Urban Studies

You are currently browsing the archive for the Urban Studies category.

"Dr. Nelden advertised for a man willing to sell an ear for $5,000."

“Dr. Nelden advertised for a man willing to sell an ear for $5,000.”

Selling your finger so that your kid can have music lessons is one thing, but a deal between a German restaurateur and a Western millionaire to transplant an ear from the former to the latter is one of the wilder antique newspaper pieces I’ve ever read. The story from the November 19, 1903 New York Times:

Philadelphia–Dr. Andrew L. Nelden of New York to-day performed the operation of grafting an ear upon the head of a Western millionaire, who the surgeon says he is under bond not to reveal. The operation was to have been performed in New York, but District Attorney Jerome is said to have interfered.

Dr. Nelden advertised for a man willing to sell an ear for $5,000, and from more than 100 applicants he selected a young German, who at one time conducted a restaurant in New York.

Dr. Nelden said to-day:

‘The operation has been performed and promises to be successful. It took place at a private hospital here, where I was assisted by a Philadelphia physician and one from New York. I think they will be willing to have their names known later.

‘The two men were placed in opposite directions upon an elongated bed. One-half of a volunteer’s ear –the upper half–was cut off, together with about four inches of the skin behind the ear.

‘This was twisted around and fitted to a freshly prepared wound upon my patient’s head. The half ear was held in place by bandages, and the two men were bound so that they could not move their heads. They must retain this position for at least twelve days to allow the circulation to come through the flap of skin that still remains as part of the volunteer’s scalp.

‘If this half ear starts to unite properly the lower half of the ear will be grafted in the same manner.'”

Tags: ,

We look back on pioneers with admiration–awe, even–their foolhardiness forgotten, their sense of adventure and sacrifice appreciated. It doesn’t matter if we’re talking about wagon-train Westerners, early aviators or Apollo astronauts who trusted in missions too difficult to comprehend–these are the heroes, the ones who’ve expanded the horizons. We look differently at the new pioneers, those who are taking a dangerous journey within, testing the human limits of biology and chemistry with the aid of drugs and implants. Just like their predecessors, they’re risking everything for a chance at a better life for them and for us. There will be casualties–there always are in pioneering.

A new video of biohacker Tim Cannon.

Tags:

Relatively wealthy nations benefit from ambitious space programs, even if it does test the conscience to send Whitey to the moon while sister Nell is nursing rat bites. But what about a relatively poor country like India, with its ambitions for space missions? Can that be justified? A rationale from the Economist:

“From a distance, India’s extra-terrestrial ambitions might seem like a waste of money. The country still has immense numbers of poor people: two-fifths of its children remain stunted from malnutrition and half the population lack proper toilets. Its Mars mission may be cheap by American (or Chinese) standards, at just $74m, but India’s overall space programme costs roughly $1 billion a year. That is more than spare change, even for a near $2-trillion economy. Meanwhile, spending on public health, at about 1.2% of GDP, is dismally low. What if the 16,000 scientists and engineers now working on space development were deployed instead to fix rotten sanitation? And why should donors bother to help tackle poverty where governments have enough spare resources to think about space? For some countries, at least, decent answers exist to such questions. Trips to the Moon and Mars may well be mostly about showing off. But most space programmes are designed to get satellites into Earth’s orbit for the sake of better communications, mapping, weather observation or military capacity at home. These bring direct benefits to ordinary people. Take one recent example: a fierce cyclone that hit India’s east coast last month killed few, whereas a similar-strength one in the same spot, in 1999, killed over 10,000. One reason for the improvement was that Indian weather satellites helped to make possible far more accurate predictions of where and when the storm would hit. Otherwise, improved data on monsoon rains, or generally shifting weather patterns, can help even the poorest farmers have a better idea of when to plant crops.

From a Singularity Hub piece about a flying robot that absorbs crashes, allowing it to learn by trial and error the way some insects do: “GimBall’s cage makes it mostly collision-proof and even informs its flight pattern. The robot evokes an insect repeatedly flying into a window until it finds open space and freedom.”

The Kardashians are the human detritus of capitalism, but they have a market.

It’s obviously no secret that fame has never been more lucrative and the Warholian fifteen minutes now stretches on seemingly forever. It’s the dark side of democracy, the gates, stormed, are gone for good. It’s one of those times when a victory seems like a loss. The opening of an interesting New Yorker blog post by Vauhini Vara about a service that aims to further capitalize on the shallow end of the talent pool:

If you’ve been dying to lunch with Mike Tyson before watching his one-man performance from the front row, you may be in luck. If Only, a Web site run by the San Francisco entrepreneur Trevor Traina, will set it up for fifty thousand dollars. You can also meet the singer Shakira for fifteen thousand dollars, or dine at the estate of the celebrity chef Michael Chiarello, with him, his wife, and eleven of your guests, for twelve thousand dollars. Madonna, Joe Montana, and Alice Waters have also offered ‘experiences’ through the site.

‘We’re recognizing that anyone who’s a top talent or a luminary has a natural market for their expertise, but no one has really created that marketplace for them,’ Traina told me over the phone last week. ‘Their time and attention has value, just like an empty guest room has value.’ IfOnly, in other words, aims to do for celebrities what Airbnb did for guest bedrooms: help people squeeze revenue from the unmonetized spaces in their own lives.•

Tags: ,

Before we have citizens conducting genetic engineering experiments in their garages, creating new life forms, we’ll see the average person being able to play with electronics on a scale unimaginable even a decade ago. Example: A Microsoft researcher believes we’re close to being able to print paper computers. From Paul Marks at New Scientist:

“‘IMAGINE printing out a paper computer and tearing off a corner so someone else can use part of it.’ So says Steve Hodges of Microsoft Research in Cambridge, UK. The idea sounds fantastical, but it could become an everyday event thanks in part to a technique he helped develop.

Hodges, along with Yoshihiro Kawahara and his team at the University of Tokyo, Japan, have found a way to print the fine, silvery lines of electronic circuit boards onto paper. What’s more, they can do it using ordinary inkjet printers, loaded with ink containing silver nanoparticles. Last month Kawahara demonstrated a paper-based moisture sensor at the Ubicomp conference in Zurich, Switzerland.

Kawahara says the idea is perfect for the growing maker movement of inventors and tinkerers. Hobbyists will be able to test circuit designs by simply printing them out and throwing away anything that doesn’t work. That will reduce much of electronics to a craft akin to ‘sewing or origami,’ he says.”

Tags: , ,

“Creepy.”

Guys With Guitars (Greenwich Village)

The next dude who pulls out a guitar and starts serenading me gets the Belushi Treatment! Creepy.

Loewy "aboard" his S1 steam locomotive.

Loewy “aboard” his S1 steam locomotive, 1939.

Loewy with Studebaker Avanti, 19

Loewy with Studebaker Avanti, 1962

Coffe shop, Idlewild Airport, 1962.

Coffee shop, Idlewild Airport, 1962.

As you can see from the Google Doodle, today would have been the 120th birthday of Raymond  Loewy, the French-born industrial designer who revolutionized his field after emigrating to the U.S. He was a veritable Disney of design, bringing a sleek intelligence to too many product categories to count. Here’s an excerpt from his 1986 New York Times obituary:

“His impact on industrial design was first felt in the 1920’s, when everyday objects tended to be dowdy in color, ungainly in shape and bulky in form. Mr. Loewy’s goal was to make such objects sleek and unencumbered.

He led the movement to change when he redesigned the Gestetner duplicating machine, ridding it of its gawky protuberances, encasing its mechanical parts in a simple shell and mounting the whole on a graceful base.

Mr. Loewy was later credited with creating a new profession of designers who have left their mark on nearly every aspect of modern life. As the architect Philip Johnson put it, ‘Raymond started industrial design and the streamlining movement.’

Soon after Mr. Loewy’s success with the Gestetner copier, the Loewy look began to crop up on hundreds of products – refrigerators, ballpoint pens, ocean liners and passenger trains, tricycles and motorcycles and buses, and eventually spacecraft.

Mr. Loewy gave objects a shape, an image, a ‘packaged’ look, putting his unique mark on Coca-Cola dispensers, dinnerware, sewing machines, toasters, electric clocks and radios and television sets, and even cookie shapes for Nabisco. An Eagle and a Jet

The familiar eagle silhouette logotype of the United States Postal Service is a Loewy design, and so is the distinctive look of the President’s white Air Force One jet.

The premier industrial designer was a showman, and by no means was he self-effacing. He said, for example, in a 1979 interview: ”My early colleagues and myself helped create the life styles of Americans and, by osmosis, of the rest of the world. I found it difficult to reconcile success with humility. I tried it first but it meant avoiding the very essence of my career – total exhilaration and the ecstasy of creativity.'”

Tags:

I wonder if huge companies like Google or Amazon (or the ones that supplant them) will eventually buy (or build) solar or wind facilities to provide their own carbon-neutral energy, allowing them to control costs on their massive servers and such while providing a cleaner environment. And perhaps they could sell energy to others in the manner that they offer the cloud. A big dream, I know. From an Associated Press story about Microsoft purchasing power from a Texas wind farm:

Houston — It takes a lot of energy to store all the data 1 billion people and 20 million businesses plug into their computers, phones, tablets and gadgets. So as part of an effort to become carbon neutral, Microsoft Corp. has entered a 20-year deal to buy power from a new wind farm in Texas, the first time the tech giant is directly purchasing electricity from a specific source. 

The deal announced Monday between Microsoft and RES Americas is being funded in part by money collected from a ‘carbon fee,’ an internal tax of sorts that the company has been charging its departments for every ton of carbon produced. Microsoft also hopes the deal will be a model for other parts of its global operations, said Brian Janous, Microsoft’s director of energy strategy.

As part of an effort to become carbon neutral, Microsoft has entered a deal to buy power from a new wind farm in Texas, the first time the tech giant is directly purchasing electricity from a specific source.

The vanilla wafers — for sale for years — have seen an uptick in sales following a campaign to connect with customers via Facebook and Twitter.

‘We’re definitely looking at this as a first of a kind, but it fits into our overall desire to have more control over our energy supply,’ Janous said.”

“Fuzzy Williams, another chimpanzee, was also picked as a likely subject for experiment.”

Some bored and/or drunk keepers at the Bronx Zoo dressed chimpanzees in cute outfits in the name of “science,” as evidenced by an article in the May 3, 1909 New York Times. An excerpt:

“The experiments which began a year ago with Prof. Melvin Haggerty’s study of ‘monkey psychology’ in the monkey house at the Bronx Park Zoo have been carried on by several of the keepers who took up the work where Mr. Haggerty left off, and they say that some interesting results have been achieved in the last few weeks. James Riley, one of the keepers, who presides over the big family of primates in captivity there, says he is going to write a book about it all. Some of the chapters will probably be written by Fred Engelholm, another keeper who has taken a leading part in the experiments with the monkeys.

It was Riley’s idea–the continuation of Mr. Haggerty’s experiments. Riley was very much interested in the way Mr. Haggerty went about his studies in the monkey house. In fact, Riley was a valuable aid to Mr. Haggerty while the Harvard man was there. He built some of the apparatus which was used in the experiments, such as trapdoor platforms, hollow tubes with secret springs, and other puzzles which the monkeys were supposed to solve in order to get stores of food which were hidden. While Mr. Haggerty’s experiments brought forth some surprising results, they did not go far enough to suit Riley and Engelholm.

When Mr. Haggerty packed up his apparatus and left the zoo with his two trained ringtails, Algernon and Percy. Keepers Riley and Engelbolm started in on their own account. They had plenty of time for their experiments in the Winter, when there were few visitors at the zoo. Each of the keepers had read several books on monkeys, written by men who had conducted experiments along a line which had apparently never been touched.

Baldy, a small black chimpanzee, was chosen as the most intelligent of all the monkeys at the Zoo. Fuzzy Williams, another chimpanzee, was also picked as a likely subject for experiment, and so were two of the ringtails, Mickey and Quickstep Slim. At the outset Riley built a little safe with a combination lock. There were only eight letters to the combination and it was not difficult to open it, provided the letter was known. After a few weeks of instruction Riley says that both of the chimpanzees were able to get into the safe quite readily. Always they found something nice in store for them–a banana, an apple, or some other fruit which monkeys like.

This experiment, however, was along the general line which had been adopted by Mr. Haggerty. Riley and Engelholm say they decided to try to teach the monkeys the significance of certain acts and sounds. They got a small dinner bell, which rang when a small button on top was pressed. They began by pressing this bell every time they fed the monkeys. After a few days they put the bell on a little shelf in Baldy’s cage. At first the chimpanzee insisted on ringing the bell almost constantly. But a few slaps on the hands broke him of this. The keepers taught Baldy to ring the bell whenever he saw them coming with food. It required more than a month’s training to accomplish this. But the keepers had plenty of time and patience.

The next experiment was with blackboard and chalk. The two ringtails, Mickey and Quickstep Slim, were chosen for the experiment. One of the keepers spent an hour or so a day in their cage drawing on the blackboard. The pictures drawn were very crude, only a few rough lines to represent some animal or inanimate object. Both monkeys seemed to take a keen interest in the blackboard work, the keepers say. When Mickey was first handed the chalk and put before the blackboard he seemed to think the chalk was something to eat, and began to nibble it.

‘But,’ says Riley, ‘after a little while he would sit there before the board, drawing just as we had been doing. The marks of the chalk on the board seemed to afford him a never-ceasing pleasure. Quickstep Slim also learned to use the chalk on the board instead of eating it. …

After the blackboard experiments the keepers tried to teach Fuzzy Williams and Baldy how to box with gloves. In this they had a hard task. The chimpanzees were willing enough to romp and to maul each other at times, but they seemed unable to learn how to use the gloves properly. The boxing gloves were made by the keepers and stuffed with wool. They were able to fit the hands of the monkeys. After putting them on, Riley would hold one of the chimpanzees and Engelholm the other, and would ‘bait’ them as cock fighters bait the cocks in the pit.

This experiment is still in its first stages, the keepers say. But they hope to develop boxers in Baldy and the other monkey.

There was another trick which the keepers taught one of the ringtails. It was to sit beside a small tub of water and hold a fishing pole over the tub. Of course the monkey did not know what he was doing, but the spectacle he presented was very amusing.”

Tags: , , , , , ,

A manufacturing job can disappear, an autonomous machine replacing a human worker, but will people invite the transition, will they hand over the wheel? The technology for driverless cars is close, but questions remain, both legal and practical. In the latter category: Driverless vehicles are so good environmentally because they crash so infrequently that they can be far lighter which means they’ll require less fuel. But how can cars be made so lightweight if we’re still split between autonomous vehicles and human-guided ones? From Kevin Robillard at Politico:

“Driverless cars are poised to begin transforming the nation’s roadways before the end of the decade, a major transportation group said Wednesday, but a top federal transportation official warned things might not be so easy.

The Eno Center for Transportation released a paper that predicted a nation full of driverless ‘autonomous’ vehicles could save $447 billion and 21,700 lives annually by preventing 4.2 million crashes and reducing fuel consumption by 724 million gallons. Still, switching from highways full of drivers to highways full of computers won’t be simple.

‘We’re looking at the introduction of AVs by the end of the decade,’ Daniel Fagnant, the paper’s author, said at an event Wednesday.

The switch to autonomous vehicles comes with enough potential benefits to make transportation policymakers giddy. Computers don’t get drunk, fall asleep or get distracted by text messages. They can stay a precise distance away from the car in front of them, reducing time and fuel wasted by congestion.

The headache comes in getting there.”

Tags:

Some more predictions from Norman Mailer’s 1970 Space Age reportage, Of a Fire on the Moon, which have come to fruition even without the aid of moon crystals:

“Thus the perspective of space factories returning the new imperialists of space a profit was now near to the reach of technology. Forget about diamonds! The value of crystals grown in space was incalculable: gravity would not be pulling on the crystal structure as it grew, so the molecule would line up in lattices free of  shift or sheer. Such a perfect latticework would serve to carry messages for a perfect computer. Computers the size of a package of cigarettes would then be able to do the work of present computers the size of a trunk. So the mind could race ahead to see computers programming go-to-school routes in the nose of every kiddie car–the paranoid mind could see crystal transmitters sewn into the rump of ever juvenile delinquent–doubtless, everybody would be easier to monitor. Big Brother could get superseded by Moon Brother–the major monitor of them all might yet be sunk in a shaft on the back face of the lunar sphere.”

Tags:

There are fewer postcards and hand-written notes today, but I don’t think anyone would argue against the idea that more people in the world are writing more in the Internet Age than at any moment in history. What we’re writing is largely bullshit, sure, but not all of it is. It’s really the full flowering of democracy, like it or not. From Walter Isaacson’s New York Times review of Clive Thompson’s glass-half-full tech book, Smarter Than You Think:

“Thompson also celebrates the fact that digital tools and networks are allowing us to share ideas with others as never before. It’s easy (and not altogether incorrect) to denigrate much of the blathering that occurs each day in blogs and tweets. But that misses a more significant phenomenon: the type of people who 50 years ago were likely to be sitting immobile in front of television sets all evening are now expressing their ideas, tailoring them for public consumption and getting feedback. This change is a cause for derision among intellectual sophisticates partly because they (we) have not noticed what a social transformation it represents. ‘Before the Internet came along, most people rarely wrote anything at all for pleasure or intellectual satisfaction after graduating from high school or college,’ Thompson notes. ‘This is something that’s particularly hard to grasp for professionals whose jobs require incessant writing, like academics, journalists, lawyers or marketers. For them, the act of writing and hashing out your ideas seems commonplace. But until the late 1990s, this simply wasn’t true of the average nonliterary person.'”

Tags: ,

A paragraph from Margaret Atwood’s New York Review of Books’ review of Dave Eggers’ The Circle about the malignant undercurrent of technotopia:

“Some will call The Circle a ‘dystopia,’ but there’s no sadistic slave-whipping tyranny on view in this imaginary America: indeed, much energy is expended on world betterment by its earnest denizens. Plagues are not raging, nor is the planet blowing up or even warming noticeably. Instead we are in the green and pleasant land of a satirical utopia for our times, where recycling and organics abound, people keep saying how much they like each another, and the brave new world of virtual sharing and caring breeds monsters.”

Tags: ,

Baseball, it is thought, doesn’t attract athletes from poorer backgrounds into college programs because it isn’t a popular TV sport on an amateur level and can’t offer full scholarships to very many players. College basketball and football make tons of TV loot and can provide full scholarships, so conventional wisdom says children of poverty with great athletic skill gravitate to them. Except maybe poverty is too much of an impediment for all but a few outliers. From Seth Stephens-Davidowitz in the New York Times:

AS the N.B.A. season gets under way, there is no doubt that the league’s best player is 6-foot-8 LeBron James, of the Miami Heat. Mr. James was born poor to a 16-year-old single mother in Akron, Ohio. The conventional wisdom is that his background is typical for an N.B.A. player. A majority of Americans, Google consumer survey data show, think that the N.B.A. is composed mostly of men like Mr. James. But it isn’t.

I recently calculated the probability of reaching the N.B.A., by race, in every county in the United States. I got data on births from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; data on basketball players from basketball-reference.com; and per capita income from the census. The results? Growing up in a wealthier neighborhood is a major, positive predictor of reaching the N.B.A. for both black and white men. Is this driven by sons of N.B.A. players like the Warriors’ brilliant Stephen Curry? Nope. Take them out and the result is similar.”

Tags:

There’s a Warholian triumph in Norway called “Slow TV,” which is sort of a long-form staring contest, except that viewers spend eight or so hours staring at real-time knitting contests and train trips. Rights have been purchased by American producers, though no one knows yet if this antidote to instant gratification will translate. From Nancy Tartaglione at Deadline.com:

“Knit one, purl … eight-plus hours of live stitching? That’s what’s happening tonight on Norwegian public broadcaster NRK2 as folks around the country gather in viewing parties. The show is part of a phenomenon known as Slow TV which has increasingly captivated Norway. The overall gist of the concept, to which LMNO Productions recently acquired U.S. rights, is a hybrid of unhurried documentary coupled with hours and hours of continuous coverage provided by fixed cameras trained on a subject or an event. Prior to tonight, those have included a 7.5-hour train journey, a 134-hour coastal cruise, a stack of firewood and salmon. Tonight, NRK2 will turn its lens on National Knitting Evening. Four hours of discussion on the popular pastime will kick off at 8 PM local, before a sheep gets trotted out at midnight to be sheared and its wool spun into yarn.”

_____________________________

Colbert celebrates Slow TV:

Tags:

"Dead pets appreciated."

“Donations of deceased pets appreciated.”

DONATIONS WANTED: skull & wet preserve collector (Woodstock, NY)

Seeking donations for skull and wet preserve collector with interest in comparative anatomy. Not so interested in taxidermy mounts, but anything else may be of interest.

Locations of roadkill within the area or donations of deceased pets appreciated. Unfortunately not looking to buy due to lack of funds.

Because Bill Gates has only done three million interviews thus far in his life, the Financial Times’ headline writers thought they should label the paper’s new dialogue with him as “exclusive.” The crux of the discussion is an interesting one: Is it more important to give poor people access to the Internet or give them malaria medicine. If you have malaria, it’s a pretty easy choice. But I do think providing information where there is little empowers people. Sure, food, water and medicine first, but then let’s share the Internet. From Richard Waters “exclusive”:

“There is no getting round the fact, however, that Gates often sounds at odds with the new generation of billionaire technocrats. He was the first to imagine that computing could seep into everyday life, with the Microsoft mission to put a PC on every desk and in every home. But while others talk up the world-changing power of the internet, he is under no illusions that it will do much to improve the lives of the world’s poorest.

‘Innovation is a good thing. The human condition – put aside bioterrorism and a few footnotes – is improving because of innovation,’ he says. But while ­’technology’s amazing, it doesn’t get down to the people most in need in anything near the timeframe we should want it to.’

It was an argument he says he made to Thomas Friedman as The New York Times columnist was writing his 2005 book, The World is Flat, a work that came to define the almost end-of-history optimism that accompanied the entry of China and India into the global labour markets, a transition aided by the internet revolution. ‘Fine, go to those Bangalore Infosys centres, but just for the hell of it go three miles aside and go look at the guy living with no toilet, no running water,’ Gates says now. ‘The world is not flat and PCs are not, in the hierarchy of human needs, in the first five rungs.’ “

Tags: ,

mmmmm

In a world of centralized media, critics were given too much importance. In a time of algorithms, they’ve been reduced. No one waits for the “emperor” to offer a thumbs up or down anymore; the spectators do it themselves. Even TV critics, who’ve rode to new prominence thanks to a wave of popular shows and binge-watching Americans gripping tablets and smartphones, have very little real impact. From a New York Times discussion about literary criticism and Twitter by Adam Kirsch and Anna Holmes, a passage by the former:

“At first glance, it seems that critics, in particular, should relish a tool like Twitter. Criticism is a kind of argument, and Twitter is excellent for arguing back and forth in public. Criticism is also a kind of reportage, and Twitter is an ideal way of breaking news. With many major events, from presidential debates to the Oscars, it is more informative and entertaining to follow them in real time on Twitter than it is to actually watch them. For all these reasons, journalists have been especially avid users of Twitter.

Critics, however, have been surprisingly reluctant to embrace the tweet. Many of the most prominent are not on Twitter at all. Those who are tend to use their feeds for updates on their daily lives, or to share links, or at most to recommend articles or books — that is, they use Twitter in the way everyone else does. What is hard to find on Twitter is any real practice of criticism, anything that resembles the sort of discourse that takes place in an essay or a review.

This absence, like the dog that didn’t bark in Sherlock Holmes, may be an important clue to the true nature of criticism. Never in history has it been easier than it is today to register one’s approval or disapproval of anything. The emblem of our age is the thumbs-up of the ‘like’ button. If criticism is nothing more than a drawn-out version of a thumbs-up or a thumbs-down, there’s no reason it shouldn’t be made obsolete by the retweet or the five-star Amazon review. Cut to the chase, the Internet demands, of critics and everyone else: Should we buy this thing or not?

Tags: ,

The opening of an NBC News update on Elon Musk’s Hyperloop, which identifies the team leaders and timeline for the project:

Prototypes of Elon Musk’s high-speed ‘Hyperloop’ transit will be ready by 2015, according to the group taking over development of the project. That’s just two years after Musk first described his idea to transport humans between cities in pods accelerated to near-supersonic speeds.

A newly created company, ‘Hyperloop Transportation Technologies,’ will lead the charge, its team leaders announced Thursday. They also published a project timeline for the next two years

Piloting the ship are Marco Villa, an ex-SpaceX man, and Patricia Galloway, who has served as CEO of a management consulting firm, presided over the American Society of Civil Engineers,and sat a term on the National Science Board under President George W. Bush. They are backed by JumpStarterFund, sort of a Kickstarter for startups, based in California.  

While the leadership of the company has been appointed in August 2013, the ranks have yet to be filled out. More than 160 aspiring Hyperloopers have turned in applications from the U.S., Europe, and Asia. They will receive stock options for contributing part-time or full-time work.”

Tags: ,

From the September 28, 1895 New York Times:

Rochester, N.Y.–James Foley of Wheatland is about to become the plaintiff in an unusually interesting case of law. The action is to be entitled James Foley vs. Philip C. Dickinson, and is to be for $5,000 damages for injuries to the plaintiff’s health, alleged to have been caused by drinking impure water purchased from the defendant.

The parties reside near each other on a farm, and Foley purchased his water supply from Dickinson for $12 per year. After using the water two years Foley experienced violent pains in his stomach. Medical aid was summoned and the doctors thought he had dyspepsia. 

Shortly afterward, while playing dominoes with his family one evening, a grunting sound was heard, which caused the children to jump and exclaim, ‘What’s that?’

Suddenly it dawned on Foley that he had swallowed some live thing while drinking the water. He came to the city and sought legal advice to-day, but no lawyer has been found yet who will take the case. Foley claims the animal inside him is a frog. He says that recently, while in church, the frog in his stomach sang and roared until it disturbed the meeting and he had to walk out of church.”

 

Tags: ,

The opening paragraph of an Economist article about research which aims to reduce the price of solar cells from manageable to microscopic:

“SOLAR cells were once a bespoke product, reserved for satellites and military use. In 1977 a watt of solar generating capacity cost $77. That has now come down to about 80 cents, and solar power is beginning to compete with the more expensive sort of conventionally generated electricity. If the price came down further, though, solar might really hit the big time—and that is the hope of Henry Snaith, of Oxford University, and his colleagues. As he described recently in Science, Dr Snaith plans to replace silicon, the material used to make most solar cells, with a substance called a perovskite. This, he believes, could cut the cost of a watt of solar generating capacity by three-quarters.”

Tags:

From a Foreign Affairs interview that Gideon Rose conducted with roboticist Sebastian Thrun, a passage about the subject’s triumph in a 2005 driverless-car competition in the Mojave Desert:

Question:

Why did your project end up working so well?

Sebastian Thrun:

Many of the people who participated in the race had a strong hardware focus, so a lot of teams ended up building their own robots. Our calculus was that this was not about the strength of the robot or the design of the chassis. Humans could drive those trails perfectly; it was not complicated off-road terrain. It was really just desert trails. So we decided it was purely a matter of artificial intelligence. All we had to do was put a computer inside the car, give it the appropriate eyes and ears, and make it smart.

In trying to make it smart, we found that driving is really governed not by two or three rules but by tens of thousands of rules. There are so many different contingencies. We had a day when birds were sitting on the road and flew up as our vehicle approached. And we learned that to a robot eye, a bird looks exactly the same as a rock. So we had to make the machine smart enough to distinguish birds from rocks.

In the end, we started relying on what we call machine learning, or big data. That is, instead of trying to program all these rules by hand, we taught our robot the same way we would teach a human driver. We would go into the desert, and I would drive, and the robot would watch me and try to emulate the behaviors involved. Or we would let the robot drive, and it would make a mistake, and we would go back to the data and explain to the robot why this was a mistake and give the robot a chance to adjust.

Question:

So you developed a robot that could learn?

Sebastian Thrun:

Yes. Our robot was learning. It was learning before the race, and it was learning in the race.”

Tags: ,

While normally you wouldn’t link candy and colonoscopies, an NPR story by Shankar Vendatam does just that in trying to explain the mystery of happiness. In a nod to Daniel Kahneman’s classic study about the painful medical procedure, researchers used Halloween candy to prove that satisfaction isn’t dependent just on quantity but also on order of experience. An excerpt:

“What makes trick-or-treaters happy is candy. And more candy is better, right?

Well, it turns out that might not actually be the case. A few years ago researchers did a study on Halloween night where some trick-or-treaters were given a candy bar, and others were given the candy bar and a piece of bubble gum.

Now, in any rational universe, you would imagine that the kids who got the candy bar and the bubble gum would be happier than the kids who got just the candy bar. George Wolford, a psychologist at Dartmouth College, and his fellow researchers, Amy Doe and Alexander Rupert, found something quite different.

‘Those children that got both the full-sized candy bar and the bubble gum second, rated how delighted they were to get these treats lower than those people that got the candy bar only,’ Wolford says.”

Tags: , , , ,

Lou Reed, who certainly learned a thing or two about how to relentlessly sell his brand from his Pop Artist mentor Andy Warhol, could be mean and full of shit. But he was a great artist. Occasionally an awful one, but often great. From his Economist obituary, a passage about how difficult he made categorization:

“The man could be just as perplexing, and played it up. Was he really a badass city boy? In fact he came from the New York suburbs, and for two years—between leaving the Velvet Underground in 1970 and making his first solo albums, helped by David Bowie, in 1972—he worked as a typist in his father’s accountancy firm. Did he really take so many drugs? No, he didn’t take them at all (he blurrily told a circle of reporters at Sydney airport in 1974), but he thought everyone else should, because they were ‘better than Monopoly.’ Was he homosexual? He had a very public transvestite love affair once; in the mid-1970s he adopted leather jackets and short blonde curls; later he wore nail varnish and mascara. But there were heterosexual marriages too, paired with romantic songs.”

Tags:

« Older entries § Newer entries »