Old Print Articles

You are currently browsing the archive for the Old Print Articles category.

Henry Ward Beecher: Congregationalist pussy hound. (Image by Mathew Brady.)

Connecticut resident Delight Beecher may not have been the most well-known member of her famous family, but she had an interesting life just the same. She was a part of the clan best known for celebrated preacher and abolitionist Henry Ward Beecher (who was ensnared in an adultery scandal in the 1870s) and Harriet Beecher Stowe, author of Uncle Tom’s Cabin. Delight, who outlived both of her younger relations and never visited a dentist in her life, was the subject of a brief article in the May 18, 1901 Brooklyn Daily Eagle, on the occasion of having reached the 100-year-old mark. (She would live until 103.) An excerpt:

“Mrs. Delight Beecher Upson, a cousin of Henry Ward Beecher, celebrated the 100th anniversary of her birth at her home, in Burlington, near this city yesterday. The event was made the occasion of a public celebration.

Mrs. Upson delights in talking of her famous cousin, Henry Ward Beecher.

Mrs. Upson is well-preserved. Aside from deafness, her faculties are only slightly impaired. She prides herself on never having required the services of a dentist. Her physical endurance is remarkable. One day last week she walked to a neighbor’s home and back, a distance of half a mile.

Mrs. Upson’s mind is clear and she tells with precision important events of the earlier years of the nineteenth century. Her maternal grandfather served in the Revolution, and her nephews took part in the War of 1812. She has always been an ardent Congregationalist.

Two years ago Mrs. Upson visited Collinsville, where she saw a railroad for the first time in forty years.”

Tags: , ,

"She swung a handsome unbrella in one hand with an air of quiet determination." (Image by Amelia Van Buren.)

A willowy widow who was wronged wickedly wielded an umbrella to gain a measure of revenge against a pair of railroad executives in Brooklyn in 1889. The Daily Eagle provided a blow-by-blow account in its March 31 edition (and the Times also provided a report of the unusual confrontation.) An excerpt:

“A tall, thin, willowy blonde woman, elegantly attired in a black dress, a black hat, a close fitting green tailor made coat, with a fur boa around her neck, walked uneasily back and forth in front of the entrance to the offices of the Union Elevated Railroad, 31 Sands street, on Friday morning. It lacked a few minutes of being 9 o’clock and it was apparent that she was expecting some one at that hour. She swung a handsome unbrella in one hand with an air of quiet determination.

She had not long to wait. Presently a carriage drove up to the curb and out stepped Major Stephen Pettus, the secretary andf treasurer of the Union Elevated Railroad, and Mr. Joseph Elliott, his brother in law and one of the directors of the road.

‘You scoundrel! You deceiver! You heartless betrayer!,’ screamed the tall, thin woman, as soon as she caught sight of Major Pettus and Mr. Elliott.

There was a tremendous scene forthwith and a crowd of people, who had been hurrying toward the bridge, paused and gathered around to listen. Messrs. Elliott and Pettus made some rapid and vehement remarks, and the tall young woman lent emphasis to her derogatory statements concerning the two railroad magnates by brandishing her umbrella and whacking and thumping Messrs. Elliott and Pettus with it as fast as she could. She first directed her attack against Major Pettus, and when Mr. Elliott stepped between she turned her attention to him and he had to put up his arm to defend his head and shoulders from the shower of blows she rained upon him.

"He had to put up his arm to defend his head and shoulders from the shower of blows she rained upon him." (Image by Jean D'Alembert.)

The street was full of people and a big crowd collected in a twinkling. There was a great deal of excitement. An officer was close by, but did not interfere and no arrests were made. Messrs. Elliott and Pettus escaped upstairs into the railroad offices and the woman went away.

In the afternoon when the reporter called he was informed by a servant that Major Pettus was not at home and that Mrs. Pettus was entertaining company in the parlor and could not be disturbed. In the evening Mr. Elliott was found at the house. He said that Major Pettus had been sick all day and was lying in bed asleep. Mr. Elliott was asked to relate the particulars of Friday’s sensational occurrence. He said:

‘Major Pettus and I are the persons who were assaulted. This woman was waiting for us and when we reached the sidewalk in front of 31 Sands street she applied every conceivable derogatory epithet to us.’

‘What is the name of the young woman?’

‘She is Mrs. Hannah Martin Southworth. She is a widow, I believe. I do not think she has any children. I do not know whether her husband ran away  or is dead. If he is dead he is probably in heaven.’

‘You know her?’

‘Oh, yes. I have known her for several years.’

‘Did Major Pettus also know her?’

‘Yes, he knew her well.’

‘What was the nature of her charges against you?’

‘That is a private matter which I do not propose to discuss.’

He positively refused to discuss the nature of Mrs. Southworth’s charge against Major Pettus, on the ground that the Major was a married man, whose domestic affairs ought not to be dragged into the newspapers under any circumstances.

‘This woman merely wants the earth. She is a holy terror.'”

Tags: , ,

The spectre of the hangman didn’t diminish Clement Arthur Day’s appetite or sense of humor. The veteran, who had served General Custer, had a relatively jovial time on the day he was hanged for the brutal murder of his girlfriend in upstate New York. The execution took place in Utica, and the Brooklyn Daily Eagle filed a report about the unusual proceedings in its February 9, 1888 edition. An excerpt:

“Clement Arthur Day was hanged here this morning. He ate a hearty supper at 6 o’clock last evening, and at 12:15 called for shrimp salad, bologna sausage, bread and oranges, which were furnished and of which he ate heartily. Before this lunch he sang several songs, danced a jig and imitated the crowing of a cock, which being answered by some women prisoners in another portion of the jail pleased him immensely. At 12:39 he retired and was soon sleeping soundly. He did not awaken until 6:30 this morning when he arose complaining of a slight headache and a sour stomach and asked for a seidlitz powder.

This being furnished and taken, Day proceeded to make away with a hearty breakfast of ham and eggs, toast and coffee, and then practiced for a while on his guitar. At 7:30 he was shaved and dressed, ready for the expected visit of his spiritual adviser. He spoke lightly of his now rapidly approaching doom and asked that he be furnished with a substantial lunch before the march to the gallows began.

The Rev. E. Owen, Day’s spiritual comforter, arrived at 9:15 and was at once closeted with the condemned, who seemed the less nervous of the two. Just before the clergyman’s arrival Day announced his attention of making no remarks at the scaffold or to the press and walked down the corridor humming a lively tune. He was most particular about his dress and allowed a deputy to spend considerable time over him with a brush broom. During the brief interval before the reading of the death warrant the Rev. Mr. Owen offered prayer. He was followed by Day with an eloquent supplication in which the doomed man said he was not guilty of premeditated murder. Sheriff Batchelor then read the warrant, to which Day listened with a grin on his face. His arms were then pinioned and the march to the scaffold was begun. Day laughed at a reporter who slipped on the icy walk. Then the murderer mounted the platform with a firm tread. He even assisted in placing the noose under his chin and yawned during the operation. A brief prayer was said and the drop fell at 10:24 1/24 and nine minutes later he was pronounced dead. The neck was broken and the face not contorted. But twenty-four persons witnessed the execution.

The crime for which Day was executed was the murder of Josie Rosa Cross, near Boonville on the 8th of June last. The victim was the daughter of a respectable woman who resides in Rome. She met Day after having separated from her husband by mutual consent. She was prepossessing and well educated, having formerly an excellent reputation as a teacher of music. After residing with Day at different places for a year or so the couple moved in May last to the scene of the crime, where they resided with Day’s father, who was a lock tender on the Black River Canal. The girl’s mother wrote Josie that she was dying and wanted her at her bedside. The letter infuriated Day, who declared that it was a scheme to part him from Josie, but he finally consented to her going, threatening that if she did not return he would kill both her and her mother. On the morning of the date the crime was committed Josie started to walk to Boonville to mail a letter to her mother in reference to the proposed visit. Day left the house with her and when only a short distance from it threw his arm around her and with a large butcher knife stabbed her fourteen times in the breast and heart.”

Tags: , , , ,

"At five o’clock yesterday afternoon, Bernard Duffy, a dissipated veteran soldier..."

New York City was a dangerous place in the years after the Civil War. Scoundrels were everywhere and it seemed that every other person was living under an alias–or several. Life was cheap and the bodies piled up. An account in the September 6, 1870 Brooklyn Daily Eagle explains how the War Between the States contributed belatedly to yet another casualty. Some descriptive words used in the first paragraph alone: dissipated, dilapidated, wretched, precarious, unfortunate and revolting. An excerpt:

“At five o’clock yesterday afternoon, Bernard Duffy, a dissipated veteran soldier, who resided in a small and dilapidated frame structure at No. 41 Little street, where his wife kept a wretched store, from the income of which she provided a precarious living for her unfortunate husband, self and several small children, was beaten to death in the most brutal and shocking manner by the husband of his sister, James Moody, a junkman, at the dwelling place of the latter, No. 43 Little street, under the most revolting circumstances, which, from investigations made by reporters of the Eagle, seem to be substantially as follows: During the late civil war, it is stated, the deceased entered the service of the United States as a private soldier, and upon enlistment, entrusted a portion of his bounty money to his then unmarried sister, now Mrs. Moody, for safe keeping, departing, himself, soon after for the front.

"Duffy after having several times vainly demanded his money from his sister, went to her house some time since and insisted on its payment."

Subsequently, the national struggle having ended, he received his discharge and returned to this city, where he again met his sister, who had, meanwhile, become the wife of Moody, who was reputed to be in comfortable pecuniary circumstances. Duffy, upon returning, also married and had become the father of three children. The two comparatively newly married couples subsequently took up their abodes in the above mentioned locality, and for a time lived in neighborly harmony. Finally, however, it seems Duffy after having several times vainly demanded his money from his sister, went to her house some time since and insisted on its payment, when, it is stated, she seized a club and drove him in the street, breaking one of his thumbs by the onslaught. The unfortunate soldier, who seems to have thereafter given himself to inebriety and to have been intoxicated at this time, then relinquished, for a time, the attempt to recover his money but, yesterday afternoon, goaded and crazed by poverty and liquor, he again visited the home of his sister and demanded his own, which was, as previously, refused, whereupon he became furious and abusive, and was peremptory in his demands. The sister, however, resolutely refused to comply with the demand, whereupon he loudly applied the most opprobrious epithets to her.

Meanwhile, Moody, who was chopping wood in the cellar of the building, heard the altercation and ascended to the apartment, where he found Duffy, according to the allegations of his sister, using the vilest language and threatening violence. Moody then remonstrated with his inebriate brother-in-law, who declined to listen, and refusing to leave the house when ordered, advanced to attack Moody, who seizing a club made a murderous assault upon Duffy, felling him to the floor with a terrible blow, followed by others of a frightful nature, after the victim had fallen. The head of the unfortunate Duffy was thus terribly mutilated, there being several deep gashes upon the forehead and also upon the back of the head, which seems to have been crushed by the formidable weapon, which was a jagged piece of oak between two and three feet in length, and very heavy.

"She seized a club and drove him in the street, breaking one of his thumbs by the onslaught." (Inage by Brian C. Goss.)

During the assault the miserable victim groaned till beaten into a state of insensibility, and the sister, horrified at the brutal murder of her brother by her husband, screamed loudly for help, in response to which an excited crowd soon gathered, and upon learning of the atrocious deed, loudly clamored for the murderer, who, upon search being made, proved to have fled, and, for a time at least to have made good his escape. Attention was then directed to the wounded man, who lay in a pool of blood, horribly disfigured, motionless and scarcely breathing perceptibly. Upon removing the dying man to his own lowly home, Dr. Whitehead was summoned, but, upon examining  the patient, he immediately pronounced his fearful wounds of a fatal nature. Every remedy known and medical skill available under the circumstances was applied for the relief of the rapidly sinking man, but without avail, and about two hours after the assault he expired.

Captain McConnell quickly repaired to the abode of death, which presented a truly heartrending scene. In the back part of the miserable apartment, about six feet by ten feet in dimensions, lay the lifeless form of the murdered man, stretched upon the floor, surrounded by the fatherless children and the wretched widow, crying in a piteous manner. The dingy room was but poorly lighted by an oil lamp, whose feeble rays only rendered the scene more sickening, and made the appearance of the poverty more striking.”

Tags: , , ,

"She said she was Miss Pauline Chase, a member of the 'Cadet Girl' company. She went out to secure bail for the prisoner."

Wearing a disguise and pretending to be a Harvard man, a lad who had been obsessively following a troupe of chorus girls and who’d caused a disturbance at one of their performances gets arrested for “masquerading” at a Brooklyn theater. A story about the unusual crime from the December 16, 1900 edition of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle:

“A young man who said he was a Harvard student was arrested last night at the Amphion Theater, charged with masquerading.

At the Lee avenue police station, where he was taken by Officer Thomas Carroll, he gave his name as William Kibbey and his address as 43 West Twenty-seventh street, Manhattan. He gave his age as 21 years, and said his parents lived in Iowa.

Kibbey, it is said, has been following the ‘Cadet Girl’ company from place to place. Early in the week, it is claimed, he created a disturbance in the theater and was ejected, it is said. Last night in order to get by the doorekeeper he wore a red beard.

Soon after the young man was locked up in the Lee avenue station a young woman appeared there and asked about Kibbey. She said she was Miss Pauline Chase, a member of the ‘Cadet Girl’ company. She went out to secure bail for the prisoner.”

Tags: , ,

"We have nothing to say, but we hope you will be lenient."

It wasn’t so easy being a judge in Brooklyn back in the day. The accused could use aliases and there was no way to check on them. But a pair of convicted lady shoplifters couldn’t escape their criminal past after being pinched while trying to steal a camel’s hair shawl at a Flatbush Avenue shop. The Brooklyn Daily Eagle ran a story about their sentencing on December 23, 1876. An excerpt:

“The two female shoplifters who stole the camel’s hair shawl from Journeay & Burnham’s, and who were convicted last Thursday, were sentenced in the Court of Sessions this morning. Quite a crowd were in waiting to see what Judge Moore would do with them. Another woman said to be a sister was with them.

Deputy Clerk York opened the Court of Sessions and the prisoners, Mary Martin and Catharine Martin, were called to the bar. Mary is tall and skinny with sallow skin and dark eyes. She was dressed in a cotton velvet cloak trimmed with beads and a dark dress. The other is short and fleshy, with round face, fat chin and wore a woolen shawl around her shoulders.

They were sworn and the tall one gave her name as Mary Martin, said she was thirty-seven years old, born in Germany and a dressmaker by trade. The other woman said her name was Catherine Martin, thirty-three years old, born in Pennsylvania and a dressmaker by trade. Both denied they had ever been in State Prison. It is not known what their real names are.

These preliminaries settled, the clerk asked them whether they had anything to say why the judgement of the Court should not be pronounced. Catherine, the younger woman replied, ‘We have nothing to say, but we hope you will be lenient.’

Camel: String 'em up. (Image MaddiyK.)

In passing the sentence Judge Moore said: ‘If it were not for the fact that you two women have been for years past known to the police authorities as two of the most expert professional shoplifters in the country, the plea of leniency would have a good deal of force, but when we know the fact that for years past you have been engaged in the commission of crimes, as professional criminals, that you are notorious from one end of the country to the other, in your case we cannot abate much of the extreme penalty prescribed by the law for your offense. One of you, at least, has been in the State Prison and I think both of you.

‘This attempt to steal their goods from merchants in this city and to deprive them of their property was a bold attempt, but was fortunately frustrated. Considering your character and the character of your offense, we have concluded that the sentence should be this: That each of your shall be imprisoned in the Penitentiary of this county for four years and six months.’

The prisoners received the sentence without emotion, save wiping their eyes with their handkerchiefs, and were removed in the custody of the officers. They won’t trouble the shopkeepers of Fulton street for some time to come.

On the eve of the trial, after recess, two children were brought into Court, ostensibly as the children of the older woman, and she received them very pathetically. It had a curious effect on the jury. One juryman said afterward that he didn’t believe the children were her’s, as they had blue eyes, and another juryman said he knew them, they were thieves, for the children were dressed too well.”

Judge Judy: I once found an avocado guilty of being too succulent. (Image by Susan Roberts.)

Tags: , , ,

“All the stern giving up of beer and potatoes…”

Obesity was apparently hilarious in the 1870s. No one was wringing their meaty hands over having a huge ass–they celebrated their rolls of flesh. Hence, the existence of clubs specifically for the big-boned. In the August 30, 1872 Brooklyn Daily Eagle, there was vital coverage of a Connecticut clam bake held by one such club. (The Times also filed a report.) An excerpt:

“The formation of the celebrated Fat Men’s Club was in accordance with a well received rule in the economy of fat men’s lives. There is a time in the affairs of fat men, or rather of men who are growing fat, when they view the approach of the fleshly enemy with undisguised dread. Tell Jones at thirty-two that he is getting fat and he says, ‘ah, why bless my soul!’ and views his own proportions with comic alarm; tell him so at forty, and it will be found that he has long since ceased to worry about it; tell him so at forty-five, and lo! it is more than probable that he has begun to pride himself on his bulk.

What can’t be cured must be endured. All the stern giving up of beer and potatoes, all the perspiring exercise in the world, is of no weight against the steady advance–and we say it with all due respect–of one’s own ‘corporation.’ And so, as fat men are pretty generally, philosophers, it occurred to them that it might be a good idea to make a virtue of necessity, and club their fat together for convivial purposes.

“There be none so humorous as your fellows of paunch.”

Thus the fat men’s club. And certainly if there be one thing more than another, in this sad world, likely to provoke the twinkle of the eye and the smile of satisfaction, it is the contemplation of the jolly fat man. There be none so humorous as your fellows of paunch. But what a pity it is that Falstaff knew nothing of clam bakes! How royally he might have presided yesterday at South Norwalk, Conn., where the annual feast of the neighboring Brobdignagi on the succulent bivalves of the Sound took place! It is true that there were some ostentatious light weights present, who apparently were anxious for the reputation of fat men with barely good pretences, while against one snip of a fellow we see recorded only 199 pounds. How on earth he ever got into such a society we are at a loss to imagine, and if he doesn’t speedily make up the other pound (for 200 pounds, as we are advised, is the minimum weight upon which one may legitimately arrogate to himself the proud title of fat man), we shall feel bound to agitate his exclusion from this weighty society.

Politically, as becomes such philosophers as fat men are, the South Norwalk great ones are ‘sound.’ Nineteen of them only go for Grant, while 73 of them pant sympathetically for Greeley, (who, himself, is by no means a slim person, or a lean.)  Thus, mark the concomitants of a reasonable bulk: Good nature, jovial clambakes, their names in the paper (and their weight), and sound political principles. Who wouldn’t be a fat man?”

An 1878 map of Manhattan Beach Railway, which was built by tycoon Austin Corbin.

Back in the day robber barons did as they pleased and let you know that they held all the cards. Case in point: financier Austin Corbin, who was the money behind the building of Coney Island and consolidating the Long Island Railroad. He stole land from Native Americans and barred Jewish people from his hotels, but he didn’t lose any sleep over it. Corbin, who resided in Babylon, Long Island, also annoyed the nine-to-fivers by having his own private train car attached each day to the head of the commuter train, so that he didn’t have to ride with the hoi polloi. Sometimes this caused delays to occur and tempers to flare. The Brooklyn Daily Eagle had a story about such an occurrence in its June 8, 1891 issue. The coda below that story is from the June 5, 1896 New York Times, an article about a day Corbin didn’t–but should have–traveled by train.

••••••••••

Austin Corbin: rich bigot.

“Grumbling at Austin Corbin” (Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 1891): “There was an array of ‘kickers’ on the Patchogue express train for New York this morning. The ‘kickers’ were business men, mechanics, brokers, lawyers and others. ‘Is this railroad run for the personal convenience of Austin Corbin or the public who support it?’ was the question that ran through the parlor cars and coaches before and after the train had left Babylon. The reason for the feeling of complaint was that the train was eight minutes late. The time had been lost at Babylon in coupling on the private car of Mr. Austin Corbin. Mr. Corbin always has his private car, which is the handsomest one on wheels to-day, run at the head of the train so as to avoid taking the dust that would make riding unpleasant were the car hitched to the rear of the train. The eight minutes’ loss of headway was a serious matter in the minds of the business men who were passengers, as those of them who were heading for New York feared that it would lose them a boat, and the loss of a James slip boat means the loss of a half hour, and the loss of a Thirty-fourth street boat entails a loss of ten minutes. Beside, the passengers for Brooklyn were delayed, and on the Atlantic division there is no chance to make up time, for the management of the rapid transit trains puts them directly in front of a belated through train and not much time is lost. The protestants against the loss of time were very much placated upon reaching Hunter’s Point when they found that the train had made up four minutes of time and that the ferryboats had been held back for the train.”

••••••••••

 

Austin Corbin Dead: Thrown Out of His Carriage at Newport, New Hampshire, Suffers Severely a Portion of the Time from His Injuries, Leg Broken and Head Badly Cut, His Scalp Laid Bare with Two Great Gashes and His Lips and Chin Frightfully Lacerated” (New York Times, 1896): “Austin Corbin died here this evening at 9:42 o’clock of injuries received by being thrown from a carriage. John Stokes, the coachman, also received fatal injuries and died at 6 o’clock.

Corbin Edgell, nephew of Mr. Corbin, and Dr. Paul Kunzler, the other occupants of the carriage, were injured severely. Mr. Edgell’s right leg is broken in two places between the knee and ankle. Dr. Kunzler has a broken arm and sprained ankle.

 

That odious anti-semite Austin Corbin stated in a 1879 interview, “Personally, I am opposed to the Jews.” He banned all Jewish people from his hotel, including the Manhattan Beach Hotel (pictured).

The accident took place at 3 o’clock this afternoon, when the party started from Mr. Corbin’s country house on a fishing trip. They rode in an open carriage drawn by a pair of horses which the coachman, Stokes, was driving. Just as they were moving out of the yard, the horses, which were being driven without blinders for the first time, shied, and all the occupants were thrown down an embankment against a stone wall.

Mr. Corbin’s injuries seemed to be very severe. It is supposed that the injuries that caused Mr. Corbin’s death were those of which the outward marks were two great cuts in the forehead. On the front of his head there was a cut fully four inches long, which laid bare his scalp; on the right side of the head was another cut three inches long. Mr. Corbin’s face was also cut and torn, particularly his chin and lips.

He was conscious when taken from the ground, and retained consciousness for a long time. Everything possible was done to alleviate his suffering, but his injuries were of such a nature that necessarily he experienced a great deal of pain.”


Tags: , , ,

Jacko: not long for this world. (Image by Chris huh.)

In 1895, Jacko, a randy Brooklyn monkey with an eye for the ladies, took ill near Prospect Park and met his maker. Locals provided a touching and ridiculously excessive funeral for him. A reporter from the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, who somehow had nothing better to do, recalled the monkey’s demise in the June 30 issue. An excerpt:

On Memorial Day some children who live on Prospect Park slope decorated the grave of Jacko, a little South American who most unwillingly left his native country, his parents and kindred to come to Brooklyn. He had many exceedingly endearing traits of character, and although he lived here but a short time, when he died he had a grand funeral and many sincere admirers mourned his loss.

Jacko was a monkey and this is how it came about that he left his sunny home to come to Brooklyn: Uncle Foster had at one time been a sea captain and frequently told his wife and their little nieces and nephews of the strange countries he had visited. Mrs. Foster wished very much to have a small monkey. So the captain asked a friend who commanded a vessel that went to South America to get a midget monkey for him and in course of time Jacko arrived.

He had been dreadfully seasick on the journey north. One day he got out of his cage. The sailors had to get long poles that would reach the high places in the saloon upon which the little fellow climbed, and beat him almost to death before he would come down. Jacko never forgave the men for their cruelty, and through the rest of the voyage he refused to take food from any one except the captain or the stewardess. Sailors and subordinates he scornfully turned his back upon.

Lincoln's funeral wasn't this elaborate.

He was given a warm reception by all the friends of the Fosters from far and near. To their very faces he mimicked their vanities and affectations, but they laughed at him and loved him. Had death not cut him off so soon he was destined to be a great gallant, for he manifested his strong preference for women and little girls. Quick as a flash he would jump into a woman’s lap, up on her shoulder, twist his long tail round her neck and commence expressing, in his monkey language, his admiration of the way she arranged her hair. His style of courtship was better understood by himself than appreciated by the women. Several were badly frightened by the five pound dandy. Their hysterics Jacko could reproduce to perfection, which, on the spot, he promptly did, but swooning was too much for his young dramatic abilities. Had he lived longer he might have attempted the emotional, but farce was evidently his forte.

Jacko took cold after the first fall rain and went into quick consumption. Every effort was made to save him, but it was not to be. In his last hours he was not content in any place except in his mistress’ lap. His little body wasted away to a mere nothing. He would rack himself almost to death coughing, then look pleadingly into his mistress’ face as if to say ‘Don’t you see how sick I am?’ The last thing he ever did was to stretch out his hand to her as if to say ‘Goodby.’ Then he died softly and noiselessly as a thistle down floats on a summer’s breeze.

Jacko was slightly too large to flush down the crapper, but I still would've tried. (Image by Usien.)

The children took full charge of the funeral, and it must be confessed that all was conducted according to the dictates of love and grief. Jacko was put in a little coffin covered and lined with pink satin. His poor little brown hands and throat were tied with pink and white ribbon. Pink and white flowers were in his hands and yards of smilax twined around the table and over his coffin. The poet and artist nephew of the family designed and executed a real work of art, a card, upon which one might read:

‘Jacko Foster is my name,
South America is my nation,
Brooklyn was my dwelling place,
Heaven is my expectation

When I am dead and in my grave,
And all my bones are rotten,
One little wish is all I ask,
Don’t let me be forgotten.’

Uncle Foster was at first inclined to resent the relationship implied in the inscription. But he found consolation by thinking of the great Darwin and mumbling to himself that it is not worth while to take notice of trifles.

The coffin was carried to the back yard by the pall bearers, lowered into the grave with ropes, earth was shoveled in and a mound formed. So ended the brief career of poor little Jacko.”

Tags: , ,

"The hanging of Jackson and Jarvis at Jamaica, yesterday, was made the occasion of a general holiday in the County of Queens."

The 1875 hanging of two convicts turned into a vulgar dog-and-pony show for the amusement of the locals in Jamaica, Queens. The January 16th Brooklyn Daily Eagle took everyone involved to task for the horrific spectacle. An excerpt:

“We believe murderers ought to be hanged, but we are opposed to having executions turned into raree shows or neck stretching festivals. The hanging of Jackson and Jarvis at Jamaica, yesterday, was made the occasion of a general holiday in the County of Queens, and a spectacular horror within the confines of the county jail. For this, the Sheriff, the hangman and a vulgar public sentiment are responsible. The accounts given of the proceedings recall some of the Tyburn scenes in the Seventeenth Century.

The victim driven through the streets for the amusement of a vulgar mob, the looming, ghastly form of the gallows, the ugly figures of the hangman, the loathsome rumbling of the cart over the stony street, and the hideous apparel of death of Dick Turpin‘s day were, in several respects exactly paralleled, and others vividly suggested yesterday.

With much mock solemnity, the poor devils were interrogated as to their feelings, badgered to confess their guilt, dressed in black, acquainted with the pressure of the noose, and pinioned for the satisfaction of the vulgar before they were taken out for destruction, while far beyond the jail walls rose the jeers and shouts of the less favored mob who had been excluded from actual contemplation of the spectacle. There is only one term by which such arrangements can be characterized. They are barbarous. It is disgraceful to our civilization that such things are tolerated. There is no good reason why, if a man is to be hanged, the hanging should not, in the presence of official witnesses, without unnecessary torture, be dispatched. It is a question whether exhibitions such as that of yesterday have not a more demoralizing effect upon the public mind than the crimes they are designed to suppress. They, in a coarse way, make heroes of the condemned, they awaken sympathy for them in many minds, they familiarize the mind with horror which is the next thing to making one delight in the infliction of torment, and they serve to awaken an antagonism to the rigid enforcement of the law.

No one who looked yesterday upon the body of Jarvis dangling in the air after having been drawn up and dropped twice from a rotten rope could have felt otherwise than that of the Sheriff and his executive assistant ought to have been strung up, for their bungling, on adjoining trees.”

Tags: ,

"He declared that unmistakable traces of poison had been found in the stomach and other organs."

In 1892, a Chicago woman died after a period of illness and was buried. But something didn’t sit right with her brother, who had the body exhumed and examined. His instincts proved correct, as it seems foul play was involved. Her son-in-law, a physician and onetime Brooklyn resident named Dr. Henry Martyn Scudder, who had learned a good deal about poisons in India, was thought to be the culprit. As was usually the case with the Brooklyn Daily Eagle of that era, the possible culprit was eagerly tried in the press. (Three months after the publication of this article, Dr. Scudder committed suicide with a large dose of morphine in his jail cell while awaiting trial for homicide.) An excerpt:

(Chicago, Ill., March 12.) Important developments have occurred in the Scudder case within the last twenty-four hours which will throw a flood of light upon the mystery of the murder of the doctor’s mother in law.

Frank Parker, the brother of the murdered woman, had just returned from Jamesville, Wis., where Mrs. Dunton was buried, as before stated in these dispatches. Mrs. Dunton’s body was exhumed and a careful examination of the skull was made. This was shown to have been fractured in three or four places and injuries were discovered which would easily have caused her death. But there were other matters to be explained. For some time prior to the murder Mrs. Dunton had been in a strange decline, which even the fact of her having an encysted tumor could not account for. This fact was remembered at the autopsy, and Mr. Parker determined that the investigation should be a thorough one. Accordingly the stomach and intestines were examined by the Janesville physicians and chemists. It was a startling discovery that they made.

"Dr. Palmer made a thorough examination of the wounds on Mrs. Dunton’s head, and he thinks they were made with a piece of gas pipe." (Image by Bernard bill5.)

When seen by an Eagle correspondent on his return from Janesville, Mr. Parker was too much agitated to tell fully the result of the analysis, but to a friend he declared that unmistakable traces of poison had been found in the stomach and other organs. There can be no doubt of this and the fact is going to play an important part when Dr. Scudder is placed on trial.

Although not willing to tell all that he has discovered to the newspapers. Mr. Parker did say this much to a reporter who called on him: “I was in Janesville Monday and Tuesday with Drs. Palmer and Chittenden to assist me. I had the body of my sister exhumed. Dr. Palmer has gathered evidence which is incontrovertible that Mrs. Dunton was murdered.”

The excitement in Janesville is intense and if Dr. Scudder had been in that town this week there would be no need of a trial. Dr. Palmer made an examination of the intestines and found evidence there of a startling nature. I cannot tell about these things in detail, because the lawyers in the case have told me to keep still. I can say that the intestines will be brought here Monday by Dr. Palmer and used as evidence in court. The membranes of the neck where the injection was administered will also show disclosures of a startling nature. Dr. Palmer made a thorough examination of the wounds on Mrs. Dunton’s head, and he thinks they were made with a piece of gas pipe. Those wounds alone were sufficient to cause death. The lawyers say that Dr. Palmer’s evidence is sufficient to convict Dr. Scudder.

Dr. Scudder was for many years a resident of India and he has always prided himself on his knowledge of the mysterious drugs.”

In view of these facts, it is now said that the prosecution will show that a deliberate attempt was made to poison Mrs. Dunton. That while she was greatly affected by the drugs, distinct traces of which were found in the internal organs, her decline was not so rapid as was evidently expected, and that thereupon her death was brought about in a violent manner.

Dr. Scudder was for many years a resident of India and he has always prided himself on his knowledge of the mysterious drugs used by the Orientals. The name of the poison found by the Jamesville chemists is to be kept secret until the doctor is put on trial. This afternoon an important investigation into the doctor’s sanity is in progress before Judge Scales of the county court.”

Tags: , , , ,

"Shipwreck of the Minotaur," by J.M.W. Turner.

Three articles in the Brooklyn Daily Eagle with a Huntington, Long Island, dateline succinctly tell the story of Elvin Darling, a ship captain whose wife liked sailing with him, their tragic 1899 accident and the grim voyage’s aftermath.

___________________________________

January 31, 1898: “Mrs. Darling a Sailor.”

Captain and Mrs. Elvin Darling left here to-day for New York, where his schooner, the James E. Baylis, is making ready to go to Norfolk, Va. There he takes a cargo of coal for Vera Cruz, Mexico. For return freight he goes up the Mexican coast some miles above Vera Cruz, where he loads with mahogany. Mrs. Darling seemed as much pleased at getting aboard ship again as her husband.

February 20, 1899: “Wreck of the Baylis–News Reaches Huntington of the Loss of Captain Darling’s Schooner–Fate of the Crew in Doubt.”

A telegram received in this village this morning tells of the wreck of the schooner James E. Baylis of Port Jefferson, of whcih Captain Elvin Darling of this place was master, and Frank Conklin, second mate. Captain Darling’s wife was also on board. The telegram says that the schooner was sighted off Cape Charles, Va., Saturday, by the steamer Foyle, bound from Brazil to New York. The Baylis was bound from Tuxpan, Mexico, to New York, loaded with mahogany and cedar. When sighted her masts were gone and her decks were awash and the cargo was floating about the seas. No signs of life were visible on the craft. Relatives of the men here hope that the crew were saved by a passing vessel. The Baylis was owned by the captain and by New York and Port Jefferson parties. She was built at Port Jefferson in 1874 and registered 360 tons. Captain Darling, who is known as an able captain, has been in a number of shipwrecks, but always escaped without the loss of any of his crew.

February 24, 1900: “Captain Darling Getting Married.”

Captain Elvin H. Darling was in town this week, accompanied by Mrs. Darling. Captain Darling, it will be remembered by Eagle readers, was master of the ill fated schooner James E. Baylis of Port Jefferson, which was wrecked off the Virginia capes a little over a year ago, and whose crew suffered so intensely from exposure. The captain’s wife died from exposure on the wreck before they were rescued. The present Mrs. Darling was a Philadelphia woman and they were married in that city last Saturday.

Tags: , , ,

Rhinoplasty performed in Essex, Germany, in 1895. (Image by Klaus D.Peter.)

The still-novel idea of modern cosmetic surgery is enthusiastically broached in this September 24, 1896 article from the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, which was a reprinted piece from the London Mail. It’s subtitled, “Wonderful Possibilities Are Now Open to Modern Surgery.” An excerpt:

“The latest developments of modern surgical science are making it evident that good looks are no longer to be confined to those with a heritage to them, but may be purchased on the open market. It will, no doubt, be good news to the unhappy possessor of an uncompromising snub nose to be made acquainted with the fact that, for a fairly respectable sum of money, his nasal appendage can be converted into a thorough going aristocratic Wellington, with no nonsense about it, and the spinster lady, whose proboscis is of the parrot type, and whose matrimonial chances have constantly suffered, will hail with a good deal of satisfaction and possibly renewed hope the statement that a generous fee to the facial surgeon will transform the offending organ into the dearest of little Grecians in the world, while an extra payment will secure for her two or three coquettish dimples on the cheeks and chin.

The science of facial surgery is, of course, not exactly a new one. Experiments without number have been made in the London and continental hospitals for many years past. It is not very long ago that the operation of making a very decently formed nose for a young woman whose face had been mutilated in an accident was successfully performed at the Royal Free Hospital. The breastbone of a blackbird was cleverly inserted into the cartilage of the nose and the skin deftly drawn over it and sewn with such neatness that in a short time the seams made by the surgical needle completely healed.

(Image by André Koehne.)

As might be expected, facial surgery came to us from America. There it is practiced in every large town, while a college for its special study exists near Philadelphia, granting diplomas and degrees for proficiency–genuine ones, too, it should be added.

That the science will make its way in England there is not much room for doubt. Already a private doctor living not a hundred miles from Bond street is making quite a reputation in the direction of facial surgery, and his handsome consulting rooms are thronged each day with crowds of wealthy patients, who are anxious to personally test his powers, and who go away eminently satisfied with themselves and convinced that if ‘beauty is but skin deep,’ it is a possession worth having, and, worth paying for.

So far, only those with the most unlimited purses are able to avail themselves of the doctor’s ability, the operations are of such a delicate nature, and require so much technical knowledge, mechanical skill, self-possession and nerve on the part of the operator, that no patient can grudge a generous fee.

The sensitive man, with a wart on the end of his nose, for instance, goes through life full of trembling self-consciousness. He feels that every glance is directed toward the terrible disfigurement, and he becomes nervously apologetic in his general bearing. Imagine what a heavenly vista of happiness and security must unfold itself to such a man, when under the magical knife, that accursed wart disappears forever, and how his gratitude can but be adequately rendered by a substantial expression of it.

Electricity is a useful help to the facial surgeon, and by its aid all kinds of minor blemishes are removed, and tell-tale red noses completely cured.

The only drawback to obtaining a really complete transformation is the possibility of the question of identification arising. One can imagine the unenviable position of the man who, in the absence of his wife and family at the seaside, takes the opportunity of considerably improving his appearance by exchanging a somewhat bulbous nose of a deep shade for one of clear-cut and classical proportions, being confronted with the unfeigned astonishment of the partner of his bosom, and, perhaps. repudiated as ‘not being the man who led her to the altar!’ Such a situation would not be an easy one to solve. The advantages of the science, however, undoubtedly greatly outweigh its disadvantages.”


New York City Barge Office, where Sanna Impola was taken.

In the October 15, 1900 edition of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, a homeless U.S. military veteran, down on his luck thanks to a mugging on the Bowery, meets a lost Russian maidservant in Harlem in the dead of the night and tries to help her. How their stories ended is not known. An excerpt:

“Charles Le Grand, who was recently discharged from the United States artillery service in San Francisco and was relieved of all his belongings, including his clothing, on the Bowery, Manhattan, some time ago, this morning found Sanna Impola, a Russian girl, who recently came to this country, wandering around the streets of Harlem. The girl made Le Grand understand she was lost and he led her to the Barge Office, where she was turned over to the authorities,

The girl came to this country three months ago and through friends secured a position as servant with a Harlem family. Yesterday she went to visit a countrywoman named Ida Halkela, living at Third avenue and Thirty-fifth street, Manhattan. She left there about 10 o’clock last night to go home and becoming confused lost her bearing and became lost. All night she wandered about and at about 3 o’clock was found near Third avenue and One Hundred and Twenty-seventh street by Le Grand, who was also spending the night walking the streets, because he had no money to pay for a bed. He took her to the Barge Office. An effort will be made by the authorities there to find her employers, and failing in this and the non-appearance of her friends she will be sent back to Russia.

Le Grand, who says he served in Battery G of the Second Artillery, and shows papers of honorable discharge, appeared at the Barge Office wearing the hat of a United States marine, the coat of an artilleryman and the trousers of a cavalryman. He said he came to New York recently and was robbed on the Bowery of $139 in cash, his watch and a ring. Even his clothing was stolen, he declares, and says that the combination suit he wore to-day was given him by different soldier friends he had met on the Bowery and who had taken pity on his plight.”

Tags: , ,

The National Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage, first located in New York and then D.C., was founded by Josephine Dodge. It disbanded in 1920 after the Nineteenth Amendment was passed.

According to a 1902 article in the New York Times, Josephine Dodge (Daskam Bacon) didn’t exactly make a positive impression at a meeting of the Pilgrim Mothers’ Society. Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who had died just before this meeting took place, founded the Pilgrims, which was decidedly pro-Suffrage. But when Dodge spoke to the group, she really pissed in the punch bowl.

Dodge didn’t seem a likely opponent to the cause. She wrote books with female protagonists and was vital in the development of the Girl Scouts. But she believed that women voting would somehow distract them from doing work in their communities.

Nine years after this speech, Dodge formed the National Association Opposed to Woman Suffrage, which was aimed at keeping the ballot out of women’s hands. Thankfully, she lost that battle when the Nineteenth Amendment was ratified in 1920. An excerpt from the Times article:

“Miss Josephine Dodge Daskam, the author, rather astonished the members of the Pilgrim Mothers’ Society yesterday afternoon when she expressed her views on ‘The Girls of the Future.’ The women who hold membership in the society, after a dinner in the Astor Gallery of the Waldorf-Astoria, had been listening to responses to toasts on women in business, in law, in medicine, and at the ballot box when Miss Daskam spoke.

Votes for Women March. New York, 1912.

‘The young girl of the future,’ she said, ‘I hope may find no greater responsibilities, no wider paths, no greater difficulties than the girl of the present has. Many women who are most valiantly anxious to gain their rights have always forgotten one thing–that the party of the first part, our brothers, are to-day where they were in the beginning; they have always the same advantages, the same responsibilities, the same difficulties, and, fortunately, they have the training to meet them. The girl has all of these things–and 753 extra tasks. And her back is no stronger and her shoulders are just as small as they ever were. I don not think there is much difference between the girl of to-day and Eve.

‘The girl of the future will be definitely obliged to choose between her ever-present privileges and her rights. And, if anybody were to ask me, I would advise her to hang on to her privileges and let her rights go.’

The silence that followed that remark was relieved by the laughter caused by Miss Daskam’s next remark that ‘if you can’t get your vote, you can always get your voter, and you can influence him in his vote.’

Miss Daskam then proposed what she called a ‘little scheme.’ ‘Let him,’ she said, ‘live and perish in the conviction that he knows and can do many things that you cannot, and always pretend that you never know.’ She said that men wanted to do for women things which they believed women could not do, and were angered when they learned that they could do those things. She said that the man ought to be permitted to keep the bank book, and to decipher for his wife the railroad time table, a thing which, of course, no woman is capable of doing.”

    Tags: ,

    "Mrs. Charles Gardner, the thrifty matron, is about 45 years of age."

    This article from the January 28, 1892 edition of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle has everything: an older woman, a younger man, a jilted husband, bigamy, fistfights, murder threats and the invention of a brand new piano varnish. An excerpt:

    “Astoria gossips are very busy at present. A thrifty matron there has two husbands. The younger and the latest acquisition, whom she prefers, has sworn out a warrant for her arrest for bigamy. The older one, to whom she was wedded nearly thirty years ago, loves her still and is persistent in efforts to have her return to him and threatens to shoot the favored husband if he does not remain away from the woman.

    Mrs. Charles Gardner, the thrifty matron, is about 45 years of age. She was once a gay soubrette. She played with a stock company in Philadelphia over thirty years ago and possesses still the charms, though now decidedly matured, that won applause and bouquets from from the Johnnies of that strictly proper city then. She was known to fame as Amy Lloyd. Charles Gardner, a comedian who at another theater was making Quaker citizens smile, met, wooed and won her. Her father in law being of an inventive turn of mind invented a piano varnish at about this time. Mr. Gardner, who was in ill health and tired of the stage, became interested in the invention and purchased some stock in a company formed to exploit it. It was arranged that the father in law should manufacture the varnish and Gardner, who is a fluent talker, should travel and sell it. The ex-comedian did very well. Several years ago he and Mrs. Gardner came to Astoria to live. As Gardner was on the road nearly all of the time his wife superintended the building of a pretty cottage on some property they purchased there.

    I will shoot D'Antreville if I find him in the company of Mrs. Gardner again.

    Three years ago in this month of roses the Gardner cottage was sufficiently near completion for the decorators to begin work. Among the workmen who came to do the decorating was Eugene D’Antreville. He was a sturdy, handsome fellow of 23, of the same age as the Gardners’ youngest son. Mrs. Gardner met him frequently. Their acquaintance ripened into love and it is said that, although it was not a leap year, Mrs. Gardner proposed marriage to him. He referred to Mr. Gardner, her drummer husband, as an impediment to their becoming one. She then declared that she had never been married to Gardner and went into hysterics as she had often seen the leading lady in her old stock company do. When she revived, she threatened suicide unless D’Antreville would become her husband. He then consented, and on Sunday, January 13, 1880, they were married, the Rev. Mr. Sheppard of the Reformed church in Newtown performing the ceremony.

    The honeymoon was spent in the Gardner’s cottage, now completed, and nothing marred their domestic felicity until May, when Gardner came home from a long Western trip. When Gardner had put away his sample cases and looked over the new house he was informed that Mr. D’Antreville was lord and master there. It is needless to state that unpleasantness followed. No one who witnessed the trouble would ever have thought that the Gardners played in light comedy. After some furniture had been broken and the husband and wife were more or less battered and bruised a policeman arrived and quelled the disturbance and Mr. D’Antreville was forced leave.

    Tar barrel. (Image by kallerna.)

    To obviate further trouble, Gardner removed with his wife to New York City. A few days later Gardner returned home and found D’Antreville there. A free fight followed, but no one was seriously injured. The Gardners then returned to their Astoria cottage. Gardner, on returning from a trip on the road several weeks thereafter, found D’Antreville again ensconced in the new cottage. D’Antreville stoutly maintained that he was the women’s rightful husband, and there was another fight. Both husbands threatened murder, and Mrs. Gardner fled to a neighbor’s home for protection. D’Antreville exhibited his marriage license to prove his claims and challenged Gardner to produce one. Gardner subsequently obtained a duplicate of the record in Philadelphia, showing that he had been legally married to Mrs. Gardner, and argued that he was her only legal husband. He threatened to shoot D’Antreville if he finds him in the company of Mrs. Gardner again. Gardner alleges that the woman is insane, but this is not believed. Mrs. Gardner follows D’Antreville about and frequently goes to his place of business. She was driven from the building the other day by D’Antreville’s younger brother, who placed a tar barrel by her chair, and literally smoked her out by dropping red hot chains into it.”


    Tags: , , , ,

    A 1941 U.S. freak show. (Image by Jack Delano.)

    I would have to guess that July 20, 1901 was a slow news day. How else to explain this ridiculous space-filler in that day’s edition of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle? It’s an article about freakish fraternal clubs in Europe. An excerpt:

    “There have been associations of all sorts of individuals formed in this country, but none of them would bear comparison for freakishness with some of Europe’s clubs. At Hoogstraelen, a small Belgian town, a baldheaded club, to secure admission to which a calvous area of 21 square centimeters, or 8 1/2 square inches, is imperative, has lately been founded. Its antithesis exists in the Long-Haired Club of Ghent, whose members must wear either a beard of 39 centimeters (one foot) or hair 20 centimeters (8 inches) in length.

    ‘Les 100 Kilos,’ a Parisian club for which no one weighing less than 100 kilos (232 pounds) is eligible, is in striking contrast with ‘Les Fifty Kilos’ of Marseilles, to which entrance is alone permitted to such as are over 170 centimeters (5 feet 7 inches) in height and under 50 kilos (118 pounds) in height. For several years the president of this club was a Mr. Be, who, though nearly 6 feet, weighed less than 98 pounds. Two years ago, however, he took unto himself a wife, under whose solicitous care he so rapidly gained flesh that in less than twelve months he was compelled to resign his membership.

    Berlin boasts of a big mouth club. In this club room is kept a wooden ball as large as a medium sized orange, which every candidate for admission is required to insert in his mouth before his name can go for ballot. In the same city, too, there is a one-handed club, composed only of such as have suffered the loss of a hand.”

    More Old Print Articles:

    Tags:

    "It is not known whether she is insane or not." (Image by Grigoriy Ugryumov.)

    This article from the 1892 Brooklyn Daily Eagle would be the saddest and most horrific story I’ve ever read if I believed a word of it was true. I mean, I guess it could be, but no, it sounds too much like an urban myth, thankfully. It involves a couple of women in Russia getting drunk on vodka and one of them proceeding to eat the other’s small children. Yikes. An excerpt:

    “A most horrible story of cannibalism is reported by the Telegraph’s St. Petersburg correspondent. A woman named Akkerman, a giantess in stature and strength, sought shelter at the house of a peasant woman named Yooreski Sariera, living in the Ismail district of Bessarabia. The Akkerman woman was afforded refuge by the peasant, and they became quite friendly. They drank a considerable quantity of vodka, and when the supply gave out Yooreski went out to get another bottle.

    She was gone quite a little time. When she returned she was almost struck dumb with horror on finding that her guest in her absence had killed her baby, gnawed the soft parts of its body and sucked its blood and brains. The woman was then in the act of attempting to kill another child, a 3-year-old girl,  who was seeking to escape from the hut and was screaming.

    The mother rushed in and tried to save her child from the murderess, but the latter struck the little girl with the bludgeon and killed her before her mother could reach her. The mother’s brain was turned by the terrible scene she had witnessed and she became a raving maniac. She attempted to kill herself, but neighbors who had been attracted to the scene by her wild shrieks prevented her.

    The Akkerman woman made a most desperate resistance when some of the peasants attempted to arrest her. She fought like a tigress and some of the peasants were quite severely injured. She was finally overpowered and bound with ropes. Five men accompanied her to the jail. The news of the terrible crime spread rapidly and on the way to the prison a number of men tried to take her from her guards and lynch her. They were prevented, however, and the woman was locked up. It is not known whether she is insane or not. The whole district is in a ferment over the affair.”

    More Old Print Articles:

    Old Polytechnic: kidnappings, beatings, riots, etc.

    Freshmen and sophomores at Polytechnic Institute in Brooklyn had a Christmas tradition, right around 1900, of kidnapping and beating the snot out of one another–and the police and press seemed to find it amusing. This school desperately needed to go co-ed and fast. In the December 18, 1902 edition of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, that year’s “festivities” were detailed. An excerpt:

    “Two Poly freshmen were pounced upon by a crowd of sophs at the Polytechnic Institute on Livingston street this morning and before their classmates could come to their assistance they were kidnapped.

    Tonight these freshmen will be made to sit in a corner and eat bread and milk at the Arena, in Thirty-second street, Manhattan, where the sophs will hold their annual Christmas dinner. They will also be made to sing and do other stunts for the entertainment of the class of 1905.

    The kidnapping of these freshmen led to a general mix up of the sophomores and freshmen this afternoon at the institute. The fight started in the building but members of the faculty interfered and ordered the boys to the street.

    Polytechnic's Electrostatic Laboratory, site of scientific discovery and brazen kidnappings.

    A minute later all the available freshmen were being walloped in the street by the sophs. The fighting became so rough that policemen were summoned and stopped it.

    When the policemen arrived three of the freshmen were tied up, and the sophs claim they would have been kidnapped had not the cops interfered.

    ‘Go on down there in the alley and have it out, boys,’ advised one of the cops, and a dozen eager sophs signified their willingness to accept this advice, but the freshmen claimed they were outnumbered.

    ‘Wait until to-morrow,’ said a florid, cheeked and red haired freshman, with a mashed hat and disheveled necktie. ‘We’ll kidnap the entire class of ’05 when our men get together.’

    The sophs gave the defeated leader the laugh. The cops and the crowd, including some of the Packer girls, joined in the twitting of the routed army of freshmen, and seemed to enjoy the scrap immensely.

    ‘It’s a shame to stop this, boys,’ said the policemen. ‘Clarke’s men don’t sweep the asphalt half as clean as you boys.'”

    More Old Print Articles:

    "Tom's death sentence was passed upon him some time ago, and the execution was carried out with great secrecy." (Image by TheWB.)

    I fear making Afflictor into a pachyderm graveyard, having already posted about the executions of Old Timey elephants Topsy and Big Mary, but I found an interesting story in the October 3, 1902 edition of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, with the subtitle: “Six Hundred Grains of Cyanide of Potassium Given to Him in Buckets of Bran.” It seems Tom the Trick Elephant, who had previously been a performer for P.T. Barnum, had grown unpredictably violent in the Central Park Zoo, and it was determined that he needed to be put down. An excerpt from the sad and colorful details:

    “Whistling a lively tune but with a sad heart and an effort, to keep the tears from his eyes, Billy Snyder, the elephant trainer at the Central Park Zoo, this morning fed two buckets of bran mush to Tom, the world famous trick elephant, and in just fifty-six minutes the big beast lay stiff and stark upon the floor of his cage. For many years Snyder had carried Tom’s breakfast to him, and he said afterward that he felt guilty this morning when he gave the beast poison in his food–600 grains of cyanide of potassium. Tom made a brave struggle against death, but could not withstand the powerful drug.

    Tom’s death sentence was passed upon him some time ago, and the execution was carried out with great secrecy. Only a small audience witnessed the killing of the famous beast, the general public being kept  in ignorance of the time for the execution. Those present were Parks Commissioner Wilcox, Director Smith of the zoo,  Dr. Edward N. Leavy, the park veterinary, Drs. Morill and Fisher, nerve specialists, Keepers Bill Snyder, Pete Shannon and John Rowley, chief of the taxidermy department of the American Museum of Natural History.

    The bran tasted funny. (Image by Sklmsta.)

    Those invited to the execution arrived at the arsenal at 8:30 o’clock and went to Director Smith’s office. From there they went to the elephant house and waited outside until the poison had been administered. For the last week Keeper Snyder  has been feeding Tom two buckets of bran every morning at 9 o’clock, containing some foreign substance, generally corn or barley. This was to get the animal used to change, for elephants are very intelligent and suspicious, and Director Smith did not want the experiment to fail. At just 8:44 o’clock Snyder and Chief Rowley entered the elephant house went into Tom’s cage. The big beast was chained by the fore and hind feet. Snyder walked up to him and patted him gently on the trunk. Snyder was whistling merrily when he entered the cage, but there was a tone of sadness in his voice when he called out: ‘Here’s your breakfast, Tom.’

    Just six minutes after the last pail had been fed to Tom he suddenly rolled over and fell on his left side, snapping off the left tusk as he fell. Those who were witnessing the execution thought that death was coming without a struggle, and one of them had just remarked that ‘it was all over’ when the beast arose to his feet again. Tom staggered as if intoxicated and his huge body swayed from side to side. He began to trumpet loudly, his tail swished nervously and he was plainly feeling the effects of the deadly poison. Then he had three falls in rapid succession, but he recovered each time and stood on his feet again. ‘He’s a hard one to kill,’ remarked Snyder.

    At 9:12 o’clock there came a spasm which foretold death, and the big eyes closed and Tom lay there in semi-comatose condition for some minutes without moving a muscle. It was not until 9:40, just fifty-six minutes after the poison was administered, that Dr. Leavy, who had entered the cage, pronounced Tom dead.

    ‘Tom tried to kill me more than once,’ said Snyder, ‘but I don’t hold nothing against him. Anyway, I’m glad it’s over, for we were good friends once.'”

    Tags: , , , , , , , ,

    An 1866 sketch of the Bellevue morgue, the first morgue in New York City. (Image by Stanley Fox.)

    If you were a patient at Bellevue Hospital in 1901, it was wise to finish your supper if the nurses ordered you to. That was the fatal lesson that patient Louis H. Hilliard may have learned. One thing for sure is that so-called “lunatics,” in general, take a beating in this jaw-dropping article from the March 1, 1901 issue of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle. An excerpt:

    “The judge declined to find Jesse R. Davis, a Bellevue Hospital nurse, guilty of killing Louis H. Hilliard, a patient, in the hospital. Davis, with two other nurses, was charged, it will be remembered, with beating Hilliard brutally and strangling him with a sheet because he would not eat his supper. There is a widespread belief that the nurses in the charity hospitals are brutal and when Hilliard died and bruises were found on his body and one of the bones in his throat was broken, people were ready to believe that the attending nurses had killed him. The Grand Jury decided that the evidence against the nurses was sufficient to warrant charging them with the crime. But the trial jury, which heard both sides of the case and saw the witnesses for the defense and for the prosecution, concluded, as already intimated, that the crime had not been proved.

    Bellevue Hospital a half-century later. (Image by Gottscho-Schleisner, Inc.,)

    The case of the prosecution depended on the testimony of two lunatics and of a newspaper writer, who had feigned lunacy for the sake of getting inside of the hospital to gather material for a sensational article. He has made sensation enough, but the jury has decided that it is like most of the sensations created by newspapers which depart from the legitimate business of printing the news to the business of making it. Scandals manufactured to sell extra editions do not bear examination. The newspaper writer told two different stories of what happened in the hospital. They could not both be true. The jury concluded that it would not believe either. The lunatics who testified gave their evidence in a simple straightforward manner. Though it is unusual to admit such witnesses to the stand it is not unprecedented and the Supreme Court of the United States has held that they ought to be allowed to testify, for otherwise attendants of the insane might do anything they chose with those under their care and escape punishment if they did it when none but the lunatics was around. The testimony of such witnesses, however, has to be sifted by the jurors just as that of the sane witnesses.

    The Davis jurors did not believe what the lunatics swore to any more than they believed the man who had feigned insanity. Their action is not such as to encourage prosecuting officers to put lunatics on the stand. And this is fortunate, indeed. While the testimony of such people may be legally competent it ought not to be used save under such conditions as those which the Supreme Court has said justify recourse to it, namely, when none but lunatics have seen the things which it is desired to prove. And even then a jury ought to be warned by the court against a conviction on the uncorroborated testimony of those whose minds are diseased and who are not legally responsible for what they say and who may have no sense of moral accountability. The testimony of the lunatic is no better than uncorroborated circumstantial evidence, and should not be treated differently. The twelve sane men who tried Davis deserve the thanks of the community for declining to believe such testimony. And they deserve thanks, also, for refusing to believe that men in training for the care of the sick would kill a patient on no greater provocation than his refusal to eat his supper. There are many inhuman creatures in this city, but it is not credible that they are attendants in the hospitals. The nurses do use force in handling the insane. Indeed, they have to do it when the patients are violent, but it is incredible that Davis and two other Bellevue nurses are guilty as charged in the indictment. If it is necessary to call lunatics to make out a case against the other two nurses their trial might be better abandoned.”


    Tags: ,

    Opium den in San Francisco's Chinatown in the 1880s. (Image by Louis Philippe Lessard.)

    I knew that there were people in the 19th-century who were opium eaters, but I wasn’t aware that it was a competitive sport. According to this odd article in the June 15, 1887 issue of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, you could win championship medals for cooking opium in national competitions. Also: Montana was apparently an opium hotbed in the 1880s. Who knew? An excerpt:

    “A confirmed opium fiend has been discovered among the performers at a Coney Island music pavilion. He is the possessor of two championship medals for cooking opium, won in national contests among opium eaters. Word was brought to Police Headquarters on Wednesday that an opium den was in operation at Frank Reeber’s on the Sea Beach walk. Officer James Boyle went to the place and found that Charles Sheppard was the only opium smoker in the place, and that he had his ‘layout’ in his bedroom. He and the layout were taken before Justice Newton, and Sheppard was let go by his own recognizance. Yesterday morning, with hollow eyes and shaking limbs, he appeared before the Justice and begged for the return of his layout, saying that without it he felt as if wild horses were tearing him apart. The Justice told him he might take a cell and ‘hit’ the pipe, and he eagerly agreed to give up liberty for the boon of smoking. He was not allowed to do this, however, but later in the day upon his explanation that he must have the opium and that he was lessening the dose to cure himself gradually of the habit, his layout was returned. He went directly to his room and lying on his bed in a mild ecstasy of anticipation began preparing and cooking the pellets. He is but 19, and contracted the habit two years ago in Montana.”

    More Old Print Articles:

    Tags: , ,

    For some reason, a man plays bagpipes for a penguin in 1904. (Image by William S Bruce.)

    This article from Popular Science Monthly, which was reprinted in the August 4, 1893 edition of the Brooklyn Daily Eagle, introduces the odd Antarctic bird known as the “penguin” to its readers–and then proceeds to describe clubbing them to death and eating them. It’s jaw-dropping by today’s standards or any standards. An excerpt:

    “Penguins are the strangest creatures ever seen. They are supposedly funny as the quack and strut about with their padded feet over the snow, or, coming to a slope glide swiftly downward toboggan fashion upon their breast. If one lands on the piece of ice they are resting upon they approach fearlessly with a threatening ‘quack! quack!’ For their inquisitiveness they, too, often received the handle of the club, for it was soon found that their flesh greatly resembled that of the hare, and upon them we had many a tasty and substantial meal. The emperor penguin is very difficult to kill; he will live after his skull has been most hopelessly smashed; the best way to put an end to them is to pith them. Six of us one day set out to capture one alive, and so strong was the bird that five with difficulty got their hold, and, after he was bound with strong cords and nautical knots, he flapped his flippers and released himself.”

    "The chief offender down there is a flabby woman."

    I think most physicians agree that dancing is the leading cause of syphilis, but there was one particularly outrageous dance being performed at Coney Island in the 1890s. It was called the “coucheee-couchee.” In its August 10, 1897 issue, the Brooklyn Daily Eagle took aim at this wicked piece of choreaography and incidentally revealed not only a puritan streak but a racist one as well. An excerpt:

    “District Attorney Backus says he intends to break up the immoral dances and shows at Coney Island. Justice Lemon, who is holding court at the Island, says there are shows positively suggestive of immorality which should be repressed by the strong arm of the law. And so it is likely that the vile couchee-couchee dance, driven out of Chicago, New York, old Brooklyn and every city in the civilized world will not be permitted even at Coney Island. This is the vulgar Turkish dance which a roving minister in amazing simplicity recently characterized as ‘a religious dance,’ a dance which has been viewed in Brooklyn only behind locked doors, after precautions were taken against a descent by the police. In commenting upon the too-sweet-to-be-wholesome innocence of this unattached clergyman’s indorsement of the vulgar dance a county official said to the writer of this column:

    "And so it is likely that the vile couchee-couchee dance, driven out of Chicago, New York, old Brooklyn and every city in the civilized world will not be permitted even at Coney Island."

    ‘I do not think that the authorities should place Puritanical restrictions on Coney Island shows, but they should insist on decency. There is no prudishness in insisting that a dance which would not be tolerated for one minute in public by the New York police, or anywhere within the limits of the old city of Brooklyn, shall be repressed at Coney Island. The chief offender down there is a flabby woman who would have been indicted, as were the Seeley dinner dancers, if the police had caught her at performances which she gave  privately before a party of half drunken men. The proprietor of the theater at which she appears recently promised that the couchee-couchee would be abandoned, but with his recentl clerical indorsement he doubtless felt it would be safe to go ahead with the dance again. But Captain Collins will arrest her if it is repeated. Unfortunately for the Turk, many ministers and private citizens of good repute have demanded that the district attorney shall prosecute if he again violates the law. The New York press agents of the immoral shows at Coney Island will have to work hard to earn their salaries during the remainder of the summer season.

    A police official or any newspaper man who desires to repress or expose the immoralities of Coney Island, will see little or nothing of the evils which disgrace this resort if he goes down there and discloses his identity. The couchee-couchee woman suddenly becomes as demure as a demi mondaine at a christening; the proprietor of a saloon in which blacks and whites of both sexes usually meet on free and easy terms appears as a stern enforcer of order and morality; the skin bagatelle tables are thrown aside; gambling games cannot be found; the confidence men and pickpockets as a matter of course do not make themselves known to the visitors, and the proprietors of bagnios are on their guard. The district attorney has a stack of affidavits made by responsible citizens, which clearly indicate the character of evils which have flourished at the Island. He is on the right track, and will meet with popular approval, no matter what indorsements may be given to the other dance house dives to which young loafers and criminals hunt for victims.”

    More Old Print Articles:

    Tags: , ,

    "There was some difficulty about gas inflating the balloon...Professor Lowe had to 'make his own gas,' a feat he is very competent to perform."

    Journalists at the Brooklyn Daily Eagle in the latter half of the 19th-century weren’t exactly bleeding hearts, but I don’t think I’ve ever come across a more insulting article than this story from the November 9, 1865 edition. It recounts a wedding ceremony in Central Park that revolved around the betrothed signing their marriage contract while taking a ride in a hot-air balloon. Apparently this was an outrage at the time and everyone involved needed to be mocked. An excerpt:

    “The balloon wedding came off yesterday according to announcement, and appears to have been a rather comical affair. The bridegroom was a fat old widower of about 50, his bride a lady of 25. There was some difficulty about gas inflating the balloon, which delayed the ascension, and the public are informed that Professor Lowe had to ‘make his own gas,’ a feat he is very competent to perform. Owing to the deficiency of the gas, or the weight of the bridegroom, the regular bridesmaid (a stepdaughter of the bride) could not be taken up, and a lighter damsel had to be substituted.

    The marriage ceremony was not performed up in the air, the officiating clergyman objecting to venture in the flesh so near Heaven. The marriage was done on terra firma, only the marriage contract was to be signed in mid-air. The balloon ascended from Central Park, in the presence of a group of gaping idlers, who amused themselves with making vulgar remarks and jokes at the expense of the bride and groom. The party descended in Yonkers in half-frozen condition. The affair would have been simply ridiculous were it not for the association with a holy ordinance which made the exhibition disgusting to every right-minded person; but as there were none such present on the occasion, excepting, perhaps, for reporters, no feelings may have been outraged.”

    More Old Print Articles:

    Tags:

    « Older entries § Newer entries »