something to do with its decline, but mostly it was watching these beloved figures grow shaky in their hands and voices.

Rich Cohen has an article in the New Republic about football’s future being threatened by the growing awareness of the sport’s unavoidable head injuries. It seems inconceivable that football could severely decline because of the cash cow that the NFL is, but, then again, no one is building insta-stadiums to handle overflowing boxing crowds anymore. An excerpt:

“The worry is not just that people will stop watching the game—it’s that parents will stop letting their kids play, starving the league of talent. Speaking on The Tonight Show, Terry Bradshaw, the great Steelers quarterback, predicted the demise of football, saying if he had a son, he would not let him sign up. ‘The fear of them getting these head injuries,’ he explained, ‘it’s just too great for me.’ Something similar happened to boxing, which was once the biggest sport in the United States. But the country evolved away from the ring, until boxing became a mirror of its own saddest character, the nobody, the palooka, the bum.”

Tags:

“They attempted to force liquor down his throat, and slapped and kicked him.”

As I understand it from this 19th-century article from the Big Timber Express (which was republished in the March 11, 1896 Brooklyn Daily Eagle), a bunch of nice fellas in a Montana town bought a round of drinks for a local newspaperman and no one appreciated the kindly gesture. An excerpt:

“Occasionally an Eastern newspaper voices the general impressions of the people of the country where it circulates concerning social conditions in far Western states. Lynching, murders, highway robbery, untamed cowboys and heroes of the Deadwood Dick type are represented as the striking elements in the average Western town, and one would think to read the stuff, that every other Western citizen is a ruffian and a cutthroat, and that the only semblance of law and order is maintained by the constant intimidation of the sheriff’s pistol and a few scattered churches. Of course such articles only betray the ignorance of their authors to those who have been West, but it must be admitted that a measure of justification is found for them in such experiences as George H. Scott, of the Rocky Mountain Husbandman had at Perry (formerly Joliet), Montana, a week or two ago.

Mr. Scott is a gentleman who is opposed on  principle to the use of intoxicating liquors, and when the prominent ruffians of Perry invited him to drink with them, he very properly but civilly declined, whereupon they attempted to force liquor down his throat, and afterward slapped and kicked him. When it is remembered that Mr. Scott is an invalid, the brutality of the drunken scoundrels is horrible, and if it be a fact as stated, that some of the most prominent business men of the place participated in the outrage, the town should be at once quarantined, and missionaries backed by a military force, sent in to effect the civilization of the Perry barbarians. Perry is as much a disgrace to Montana as it would be to as Eastern state, and decent people will do well to avoid the town as they would a plague district, until it proves itself possessed of some of the elements of civilization and self respect.”

Tags:

“Urine or piss.”

Healthy Male Urine/Piss Sample Specimen – $30 (Nassau)

Do you need a urine or piss sample for your own personal testing? I’m a healthy male guranteed. If you come to me it is the price listed and if I have to come to you it is more depending on the distance. Do what you will with the sample. Just email me your number and I will get back to you very shortly I check my email every hour just in case you need one ASAP.

From Kevin Kelly’s 1994 book, Out of Control: The New Biology of Machines, Social Systems, and the Economic World, which examined, among other things, how hive behavior in insects might be replicated in humans connected by technology:

“Ants, too, have hive mind. A colony of ants on the move from one nest site to another exhibits the Kafkaesque underside of emergent control. As hordes of ants break camp and head west, hauling eggs, larva, pupae — the crown jewels — in their beaks, other ants of the same colony, patriotic workers, are hauling the trove east again just as fast, while still other workers, perhaps acknowledging conflicting messages, are running one direction and back again completely empty-handed. A typical day at the office. Yet, the ant colony moves. Without any visible decision making at a higher level, it chooses a new nest site, signals workers to begin building, and governs itself.

The marvel of ‘hive mind’ is that no one is in control, and yet an invisible hand governs, a hand that emerges from very dumb members. The marvel is that more is different. To generate a colony organism from a bug organism requires only that the bugs be multiplied so that there are many, many more of them, and that they communicate with each other. At some stage the level of complexity reaches a point where new categories like ‘colony’ can emerge from simple categories of ‘bug.’ Colony is inherent in bugness, implies this marvel. Thus, there is nothing to be found in a beehive that is not submerged in a bee. And yet you can search a bee forever with cyclotron and fluoroscope, and you will never find the hive.”

Tags:

The early promise of PCs in the 1970s, in the heyday of the Homebrew Computer Club, was that the individual would be master of the technology, not that we would queue up for “improved” iPhones handed down to us by a gigantic corporation every six months. Chris Anderson thinks the spirit of the Homebrew is regaining prominence and will be the future of American manufacturing. From Farhad Manjoo in Slate:

“As Anderson describes it, the new movement is built on three technological and social advances. First, there’s ‘rapid prototyping.’ Today you can design your world-changing widget on a computer, instantly make it real on a 3-D printer, and then go back to the drawing board to refine it. Second, because your designs are all standard CAD files, you can share them with others and borrow other people’s designs, allowing for everyone to improve their widgets through remixing. Finally, when you’ve perfected your widget, you can take advantage of firms like Kickstarter to raise money, then send your designs to commercial manufacturers that will produce your widget in bulk—even if bulk, for you, means you’re making only a few thousand of them.

When I chatted with Anderson recently, I asked him about the timeline of his vision. He thinks the maker movement is around where the PC industry was in the mid-1980s—somewhere between the release of the Apple II and the Mac, between a computer that was popular with hobbyists and one that was meant for everyone. Soon, we’ll have 3-D printers that cost about the same as paper printers, we’ll have 3-D design software that’s as easy to use as iMovie, and making physical things will take on the kind of cultural significance that making digital things did in the first dot-com boom. At that point, we’ll notice the products around us begin to change, Anderson says. A lot of what you’ll buy will still come from large companies that make mass-manufactured goods, but an increasing number of your products will be produced by ‘industrial artisans.’ These artisans will produce goods aimed for niche audiences—perhaps you’re a gardener who needs a specific kind of sprinkler head, or maybe you want computer speakers shaped like Mount Rushmore. Because they’ll be able to sell anywhere, and because their goods will command higher prices that mass-manufactured stuff, artisans will be able to build thriving small businesses from their inventions.”

•••••••••••

Homebrew at the Byte Shop in 1978:

Tags:

In a recent Guernica interview conducted by Emily Brennan, Katherine Boo, that excellent New Yorker writer, addressed the moral complexity of reporting about poverty for a magazine aimed at those with considerable disposable income. An excerpt:

“Guernica: 

At a lecture at American Academy, you recounted that during your reporting on that evacuation shelter for The New Yorker a woman told you, ‘Wait, so you take our stories and put them in a magazine that rich people read, and you get paid and we don’t? That’s some backward-ass bluffiness, if you ask me.’ She seemed to sum up the moral dilemma that reporting on poverty raises. Can you speak to some of these ethical questions?

Katherine Boo: 

She said it better than I did. We take stories and purvey them to people with money. And in the conventions of my profession, which I try to adhere to, we can’t pay people for stories. Anyone with a conscience who does this work grapples with that reality, and if they don’t, I’d worry. I lie awake at night, and I think, ‘Am I exploiting them? Am I a vulture?’ All of the terrible names anyone could call me, I’ve called myself worse.

But if writing about people who are not yourself is illegitimate, then the only legitimate work is autobiography; and as a reader and a citizen, I don’t want to live in that world. Because if you take a kid like Sunil, who’s been denied the possibility of an education that allows him to write his own story, and all of the people who lack the means and access to do so, they go down the memory hole. They’re lost. What it comes down to is, the only thing worse than being a poverty reporter is if no one ever wrote about it at all. My work, I hope, helps people understand how much gets lost between the intellection of how to get people out of poverty and how it’s actually experienced.

One of the reasons I pore over official documents and reportage is because I’m fascinated by the chasm between the lives that people have and the way they’re officially recorded. In Annawadi, when people were killed, they were categorized as sickness deaths because the officials were corrupt, were extorting money from other people, didn’t care to investigate the deaths of no-account people, and so on. The tragedy is that the other children in Annawadi knew that these people were murdered, that their lives had no meaning, that they’d be classified and filed away. The corrosive effect of that knowledge is staggering. When you know that anything can happen to you, that there is no possibility of redress because of who you are, because you’re an embarrassment in this prosperous city, that’s tragic. Sunil knows people who’ve been killed and filed away, and he can’t bring that to life. But he can tell me and I can get the documents and do the work and bring it to life. And that’s a trade-off to make.”

Tags: ,

From the November 1, 1901 Brooklyn Daily Eagle:

Great Falls, Mont.–A twelve year old boy named Southwick kidnaped the six year old son of G.W. Ryan, a prominent grocer, yesterday, and sent a note to the father demanding $1,500 ransom, threatening to put pieces of glass into the child’s eyes and cut his hands off unless the demand was complied with.

Mr. Ryan notified the police, who arrested young Southwick shortly after the Ryan boy had arrived at his father’s store unharmed, having been released by Southwick.

Southwick confessed that he did the deed of his own volition, and that he had no accomplices. He expressed no repentance and said: ‘I would have hit the old man for $8,000 if I thought he would have stood for it.'”

Tags: ,

Rust never sleeps and organic matter is apt to eventually decay. But sometimes that’s not a bad thing. From Jeff Gordinier’s New York Times piece about the growing popularity of fermented foods in fine dining:

“SAY this about Sandor Ellix Katz: the man knows how to get you revved up to eat bacteria.

‘Oh, this is nice kimchi,’ he said on a summer afternoon at Momofuku Noodle Bar, using chopsticks to pull crimson-coated knuckles of Napa cabbage from a jar. ‘I like the texture of the sauce. It’s kind of thick.’

Kimchi, like sauerkraut, is one of the world’s great fermented foods, andMr. Katz, a resident of Tennessee, was curious to see what David Chang’s team of cooks in the East Village would do with it. Lately Mr. Katz has become for fermentation what Timothy Leary was for psychedelic drugs: a charismatic, consciousness-raising thinker and advocate who wants people to see the world in a new way.

A fermented food is one whose taste and texture have been transformed by the introduction of beneficial bacteria or fungi.”

Tags: ,

Baxter, from the thoughtful people at Rethink Robotics, has come to relieve you of your toil–and your paycheck. In the long run, it’s for the best. Have a nice day.

Tags:

I Resent Being Alive

Can’t really tell this to anyone so I came here to spill it. So, Yeah. That’s it.

I read this passage from Susan Daitch’s “Dispatches” section at Guernica and my head nearly exploded. How did I not know about this? I’ve read that Ota Benga was displayed briefly at the Bronx Zoo in 1906 until an outcry thankfully shut that exhibit down, but I never heard of Carl Hagenback, his insane childhood or his human-centric dioramas. Nor did I know about the preponderance of private zoos in Europe which were often poorly maintained. An excerpt:

“Hagenbeck’s father, a fishmonger with a side business in exotic animals, gave Carl, when still a child, a seal and a polar bear cub as presents. Hagenback displayed them in a tub and charged a few pfennigs to spectators interested in watching arctic mammals splash around. Eventually his collection grew so extensive he needed larger buildings to house them. These early entrepreneurial endeavors led to a career capturing, buying, and selling animals from all over the world, destined for European and even distant American zoos. Hagenback, known as ‘the father of the modern zoo,’ was a pioneer in the concept that animals should be displayed in some approximation of their natural habitat. Acknowledging little difference between humans (at least some humans) and animals in terms of questions of captivity and display, he also exhibited human beings: Eskimos, Laps, Samoans, African, Arabs, Native Americans, all stationed in zoos across Europe in reproductions of their native environments. Creating panoramic fictional spaces for his creatures, Hagenbeck is often credited was being the originator of the amusement park. How these captive people felt about the peculiar dress, language and eating habits of the spectators who came to see them has not, as far as I know. European emissaries, whether propelled by diplomatic missions or for purposes of trade, went into the world and brought back artifacts, instigated the concept of collecting for those who could afford it. German museums would come to display the Gate of Ishtar brought brick by brick from Baghdad, vast Chinese temples, Assyrian fortresses, and other treasures. Hagenbeck, a hybrid figure, ethnographer, zoologist, showman, anthropologist, capitalist, but also the son of a fishmonger, was not of this class of adventurer. A populist, okay, but also the question hangs in the margins: When did the Berlin Zoo stop displaying humans? 1931, I think, but I’m not sure.”

Tags: ,

“Spider farming as a money making industry is yet in its infancy.”

A Frenchman and his spider farm are the focus of this bizarre Philadelphia Press story which was republished in the July 21, 1895 Brooklyn Daily Eagle. An excerpt:

“There is but one spider farm in the United States. As far as the writer can learn there are only two in the world. Entomologists have collected and raised spiders for purposes of scientific observation and investigation, just as bacilli and other unpleasant animals are nurtured. Here and there a spider has been made a pet of of by some lonely prisoner of Chillon or the Tombs, but spider farming as a money making industry is yet in its infancy. What in the world is done with a crop of spiders? One only has to go four miles from Philadelphia on the old Lancaster pike and ask for the farm of Pierre Grantaire to see what can be found nowhere else in this country and abroad only in a little French village in the department of the Loire.

Pierre Grantaire furnishes spiders at so much per hundred for distribution in the wine vaults of the merchant and the nouveau riches. His trade is chiefly with the wholesale merchant, who is able to stock a cellar with new, shining, freshly labeled bottles and in three months see them veiled with filmy cobwebs, so that the effect of twenty years of storage is secured at a small cost. The effect upon a customer can be imagined and is hardly to be measured in dollars and cents. It is a trifling matter to cover the  bins with dust. The effect is easy to the veriest tyro in the wine trade. But cobwebs–that is a different matter–cobwebs spun from cork to cork, cobwebs that drape the slender neck like delicate lace when the flask is brought to the light–the seal of years of slow mellowing and fruition.

It was a bit shuddering for the visitor, who had been brought up to smash a spider with a slipper or whatever came handiest, to be brought into a room, where there were spiders in front of him, spiders to the rear of him, myriads of spiders on every hand.

“This is Sara. She has the grace, the chic, the slender beauty of the divine Bernhardt. She is the pride of all my pets.”

The walls were covered with wire squares from six inches to a foot across, like magnified sections of the wire fence used to enclose poultry yards. Behind these wire screens the walls had been covered with rough planking. There were cracks between the boards, apparently left by design, and their weather beaten surfaces were dotted with knot holes and splintered crevises. The sunlight streamed through the open door and the room seemed hung with curtains of elfin woven lacework. The king of this fairy palace rapped his stubby pipe against the door, and the webs were dotted with black spots as the spiders scampered from their retreats in the wall cracks and a score of villainous looking pets as big as half dollars emerged from their crannies on a table and clustered against their glass roofing.

‘Tell us how you raise them, Pierre,’ asked the visitor.

‘Corbeau, it is a science, this raising of spiders. I have on hand at one time about 10,000 spiders, old and young. I brought some eggs from France, and the choicest webmakers to be found. This is Sara. She has the grace, the chic, the slender beauty of the divine Bernhardt. She is the pride of all my pets. Ah, here is Zola looking at you.’

A hideous hairy monster crawled up the wire netting that kept him within bounds and stared sardonically not a foot away from the writer’s pose. A start and an exclamation were natural, but Pierre looked aggrieved.

‘I do not blame you much,’ said he ‘Zola is good natured and would not hurt you, but he has the horrible look. He has fits of bad temper sometimes. Then ventrebleu, look you out. He is the bird spider of Surinam. His body is two inches long and he catches and eats small finches and sparrows when in the woods. His bite is bad poison. I doubt not it would kill you. But I tame him with kindness. He is king of all spiders–le grand monarch. therefore I call him Zola, the most superb of writers.”

Tags:

A proposed workaround solution for global warming from the Philosopher’s Beard, which stresses pragmatism over moralizing:

“The science of climate change does set the parameters of the problem, even though it doesn’t dictate the correct solution. The greenhouse gas build-up cannot be wished away by the kind of pragmatic, social choice guided exercise I have been recommending. It must be dealt with in the medium term, but through the structural transformation of our carbon economy rather than global austerity. That will include both developing scalable technologies for removing CO2 from the atmosphere (such as genetically modified algae and trees) and reducing the carbon intensity of our high energy life-styles (for which we already have some existing technologies, such as nuclear power). But note that such innovations require no prior global agreement to set in train, but can be developed and pioneered by a handful of big industrial economies acting on the moral concerns of their own citizens.

A high price on carbon in a few large rich countries (preferably via a non-regressive carbon tax) supplemented with regulations where market forces have less bite (e.g. to force the construction industry to develop more energy efficient methods and materials) and research subsidies would provide the necessary incentives. Nor would these innovations require global agreement for take-up since they will be attractive on their own merits (clean, efficient, cheap). Developing countries burn dirty coal because it is cheap and their people need electricity. They don’t need a UN treaty to tell them to use cleaner technology if it is cheaper; but neither would they sign up to such a treaty if it were more expensive.

The pragmatic approach does not depend on reaching an impossible global agreement on a perfect solution requiring moral or political coercion. Instead it offers feasible paths through the moral storm while respecting the existing interests and values of the human beings concerned.” (Thanks Browser.)

“Two heads / one body.”

Small weird/unusual/freaky taxidermy

I’m looking to start a private collection.
I’m looking for small (baby animals, squirel, chicks, ect) taxidermy.
But not just “regular” stuff. I’m looking for the weird / freaky / unusual stuff.
Some examples of what I’m looking for are – 

  • two heads / one body
  • conjoined twins
  • one head / two bodies
  • deformaties of all kinds
If you have anything please send a pic or detailed discription as well as what you are asking for it.
If you know of a web site where they sell the kind of taxidery I am looking for please send the name of the site or link to the site.

Thank you in advance! 

William and Kate: Bada-bing.

Has everyone in the world lost their minds? Why exactly is anyone upset that naked pictures (and perhaps sex pictures) of British royalty are being published? And why are the British royals themselves acting like it’s the end of the world? We should be worried about more important things, like all the poor people dying from starvation and all the poor people dying from obesity. (Yeah, I’m not sure how that’s possible, but it apparently is.) I’m not saying that it’s a great thing that someone took photos of a couple trying to share an intimate moment, but considering that the history of British royalty is filled with dubious or worse political proclivities and affiliations, this might be the first normal thing these people have ever done.

I do believe in privacy. If someone had reported needlessly on some embarrassment or failing or struggle or loss suffered by William and Kate, it would just be mean. And it’s not okay to be mean to people just because they’ll never have to worry about having enough to eat or paying their rent. But what has actually been revealed about these two? That they’re good-looking, in love, rich, healthy and extraordinarily privileged. Apart from the last one, those aren’t things to be embarrassed about.

There’s absolutely nothing obscene about two people having sex outdoors on a secluded 650-acre estate. Although any two people having a 650-acre estate to themselves is definitely obscene. I think everyone who’s royalty should have to earn their lavish lifestyles by having sex in public to entertain the people. Time to whip it out, you pasty layabouts.•

Camilla: Shall I get a strap-on, Charlie?

Charlie: Yes, dear. The black one, please.

Tags: ,

Rogers steadies himself on the wing, with Post in front of the propellor.

I never trust a person who doesn’t have enemies. In order to be so popular you had to close your eyes to some bad things, close your mouth as well. You’ve played politics and made deals with some devils. Of course, you could have plenty of enemies and still be a bad person, so I guess my system is flawed.

American humorist Will Rogers famously claimed to have never met a man he didn’t like, though he had darker philosophical leanings than that statement would indicate. Before he became a full-time comedian, the part-Cherokee Indian played a cowboy for circus and vaudeville crowds. He was a tremendously popular national figure when he died in 1935 in a downed plane that was piloted over Alaska by his friend, the famed aviator Wiley Post.

Tags: ,

From the November 4, 1896 Brooklyn Daily Eagle:

Colorado–Among the rich mines of Leadville is one called Dead Man’s claim. It seemed a certain popular miner had died, and his friends, having decided to give him a good send off, hired a man for $20 to act as a sexton. It was in the midst of winter; there were ten feet of snow on the ground and the grave had to go six feet below that. The grave digger sallied forth into the snow, depositing the corpse for safe keeping in a drift, and for three days nothing was heard from him. A delegation sent to find  the fellow discovered him digging away with all his might, but found also the intended grave converted into an entrance of a shaft. Striking the earth it seems that he found pay rock worth $60 a ton. The delegation at once staked out claims adjoining his and the deceased was forgotten. Later in the season, the snow having melted, his body was found and given an ordinary burial in another part of the camp.”

If you read this blog with any regularity you can understand that a story about the most famous pedestrian of the 1870s might have a special place in my heart. Still, this Grantland article by Brian Phillips about a walking wonder named Edward Payson Weston is wonderful on its own merits. The opening:

“In the summer of 1856, Edward Payson Weston was struck by lightning and fired from his job at the circus. He was 17 years old and had been traveling with the big top for no more than a few weeks — ‘under an assumed name,’ as he reassured the readers of his 1862 memoir, The Pedestrian. One day, as the troupe’s wagons passed near Tyngsborough, Massachusetts, he was ‘affected by a stroke of lightning’ and nearly killed. Nineteenth-century circus managers were about as tenderhearted as you would expect when it came to physical infirmity. When Weston was too sick to perform in Boston a few days later, he was unceremoniously sacked.

For most of us, being hit by lightning and kicked out of the circus would be an extraordinary turn of events. For Weston, it was a pretty typical week. Weston, whose story is recounted in the spectacularly entertaining book A Man in a Hurry, by the British trio of Nick Harris, Helen Harris, and Paul Marshall, lived one of those fevered American lives that seem to hurtle from one beautiful strangeness to the next. By his mid-teens, he had already: worked on a steamship; sold newspapers on the Boston, Providence, and Stonington Railroad; spent a year crisscrossing the country with the most famous traveling musicians in America, the Hutchinson Family Singers, selling candy and songbooks at their concerts; and gone into business for himself as a journalist and publisher. In his 20s and 30s, he somehow became one of the most celebrated athletes in the English-speaking world despite the fact that he was physically unprepossessing — 5-foot-7, 130 pounds, with a body resembling ‘a baked potato stuck with two toothpicks,’ as one journalist wrote — and that his one athletic talent was walking. Just straight-up walking made Weston, for a while, probably the biggest sports star on earth.”

Tags: ,

From Ashlee Vance’s well-rounded Businessweek portrait of Elon Musk, a brilliant and difficult man who is currently the most ambitious industrialist in the world:

“On the assumption that people will be living on earth for some time, Musk is cooking up plans for something he calls the Hyperloop. He won’t share specifics but says it’s some sort of tube capable of taking someone from downtown San Francisco to Los Angeles in 30 minutes. He calls it a ‘fifth mode of transportation’—the previous four being train, plane, automobile, and boat. ‘What you want is something that never crashes, that’s at least twice as fast as a plane, that’s solar powered and that leaves right when you arrive, so there is no waiting for a specific departure time,’ Musk says. His friends claim he’s had a Hyperloop technological breakthrough over the summer. ‘I’d like to talk to the governor and president about it,’ Musk continues. ‘Because the $60 billion bullet train they’re proposing in California would be the slowest bullet train in the world at the highest cost per mile. They’re going for records in all the wrong ways.’ The cost of the SF-LA Hyperloop would be in the $6 billion range, he says.

Musk is also planning to develop a new kind of airplane: ‘Boeing just took $20 billion and 10 years to improve the efficiency of their planes by 10 percent. That’s pretty lame. I have a design in mind for a vertical liftoff supersonic jet that would be a really big improvement.’

After a few hours with Musk, hypersonic tubes and jets that take off like rockets start to seem imminent. But interplanetary travel? Really? Musk says he’s on target to get a spacecraft to the red planet in 10 to 15 years, perhaps with him on board. ‘I would like to die on Mars,” he says. ‘Just not on impact.'”

Tags: ,

“I’ve begun to realize how obnoxious a drunk person can really be.”

question for the bar tenders/bar goers of nyc (ny)

so my dearest of drinking partners recently developed our weekly binge drinking sessions in to full blown alcoholism. he has been drinking pretty much every day of the week recently and as a result has been placed into recovery, so i can’t rely on him for being my go to guy when i need a boozing partner.as a result i’ve been going to bars by myself lately and i have to say the experience is…different. i still end up leaving the places shit faced drunk, but without having my friend with me i’ve begun to realize how obnoxious a drunk person can really be, especially considering that most of the people i see at the bar are no where near as drunk as i am. many nights i will socialize but i can kind of tell most people i talk to just want to cut the conversation short as fast as possible because they see how plastered i am.

bartenders are a bit more forgiving and tend to initiate convo with me, but mostly because they’re paid to and/or they’re just trying to gauge whether or not they should cut me off.

and here arises my question…

am i better off being that drunken dude that is somewhat obnoxious but great for a laugh, or that sullen, quiet drunk who goes out of his way to not initiate conversation with anybody, looking somewhat creepy in the process?

the irony of it all? the nights i try to start convo everybody seems to want to cut it short….the nights where i just want to get hammered and stare off into space everybody and their mother starts talking to me.

These three classic 1950 photos of pensive, unsmiling people were taken at a Dianetics seminar in Los Angeles, with the shadowy L. Ron Hubbard himself leading the meeting. Hubbard and his $4 self-empowerment book were largely ignored by the mainstream press until the title became a mammoth bestseller. From a 1950 Look magazine article about the rise of a new belief system, which initially took root most strongly in Los Angeles:

“Of all the dianetic centers, Los Angeles is the most exuberantly expansive and enthusiastic. There the Hubbard Foundation moved into a suite of modest offices last July. In August, it took over a two-story building housing a lecture theater and 20 ‘processing’ rooms. A few weeks later, it had to expand again – this time into a 110-room building where swarms of student auditors raptly attend Hubbard’s lectures and practice processing one another.

Still more recently, there have been instituted a series of weekend sessions at the swank Country Club Hotel in Hollywood. Here, taking over 20 or 30 rooms, a band of student auditors and pre-clears meet under the guidance of professional auditors for ‘intensive auditing with chemical assist.’

Hubbard and his associates insist that this use of drugs has nothing to do with narcosynthesis. They claim that ‘chemical assistants,’ purchasable in California at any drugstore, aid in helping resistant pre-clears to achieve dianetic reverie and to dredge up their basic-basic engrams.”

Tags:

From the June 24, 1894 Brooklyn Daily Eagle:

Riverhead, L.I.–In the ocean off Fort Pond, recently, on the fishing steamer, Montauk, Captain Burns of Greenport, caught over two thousand large Boston Mackerel. Jacob Josie, one of the crew, while dressing one of the fish, found in its entrails a cent of the 1889 date.”

Tags: ,

« Older entries § Newer entries »